Posts made by abcddddd

@raphjd:

You might want to check on Snopes's political leanings and the lies they've been caught in.

http://freedomoutpost.com/texas-muslims-outraged-that-irving-city-council-backs-bill-that-will-ban-islamic-sharia-law-tribunals-there/

Ok, I get it now.   They want to stay in their country, so they demand we turn into their county when they get here.

Did you read the article you linked? Or just the headline? From what little substance there is, in terms of law, there's nothing that contradicts what the Snopes article said. So I guess in terms of journalistic integrity, your source is on equal footing with one you believe deserves none. Until you include the remaining 5 paragraphs of slippery-slope language that dresses up this non issue as one of grave concern.

Seriously, look at this dreck. It's laughable:

While the tribunal is headquartered in Dallas, blog posts around the country pegged its home as Irving: the purported ground zero in a Muslim takeover of the U.S. legal system.

Wow, there's blog posts telling us this? The authority they must have on this issue.

You are one of the people who make this forum fun. Thank you for that.

But I'm sorry. Your ego far outweighs your capabilities. It's a little embarrassing to watch.

I totally understand feeling insecure about it. But, just so you know, there are guys out there who are good with bald men, including myself. If you can find a way that works and makes you feel more confident, go for it. But don't torture yourself. Hope this helps.

@aadam101:

It's true what they say.  Conservatism is a mental disorder.  Once again it is proven what a bunch of perverts Republicans are.

The article is worthy of discussion. But I can't agree with this sentiment. I think your anger is misdirected.

@raphjd:

SO, muslims are coming to the west to "escape" sharia.

Now explain why muslims in Texas got extremely butt hurt when Texas passed a law banning the use of non US/Texas laws.   If they are escaping the laws of their homeland, they why would they care if Texas bans the use of their homeland's laws in Texas.

If you weren't justifying it, then why did yo do the "but these people do it too".

I didn't mention sharia. But since you brought it up, I looked it up, since I haven't heard about this story. Here's the first article I found about it:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/shariatexas.asp

_An Islamic tribunal does operate in the Dallas area, and has done so for several years. But the imams that run the panel do not usurp state or federal law. What exists is a forum where Islamic scholars help settle business disputes and other non-criminal matters. The rulings are nonbinding and work within the guidelines of U.S. law.

This is explicitly stated on the tribunal’s website: “These proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the law of the land; local, state and federal within the United States.”

Similar religious mediation services exist throughout the U.S. — for Christians, Jews and other devout worshipers — as a way to avoid heading to a civil court. These panels prevent private matters from turning into expensive, public affairs._

Is this what you're referring to? If so, the answer to your question "why would they care?" I would assume is that other faiths have been allowed the same exact right to a tribunal. And we could go back and forth about whether Texas lawmakers even gave a shit about this until bullshit sensationalist news outlets started calling these tribunals "Sharia courts" so they could capitalize from a recipe of fear + ad revenue.

But the real point is: the people I spoke about escaping their homeland are not escaping because they were denied the right to a divorce tribunal. It's probably something closer to not wanting their children used as human shields. And you know this.

I'll repeat for an eighth time. My point was: every group of people has extremist pieces of shit that do really shitty things that no one condones. It would be silly to define every group by its worst. And you don't do that. At least, for the groups you identify with or feel like are a part of your "team". Otherwise, you use it as an excuse to hate.

@mhorndisk:

Pussy smell.

If it's any consolation, it's becoming more economically and nutritionally feasible to become vegetarian. Don't give up hope, mhorn.

@raphjd:

LOL, the "news" source that still pretends that Talcum X is black.

Also, they're Armenian Genocide deniers, even the female cuck who is actually Armenian herself.   TYT is named after the very people who committed the AG.

Gotta love it.

Really going ham with this ad-hominem-tangent gimmick, eh?

@raphjd:

You justified Pakistan doing it because a terrorist group does it and you don't get why that's a problem.

Come on, your news outlet still pretends that Talcum X is actually black despite absolute proof he's as much a honkey as I am.

I don't know how much more specific I can be. It honestly feels like you're intentionally misunderstanding what I'm saying.

Their acts of violence are not justified. Terrorist groups are not justified. I specifically said there are Muslim people that come to this country to escape terrorist groups. Which directly contradicts your notion that if someone is of that particular religion, they're assumed to be in alliance with terrorist groups. To which I say: if you're comfortable making that generalization, do it for everyone. Show your forced outrage for anyone Catholic, because if several ministries cover up child sexual assault, well then every Catholic must be molesting children. At the risk of sounding like a feminist cuck, insist that if 85% of violent crimes in the US are caused by men, let's only allow female immigrants.

To be crystal clear, and before you take these points out of context: I don't actually subscribe to this line of logic. This is your belief that I'm criticizing.

This just in: Trump caught murdering babies for sport. Prison for life.

Republican defense: "Hillary is a bad evil person"

@Frederick:

The left NEVER take responsibility for anything.  At least when ISIS commits an act of terror.. they have the balls to own up to it!
The left just blames that bad bad gun for leaping into the hand of that moonbat and forcing him to shoot those people with those evil bullets that jumped into the gun all by themselves.  Bad gun.. bad bullets!

http://www.tmz.com/2017/06/14/congress-baseball-shooter-trump-hater/

Hey Frederick

To answer your question "Where's all the denouncing of this Trump hater?"

It's right there in the article you linked.

Sanders just released a statement on Hodgkinson, saying, "I have just been informed that the alleged shooter at the Republican baseball practice is someone who apparently volunteered on my presidential campaign. I am sickened by this despicable act. Let me be as clear as I can be. Violence of any kind is unacceptable in our society and I condemn this action in the strongest possible terms."

Does turning a blind eye work when neither are functioning?

@mhorndisk:

Sharia is NOT DISNEY'S ALADDIN.

hahaha

@Frederick:

Trump relented on allowing undocumented immigrants who came to the USA as small children.. and has decided to let them stay.   So, did the LEFT praise Trump for this decision?  OF COURSE NOT!  They are attacking him for breaking his campaign promise to deport them!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-will-allow-%E2%80%98dreamers%E2%80%99-to-stay-in-us-reversing-campaign-promise/ar-BBCLECc?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

You're totally right. So you can participate in this asinine partisan hypocrisy or rise above. Call out everyone, including your own party, for behaving exactly the same way. Encourage them to name good things Obama has done.

@raphjd:

Actually, I think his reply was spot on.   You justified a muslim country doing it because a terrorist group does it.

A Muslim country? You guys were referring to all of Islam.

If I need to be more on the nose, then my point is: there are very likely people of Muslim faith that want to migrate here to escape the people you keep equating them to. And if you want to judge every group by its worst, extremist outliers, then don't just cherry pick the groups Breitbart or whatever news organization is fully profiting from telling you. Be consistent with your philosophies.

@mhorndisk:

We the GAY TRUMP FRIENDS are here to ELIMINATE you.

k I'm done lol

@Frederick:

I think I can answer most of those questions…
Washington DC is referred to as "The Swamp" because before when it was selected as the spot to put the US Capitol, it was just some nasty wetlands on the Potomac River.  It was never a swamp, but it has always been euphemistically referred to as "The Swamp".  It is an established nickname that goes back over 200 years.  It was land donated by the states of Maryland and Virginia (useless land that they had no use for). 
Trump used the nickname "The Swamp" sarcastically.  When he said he would "drain it", he didn't mean drain it of water, but drain it of all the murky, creepy, underhanded, vermin that infest it.. meaning the overwhelming presence of ultra-liberal, politically motivated moonbats that put their own agendas ahead of the good of the country and the good of mankind.  That is why 97% of the donations from Law Firms went to the Democraps.   As I pointed out earlier today..   Law firms / lawyers prime goal is to find ways to GET AROUND the law and use it for their own purposes.  This is why virtually all legal documents are written in a non-existent language of "legalese" that honestly the judges and lawyers don't even understand.  These laws are written cryptically, leaving them wide-open to interpretation.  The lawyer who is more skilled at interpreting laws into bullshit they can present in court typically wins the case.   Hillary is an EXPERT at twisting and abusing law to suit her own needs.   She could argue that black is white, and night is day.. and WIN the argument!   She is extremely deceptive, and a formidable con artist (one who is skilled at instilling a feeling of confidence in others). 
A big reason that the people who like Trump give him there loyalty is that Trump has nothing to gain from being president.  It really doesn't benefit him in any way, in fact it hurts him personally and financially.  He made it clear that he can't be bought nor influenced, and will do what he thinks needs to be done to fix the country.  Trump has said many times that he would never run for president UNLESS the country was so screwed up that only someone like him - who is not able to be pushed around, influenced, and bribed - can have the objectivity and ability to fix the problems.   Because of the 8 year disaster of Obama, with no candidates worth a damn running for president (Sanders, Hillary, JEB!, Rubio, Kasich, etc.)   Trump jumped into the race.  Trump was the #1 candidate from the beginning of the 2016 presidential campaign, held that throughout the campaign, and despite the Republican party vehemently objecting to him.. the PEOPLE put him up as the Republican candidate with their staggering support. 
Now some moonbat will say "well, not a huge amount of people showed up at the inauguration".  That is because Washington DC and Maryland and Virginia are all overwhelmingly liberal moonbats.. far more than any other part of the country.  The citizens residing in those areas are not keen on Trump.  It was also RAINING which is why former president Bush was making a fool of himself trying to put a rain poncho on with Dick Cheney watching.

To be honest, I consider most of Washington to be a swamp. Not for the same reasons, but still for obvious ones. And I consider Hillary to be a part of that. But I challenge you to make a point, especially about Trump, without mentioning her.

And please, answer the meat of my post. Especially considering your unquestioning loyalty to him. What actions has he taken as president to drain the swamp? Or support his voters? What has he done to deserve you?

@mhorndisk:

If you KNEW you were superior, you wouldn't need to say a damn thing, would you?

Am I the only person who sees the hilarious irony in this?

You nailed it. Literally half the country shot this one guy.

@jazuko:

@abcddddd:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord's_Resistance_Army

This happens in the name of Christianity. Shall we abandon Christian immigrants?

are you actually comparing a terrorist group to a country and basically proving a muslim country is on equal footing with a terrorist group? ;D

Ehhhh. You could at least be clever if you're only going to dodge everyone's points with your snark.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord's_Resistance_Army

This happens in the name of Christianity. Shall we abandon Christian immigrants?

@mhorndisk:

I know a lot of you hate Trump just because he ran on the Republican ticket, even though you don't realize this is the reason you hate him. You know he has a history of supporting Democrats. The point is, he is for neither party. He is here to drain the swamp, which is infested by both sides. It doesn't make sense to hate him "just because" he ran on the Republican ticket and "just because" you hate Republicans. He's not a politician, he's a Statesman. He's not a Republican, he's a Libertarian. The only reason he ran on the Republican ticket, is because Hillary had the Democratic ticket, and because it would be useless to run as Independent. He is an Independent. He doesn't support Republicans - he knows they're corrupt, he only pretended to be one. He destroyed John McCain and Lindsey Graham. He has no loyalty to that party. And those parties have no loyalty to us. You have to read between the lines and stop with the idea that he works for the Nazis. It isn't True. I'm sorry you haven't been able to grasp this information yet, but you will.

I'm curious what you think about this, since you make these claims so confidently. Do you mind answering a few questions?

What do you think Trump means by "swamp"? What is it about our government that was swamp-like before he was elected?

While making a distinction between what he says and what he does:

What do you think Trump is doing to drain it?

What is Trump doing that makes you believe he has any loyalty to us in a way that other politicians don't?

Don't treat this like a debate where we're both out to cut each other's throats. Pretend I'm an honest skeptic.