Hey genius - Nobody sued or decided for Pelosi to be removed from ballot.
Her guilt may be factual - but as fact is not yet established, at jury trial, under due process / full discovery & defense by her: it should not be used by courts, it should not be claimed nor assumed by any court.
And no one has yet asked it to be.
Thus, "innocent until proven guilty" - in court. While we peasants should still be able to say her guilt & vote by it.
btw OJ was still guilty even after jury trial... because, you know, he murdered his wife. But to courts, not guilty.
As we maintain OJ & Evil Witch Nancy's presumption of innocence in court, least you can do is reciprocate to Orange Man Bad.... aka follow USA constitution.
These concepts are not hard. It's just that you @hubrys are dumb. Yes.
Separation between court of law, court of public opinion.
Presumed innocent & due process, need not apply to court of public opinion - but MUST apply to court of law - or else USSA, dictatorship.
But libs want that, so you try to confuse/bury concepts.
@raphjd "The question is, did they look for evidence or just take the word of the side they support?" - Latter.