Best posts made by blablarg18

No - YOU @hubrys and other libs "equate talking about homosexuality with talking about sex" and equate homosexuality with pedophilia and say how mere bans on HIV-spreading or public lewdness or pornographic (sexually explicit) schoolbooks are somehow bans on Being Gay Itself, etc etc etc etc etc.

I never.

Even my comment, that you responded to, was orientation-neutral and gender-neutral - marked to your attention but nothing else - you did the rest.

Here it is again. This time, notice how orientation- & gender-neutral it is.

Normal adults are not bitter when they can't talk to children about sex. Predators & perverts are.

Brexit portended Trump 2016.

Let's hope Milei portends Trump 2024. Would be great to see USA libs this way.

https://twitter.com/infobaepolitica/status/1726385477463265759

@raphjd

@SimonHR2001 Just wait til people figure out Yahweh who in origin also wasn't very nice & only a tribal "god".

But none of that touches Christ who learned about universal genuine God, set Himself to overcome tribalism & envy & malice, suffered & died for it, and rose again.

@raphjd alternate headline: Religion of Peace accounts for 100% of martyred Christians worldwide.

"Billionaire LinkedIn founder and Dem mega-donor Reid Hoffman spent night on Jeffrey Epstein's 'pedophile island' AFTER financier's conviction, with Woody Allen visiting his home"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12046383/Billionaire-Reid-Hoffman-spent-night-Jeffrey-Epsteins-pedophile-island-conviction.html

"LinkedIn's Co-Founder Helped Fund the Suit" of liar E.Jean Carroll

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/13/nyregion/trump-carroll-lawsuit-hoffman-linkedin.html

"Top Democratic Donor, Reid Hoffman, Gives $250,000 to a Nikki Haley Super PAC"

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/05/us/politics/nikki-haley-reid-hoffman-donation.html

Hoffman now claims it was a "mistake" to visit Epstein Island .... but remember..... report says he spent the night & it was post-conviction. If (IF) he wasn't fucking, he was at least aware.

And now you know what to think of Nikki Haley - if her corrupt neocon warmongering didn't clue you in.

So rare to see lib admit even a small mistake.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13013523/Nicola-Sturgeons-adviser-wrong-push-zero-Covid.html

Prof [Devi] Sridhar now claims she regrets using the phrase 'zero Covid' and that her aim was to limit the number of infections....

To be clear, she doesn't admit much. She only means, she should have used different phrase for same beautiful wise aim she always had.

In June 2020...Prof Sridhar, originally from the US, published an article in The Guardian calling for a 'zero-coronavirus Britain'.

Another retarded American lib.

It matters because Nicola & she are/were tyrants, they prefer(red) tyranny:

Other experts who spoke at the inquiry said that the Scottish Government's refusal to accept that Covid was 'here to stay' led to a much slower release of social restrictions than was necessary.

But let's be grateful for small things.

experts accused her of 'rewriting history'.

'Prof Sridhar now claims she never believed in zero Covid, but all you have to do is go back and read her articles to see that's not the case,' says Professor Robert Dingwall, sociologist at Nottingham Trent University and former Government scientific adviser.

'Then she argued that Covid could be eliminated if not for the wicked English. Every scientist who knew what they were talking about said zero Covid wasn't achievable.'

They have a little option popup for seeing child abuse material?

https://thepostmillennial.com/ted-cruz-grills-meta-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-over-spread-of-child-sexual-abuse-material-on-instagram

Cruz displayed a poster of the warning message users are greeted with if they search for child abuse material on Instagram, which read, "these results may contain images of child sexual abuse."

Users are given two options: get resources or "see results anyways."

"Mr. Zuckerberg, what the hell were you thinking?" Cruz asked.

Zuckerberg attempted to say that the "science" behind the decision "is that when people are searching for something that is problematic, it's often helpful to, rather than just blocking it to help direct them towards something that could be helpful for getting them to get help." [ed: which Instagram does NOT do]

"In what sane universe is there a link for see results anyway?" Cruz demanded to know.

Zuckerberg said this was because "we might be wrong" in triggering the warning. [ed: excuse 2, since 1 was so lame]

Cruz demanded to know how many times the warning screen was displayed, but Zuckerberg said he didn’t know off the top of his head. Cruz noted that in a June 2023 oversight letter to Meta, the company refused to answer the same question.

Cruz asked whether Zuckerberg would answer that question within five days, to which Zuckerberg said "we will follow up on that."

"Is that a yes? Not a 'will follow up.' I know how lawyers write statements, saying we're not going to answer. Will you tell us how many times this warning screen was displayed? Yes or no?"

Zuckerberg responded that he would personally look into the matter, to which Cruz said "okay, so you’re refusing to answer."

"Let me ask you this. How many times did an Instagram user who got this warning that you're seeing images of child sexual abuse, how many times did that user click on see results anyway, I want to see that," Cruz asked.

Zuckerberg said he wasn’t sure if the company stored that data, but he would look into it.

Note: Online companies store that data 100%...... unless they strongly prefer not to.

@raphjd LOL "it's funny because it's true"

btw @jaroonn has yet to make even 1 comment on-topic.

rest of us try some, at least

@Rapsey-0 Just to note how @jaroonn implies - subtly or perhaps not-subtly: environment (others) is to blame for his/her/xer/its/their comment choices.

From past experience: It's never his/her/xer/its/their decision.

Always, devil made him/her/xem/them do it.

@raphjd Up at comment 1 - he begins with blanket DICKHEAD to all. But then pretends above it.

Some libs' ability to lie, is beyond belief. Fun to see tho.

This is jaw-drop deceit:

(Notice I've never called you a racist, fascist or self-loathing homosexual despite the vast evidence)

Statement does... what it pretends not to do. (calls 3 names)

Balance of firm & polite - perhaps too perfect, I mean, too bad they didn't beat her.

https://twitter.com/WojPawelczyk/status/1764572301234667577

"10% never get it" - Nice of @jaroonn to show us.

@raphjd indeed

he's Soooooooo far beyond pot - kettle - black

Shock to realize, this is same person.

Before & After, what?

Before & After, decades of lying - to arrange illegal wars that kill 100000s around the world.

She picked a necklace that would look like, teeth of enemy children.

@jaroonn We need update, from Ukraine front, where you volunteered bravely - right? right? - to do this person's bidding.