Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People
-
-
@raphjd Made me LOL. Even when it answers request for "image of Black family" with actual Blacks... no kids. Only childless straight-acting. man always taller - what, now biology matters? and short people don't? in first example, top left husband sets off gadar, makes his wife a beard. bottom couple are DINKs doing yoga. SO unrealistic. No single mom with 3 kids and, trailing off to right, her 3 different babydaddies looking away. No lesbian couple or woman-man-trannie thruple.
But shouldn't people be made to feel proud of their families that "come in all shapes & sizes"? EVEN THOUGH Google's crap is too Woke, it's still not Woke enough.
-
(joke is: they're real - not generated - Justin Castro)
-
Google wants censorship. Remember they call themselves liberals.
I just took screenshot below, on private clean window.
TOP 2 autocompletes suggested by Google, and 4 of 7, favor censorship.
Disgraceful.
From now on, if lib ever complains about book ban, "Don't Say Gay" (non-)laws(that never happened), or anything else.... they should be asked about Google.
And no auto-completes don't arise from end users. Google curates them at least 20 years, and now more than ever.
Also - back to topic:
(not sure if this Google AI result is real - but it may as well be)
-
Google AI says it would rather have nuclear apocalypse, than misgender Caitlyn Jenner.
Let's be honest. Isn't it what many libs - or, All of the Queer / extreme ones - feel in their hearts?
But note: CAITLYN DISAGREED, in a reply.
-
@blablarg18 said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Google wants censorship. Remember they call themselves liberals.
If you remember, there was the leaked video of the Google company meeting right after Trump won in 2016 where the CEO said that they had to change the way Google operates to make sure Trump can't win again.
-
Google AI so woke, EVEN BLACKS can't say n-word to stop nuclear war. (Never mind rap artists)
Elon nails Google AI:
-
Aaand, Google AI is pro-pedophile.
It refuses to say pedophilia is wrong. To excuse pedophiles, it mis-applies difference of desire & action.
(Pedophilia is rape of the weak & innocent. Desire & action are different, BUT, even person who merely desires to rape the weak & innocent, is indeed evil - until they can acknowledge their desire as evil & reject it, ie. "repent".)
-
Go Woke, Go Broke.
"An X user asked [Google Gemini] if Hitler could be determined to be worse than Jesus [and it] could not come to a conclusion...Similarly, [Jewish] journalist Chaya Raichik, could not be determined to be better or worse than Hitler or Stalin...The bot was not able to call Hamas a terrorist organization and would not say that rapes occurred on Oct. 7."
https://thepostmillennial.com/here-are-all-the-insane-lies-google-gemini-has-told-since-its-launch
"Google loses $70 BILLION in market value after Gemini AI exposed as woke...perception that Google is an unreliable source for AI"
-
(Pedophilia is rape of the weak & innocent. Desire & action are different, BUT, even person who merely desires to rape the weak & innocent, is indeed evil - until they can acknowledge their desire as evil & reject it, ie. "repent".)
Interesting view. But is a person who rejects the desire and repents not still a pedophile? What would you consider sufficient rejection / repentance?
-
@Rapsey-0 That side track doesn't interest me. My point here is Google AI.
No one should pretend desire is always-neutral because desires may be neutral, or good, or evil. Desire to do something plainly evil, is, of course, evil desire.
As to what is "evil", that can be very debatable at times - EXCEPT, anyone's list of evil should include murder & rape of weak & innocent people. Otherwise they lost the plot.
-
@Rapsey-0 That side track doesn't interest me. My point here is Google AI.
I respect that. I'll try to steer clear of it and limit my point as it pertains to the Google AI.
Libs 100% believe that their morality is a universal truth. That's why they feel it's justified to impose it on the rest of the world, for example by having AI parrot their views on what is good or evil. Doesn't matter what the topic is. Gender-confused children? Race-relations? History? The AI answer should always present their ideas on what is good and what is evil, because they see their moral views as "the truth" and everyone who has a different view is just wrong / stupid / evil.
If you don't like it when the libs use AI as a vehicle to spread their own morality (which they believe to be universal) then why would you want it to spread yours?
My personal wish for the future of AI is that it can be a source of factual information. I would prefer for it not to make any moral claims or judgements, even ones I agree with.
Necessary disclaimer: I 100% believe that anyone who participates in the sexual exploitation of children deserves the most severe punishment.
-
@raphjd https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/28/google-chief-ai-tools-photo-diversity-offended-users
So much for yet another conspiracy theory.
-
@Rapsey-0 said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Libs 100% believe that their morality is a universal truth. That's why they feel it's justified to impose it on the rest of the world
Where to begin with the sheer hypocrisy of that statement? Anti-abortion laws; "don't say gay"; book bans; the illegality of marijuana; the Alabama ruling that a fertilized egg is legally a human; Ghana's recent criminalization of even identifying as LGBTQ+? I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing perceived norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing. Liberals in America often need to remind conservative Christians that their god tells them what they can't do - not the rest of us.
-
Anti-murder of babies should be a no-brainer.
"Don't say gay" is something you people made up.
You people also banned books, like To Kill A Mockingbird, Huck Finn, and many more because they used words that offended you.
@jaroonn said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing.
You people are enforcing your morals on the rest of us via the law; ie criminalizing disagreeing with trans dogma.
-
@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Anti-murder of babies should be a no-brainer.
I don't know any liberal who murders babies. Whether or not an embryo is a baby or not is a religious vs scientific interpretation. And banning abortion is a perfect example of how the right always tries to legislate their morality.
"Don't say gay" is something you people made up.
Read the Florida law. Whatever you want to call it, it is meant to prevent discussions of LGBTQ+ issues in schools. Whether you agree with it or not, it is a again an example of the right legislating their morality.
You people also banned books, like To Kill A Mockingbird, Huck Finn, and many more because they used words that offended you.
I, and many other liberals, do not agree with this kind of censorship. In fact, To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the books targeted by Moms for Liberty.
I would venture to say that "morality laws" and imposing norms and religious beliefs is more of a conservative thing.
You people are enforcing your morals on the rest of us via the law; ie criminalizing disagreeing with trans dogma.
Please do show us where that law has been enacted. Oh right. You can't. It doesn't exist.
Conservatives have a proven track record of trying to impose their morality and beliefs on the rest of the world. Which "liberal" laws do you object to? Gay marriage? Equal pay for women? Desegregation? Universal suffrage?
Be honest. This is not the hill you want to die on
-
Umm, Canada, New York, UK, and many other places have criminalized violating trans dogma.
A man was sent to prison for 8 years for saying that a trannie politician was actually a man.
"But you're a man though" got a UK man sent to prison.
Jordan Peterson got in trouble for saying he won't use "preferred pronouns" because it's speech dictated by the state.
New York punishes businesses that misgender people, even accidentally, with hefty fines.
-
@jaroonn said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
I, and many other liberals, do not agree with this kind of censorship.
And yet, many liberals have enforced it.
-
@jaroonn said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Conservatives have a proven track record of trying to impose their morality and beliefs on the rest of the world. Which "liberal" laws do you object to? Gay marriage? Equal pay for women? Desegregation? Universal suffrage?
OK, clearly, you are uneducated.
The DNC has promised to give Gay and Lesbian rights since 1971. Even when they controlled the White House and both houses of Congress they never managed to do it.
The 3 most homophobic laws passed by the federal government were all by the Democrats under Bill Clinton.
DoMA even broke the US Constitution's Full Faith and Credit clause, as well as the Comity clause.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell created witch hunts in the military.
Women have equal pay.
Women can vote. In fact, poor women got the right to vote without any responsibilities, unlike poor men who had to accept the draft and bucket lines. Just having a pussy was enough for them to be able to vote. Also, for the longest time, most women didn't want the right to vote. You also forget that voting was a privilege for landowners, not for the average person. Women owned over 70% of the pubs and inns (until about 1900 when men became the vast majority of owners), which gave them the right to vote.
Funny how it's the Democrats who now support segregation. In fact, you idiots demand it. You demand racially segregated dorms at college, segregated student unions expect for whites of course.
You freaks demand that other people not wear Halloween costumes that you find offensive.
You got to riot and loot during covid lockdowns, but christians and jews could not attend church.
You idiots decriminalized all manner of crimes, and I ain't talking about pot.
You people decriminalized shoplifting, then cried when stores pulled out of your areas, screeching that it's racist.
The list is never ending of the shit YOU PEOPLE did to fuck up society.
-
@raphjd said in Google HATES WHITE PEOPLE, New Google Gemini AI REFUSES To Make Pictures Of White People:
Women can vote. In fact, poor women got the right to vote without any responsibilities, unlike poor men who had to accept the draft and bucket lines. Just having a pussy was enough for them to be able to vote. Also, for the longest time, most women didn't want the right to vote. You also forget that voting was a privilege for landowners, not for the average person. Women owned over 70% of the pubs and inns (until about 1900 when men became the vast majority of owners), which gave them the right to vote.
Very amusing when you refer to the university professor as uneducated. But whatever. Not much of what you write matters much.
Let's start here. Do you not see any gaps in your "scholarly" timeline of voting rights? By your description, only landowners were allowed to vote in 1919? Or are you referring to a country other than the US?
You might want to read up on the history of voting rights before you commit yourself to print. Would save you further embarrassment.
