Posts made by jaroonn

@raphjd said in A right-wing reader:

When you people stop grooming kids with your graphic porn books in school libraries and defending pedos, then I'll stop viewing you clowns as child fuckers

I am not "people." I am only me. And I have told you and the other crazies here over and over that I do not support "grooming" or "porn for" children. In fact, NO ONE does. This is just another example of how "you people" go off the edge and make ridiculous assertions because you have no intelligent rebuttals.

In fact, this "politics and debate" forum is a joke. You are interested in neither. You are only interested in having a "safe space" for posting the usual far-right crap and anyone who tries to disagree with you is an idiot or a pedo. Why don't you just be honest and re-name it "Right-Wing Rants."
As you are an administrator on this forum, I guess you are free to do what you like. So congratulations. This space is all yours do with as you like. I only hope for your friend's and family's sake, that you are not in reality the type of person who show yourself as being here.

@raphjd said in A right-wing reader:

Now run along and fuck some child.

Seriously. Think before you anger-type.
Unbelievable.

@raphjd said in Nazi soldiers as portrayed by the WOKE:

Now run along and fuck some child.

What the fuck is wrong with you? I really can't believe you are a moderator.

You can get angry, call me stupid...whatever. It means nothing to me. But really, a bit of decorum, please.

@raphjd So one person is "the WOKE"? All of us?

Don't bother...I already know exactly what you are going to say.

YOU PEOPLE....blah blah blah
YOU PEOPLE....blah blah blah

rinse, repeat......

@raphjd said in A right-wing reader:

You said we live in trailer parks. What is the normal emphasis when some asshole like you talks about uneducated people who live in trailer parks?

I did not say you lived in a trailer park. I said you were engaging in "trailer park talk," ie ignorant, bigoted and mean-spirited. And I stand by that statement. I don't know how much education you have, but I hope you didn't pay a lot for it.

Are you upset that I am making unfounded, sweeping generalizations about you without really knowing you? Are you upset that I am calling you "stupid' or an "idiot"?

How irritating that must be for you.

@raphjd "By the WOKE" lmao

Every fascist, populist movement needs a boogeyman.

@raphjd said in A right-wing reader:

Isn't that like how everyone who disagrees with you is trailer trash?

I never said "everyone" and I never said "trash." I know that facts don't mean much to you, but if you are going to quote me, at least try to get it right.

@raphjd It's so cute watching you pretending to support your "thesis." And the hole just gets deeper.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jeopardy-under-fire-woke-question-pronouns

@raphjd Your constant assertion that the modern day Democratic Party is somehow the same as it was in the 19th century is only further proof that you are unable to hold your own in serious discussions. Just give up.

@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:

Landowners (male and/or female) had the vote, before the general public.
Men (generally speaking) only got the vote, in the US and UK, because we had the draft and bucket lines forced on us.

No. Not in the US. All men (theoretically) got the vote with the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868. It has nothing to do with the draft.

https://www.history.com/news/voting-rights-timeline

I'm really happy you are not in one of my classes. I hate failing students

@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:

Women can vote. In fact, poor women got the right to vote without any responsibilities, unlike poor men who had to accept the draft and bucket lines. Just having a pussy was enough for them to be able to vote. Also, for the longest time, most women didn't want the right to vote. You also forget that voting was a privilege for landowners, not for the average person. Women owned over 70% of the pubs and inns (until about 1900 when men became the vast majority of owners), which gave them the right to vote.

Very amusing when you refer to the university professor as uneducated. But whatever. Not much of what you write matters much.

Let's start here. Do you not see any gaps in your "scholarly" timeline of voting rights? By your description, only landowners were allowed to vote in 1919? Or are you referring to a country other than the US?

You might want to read up on the history of voting rights before you commit yourself to print. Would save you further embarrassment.

@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:

Anti-murder of babies should be a no-brainer.

I don't know any liberal who murders babies. Whether or not an embryo is a baby or not is a religious vs scientific interpretation. And banning abortion is a perfect example of how the right always tries to legislate their morality.

"Don't say gay" is something you people made up.

Read the Florida law. Whatever you want to call it, it is meant to prevent discussions of LGBTQ+ issues in schools. Whether you agree with it or not, it is a again an example of the right legislating their morality.

You people also banned books, like To Kill A Mockingbird, Huck Finn, and many more because they used words that offended you.

I, and many other liberals, do not agree with this kind of censorship. In fact, To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the books targeted by Moms for Liberty.

I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing.

You people are enforcing your morals on the rest of us via the law; ie criminalizing disagreeing with trans dogma.

Please do show us where that law has been enacted. Oh right. You can't. It doesn't exist.

Conservatives have a proven track record of trying to impose their morality and beliefs on the rest of the world. Which "liberal" laws do you object to? Gay marriage? Equal pay for women? Desegregation? Universal suffrage?

Be honest. This is not the hill you want to die on

@Rapsey-0 said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:

Libs 100% believe that their morality is a universal truth. That's why they feel it's justified to impose it on the rest of the world

Where to begin with the sheer hypocrisy of that statement? Anti-abortion laws; "don't say gay"; book bans; the illegality of marijuana; the Alabama ruling that a fertilized egg is legally a human; Ghana's recent criminalization of even identifying as LGBTQ+? I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing perceived norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing. Liberals in America often need to remind conservative Christians that their god tells them what they can't do - not the rest of us.

@raphjd https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/28/google-chief-ai-tools-photo-diversity-offended-users

So much for yet another conspiracy theory.

@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:

I am basing my worldview on what you people say and do.

As am I; and it's not as flattering as you seem to think it is. You can try to hide your butt-hurt, white male grievances behind random rantings picked up trolling the usual sites, but people like me are WOKE. We see you

And besides, why do you care what I think? If I am such an idiot, just ignore me.

@raphjd Feel better? Do I detect Liberal Derangement Syndrome? lol

@Rapsey-0 said in Germany - The more things stay the same - Interior Minister wants to crush opposition:

Even the name itself, the "democrats", as if they are somehow more democratic than the opposition. Rather ironic when much of their agenda is explicitly anti-democratic (representing the interests of minorities rather than the interests of the democratic majority, and often at the expense thereof)

It's just a name. I would like to know more about this anti-democratic "agenda" that they have? Would it be banning abortion? Would it be gerrymandering? Perhaps voter suppression laws? In which states, Red or Blue, is there a disproportionate number of Congressional representatives compared to the number of votes cast? And do tell which minorities in the US have laws that favor their interests while trampling on the rights of the majority ("often"...you said)?

And out of curiosity, do you believe "three wolves and a sheep shouldn't be able to vote what's for lunch," or are you just a more straightforward "majority rules" kind of guy?

@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:

Sorry, but you do have Trump Derangement Syndrom.

Your skewed view of the world is so transparent. The moral and intellectual acrobatics you MAGA-types have had to go through to make excuses for your orange führer have left you with no alternative than to invent a label for sane people who can see right through you. That's what narcissists and sociopaths do; the rest of the world is crazy - not me! It's very amusing.