YES, I'm the one that hands out punishments and dealing with reported posts.
Well then that'd be fucked up. The only reason anyone should be requesting your removal is abuse of power, and I personally haven't seen a single instance of it. You have your opinions, and you allow others to post theirs.
Yet another liberal has asked the site own to get rid of me because of my "toxic republican propaganda".
I see that only liberals are allowed to have an opinion and everyone else must be banned. I guess if this was a building, they'd have set it on fire to prevent me from expressing my views.
Were you the one who gave warnings to Frederick and mhorndisk? If so, you're doing a really good job at not allowing your strong political beliefs bleed into your admin responsibilities, because I haven't seen you unfairly stop liberals from saying anything. Unless it was in private. You should be allowed to say what you believe.
So what you are saying is; "you have to be better than us".
I wasn't saying that. But I guess it's true. The people whose actions you condone, whether actively or silently, should be better than the people you express unfiltered outrage over.
http://americannews.com/top-obama-ally-gets-hit-18-felony-charges-theyre-going/
I know, I know, she's not a liberal because she did something bad. blah, blah, blah.
Nope. That's not how the narrative goes at all.
What happens is you use this as an example of how liberals condone stealing money from children or, better yet, since one liberal does it, every liberal does it.
If they criticized a random liberal with the same amount of vigor, you'd praise them for being brave. After you cleaned up the mess in your pants.
Call it for what it is: you're upset that they aren't on your side. Not that they aren't abiding by some phony principles you're holding them to.
The difference though is that liberals down vote anything their enemies say, not matter the topic or what is said. They do this while hiding in the shadows.
Hell, liberals down voted their own for condemning the violence on both sides.
RoyalCrown got down voted for supporting free speech.
That's their way of trolling I guess. While you have your own. You're far from the moral high ground.
The stuff you talk about happens on both "sides". Do a forum search for "libtard" or "cuck". The more generic insults like "dumb" "idiots" etc. will branch out from there. Although maybe you've been calling them out and I missed it. Doesn't affect me that much though. Just gives me a better impression of the type of person they are.
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
The same goes for those that blindly cling to an ideology.
Aren't they essentially the same?
But really what you're implying is: "Those guys did a shitty thing, so that excuses us for doing our shitty thing."
I understand, I'm sure it must have been very complex and intricate for you to say that it would require more effort to explain than the nonsense you just typed.
I came back to apologize. You asked for civility, albeit in a questionably uncivil way. I feel bad for being so condescending.
I hope you have a good night.
This your second line: "I'm not saying you did it already. But I feel embarrassed for people who try it, as if they're fooling anyone."
Did what? In what way am I trying to fool anyone??
Lol, man. I can't do this. I do not have the energy to care enough to clarify this for you. Consider it a mystery you can spend the next couple hours unraveling. I even gave you a hint.
That's assuming you aren't already playing dumb to mess with me, which is exactly what I politely asked you not to do. Fucking rude.
I just meant don't be like "oh I was just fooling you all I was pretending to be mad to mess with you!" type shit.
I'm not saying you did it already. But I feel embarrassed for people who try it, as if they're fooling anyone.
You need to be more clear when you communicate because you're not making any sense. In what way did I "pretend to be mad to mess with you"?
Re-read the second line of my post. The one you literally just quoted and responded to.
I just meant don't be like "oh I was just fooling you all I was pretending to be mad to mess with you!" type shit.
I'm not saying you did it already. But I feel embarrassed for people who try it, as if they're fooling anyone.
I posted so many important topics today; no response. Can liberals not handle the truth?
Duder.
You seem mad.
Don't be mad.
Also don't backpedal to save face. It's too late.
Just encourage others by setting an example.
The two of you are being hypocritical here. You are offering no substantial input, but intstead just attacking other member - whomever they might be. That is actually against the rules. If you got a complaint, complain to the moderator. Don't rinse out your period stained panties in the forum.
So this was supposed to be a compliment?
No wait, "substantial input"!
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
man, you are really harsh on yourself there.
Am I? Please, elaborate as if you know me.
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
Also, did this topic really need two threads in the same 5 minutes? Holy shit.
I was actually banned from Google Plus a few years ago. I was just pointing out that Rabbis drink the blood from the baby's circumcised dick. Some of those babies got herpes and died. It's a whole story but banned from talking about. It's called Metzitzah. You're NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT. So just don't. The Rabbis suck baby's dicks. Sounds like a new post to see if it gets banned here too.
LMAO. I'm trying really hard to give you the benefit of the doubt on how you came across this information. But the only sites I can think of that would allow it are white supremacy sites. Or you were just googling for an excuse to hate Jews?
I sense a shift in the liberal community…
They had boldly and unabashedly put all their support in Hillary Clinton, and even beyond losing the election, she has done nothing but embarrass her brethren since the loss.
She vociferously blames Comey and the DNC for her loss, making her a pariah to her own supporters.
She's essentially doing a "scorched earth" approach to excuse her loss.Now they are parting ways with scum like Hillary and Kathy Griffin and will try to pump up some other liberals that haven't yet made complete asses out of themselves.
She's been in the public eye like once since the election. The only time I ever see her brought up is when someone defending Trump needs an easy deflection or someone to vilify.
Also, I wouldn't use the word "unabashedly". The support for Bernie Sanders wasn't negligible. And I would argue much of the rabid support for her was less about substance and more about being the not-Trump nominee.
Female circumcision is pretty common outside the west.
How "common" something is, shouldn't be a factor in whether it should be allowed to be done.
Males deserve the same right to bodily integrity that women in the west enjoy.
Pretty reasonable.