If you mean fascist dictatorships and authoritarian capitalist states disguised as communism, you have the tankies to thankie for these not being condemned on sight amongst communists. If you mean Marxism in general, then it's because it is in fact a good thing in principle and the polar opposite of nazism.

The problem isn't in the theory, it's in the application: state communism invariably leads to dictatorships and crimes against humanity, even if the intentions are to "protect the communist state" and keep it from falling into capitalism again. That's not an excuse, however, which is the point of contention between tankies and other communists, as in, that the end does not justify the means.

In the end, the only kind of communism that can hopefully work without becoming a dictatorship is the anarchist, communitarian type. Either that, or electing a communist party and keeping the same political and economic system, but then that won't be communism, it'll be leftism, socialist democracy, what-have-you, and any deep social and economic changes that try to challenge or dismantle capitalism will be resisted by banks, corporations, and political institutions that would never allow such measures and have the power and capital to prevent them.

You're still saying cis like it's an acronym? Do you not have G.O.O.G.L.E. where you come from?

I hope you realize that LGBT activists from our history would qualify as "intolerant left libtard topkecks" according to the definition, and that you and everybody else in our community would probably not be alive today were not for their horrendous leftist ways. In fact, if it weren't for that horrible liberal propaganda, we'd probably all be either committed to a loonie hospital or being gassed in a concentration camp somewhere.

But, you know, it's the libcucks that are the cancer ruining society, etc.

It's not just on this site, it's pretty much everywhere. Much like out there in the offline world, where nazis and assorted flavours of white supremacist have been crawling out of the woodwork with the ongoing rise of nationalism, online so has the "alt-right" spread beyond the chans and the fronts into every site you can think of. I guess they're still butt-hurt over losing WW2 and those pesky non-Aryans contaminating the land and the gene pool with their filth, or something like that. I'm still waiting for the gay nazis to explain to me how they deal with all that cognitive dissonance, though, but I guess it's just one of those unsolvable mysteries…

I never had a karyotype test to determine what my chromosomes are, so I have no clue what they are. Which bathroom should I go to, then? Better have a third bathroom for "unknown/unspecified", methinks. How about something like those gender-neutral bathrooms that already exist in this planet on this very day and which people of any and all genders can already share without any sort of problems or inconveniences arising? That sounds like a plan to me.

Guys, a Black man killed another Black man; racism and police brutality are thus proven not to exist! Don't believe those liberal lies!!

No I haven't and neither would I ever, and a person has got to be a particular kind of nasty to do something like that to someone else.

Generally speaking, if someone's in the closet, it's either because they're having trouble accepting their sexuality (and in that case support and advice would go a much longer way than forcibly outing them), or they're just not safe to be out entirely, and by doing that, you could be jeopardizing their well-being or even their life. That could mean anything from their parents kicking them out after finding out, or sending them to some conversion therapy crap to try to get them "cured", or them losing their job, or even ending up targeted with homophobic violence.

If they're the ones trying to out you, then I suppose I couldn't care less what happens to them, but I'd still say for the sake of principle, if you have better ways of dealing with that than sinking to their level, those would probably be a better choice, in my opinion.

I've had it happen to me plenty of times that I'd have a crush on or fall in love with someone, then eventually those feelings would turn into a sibling-like kind of love and the attraction would be completely axed, but that included both sexual feelings and romantic love. So when it happens only to one aspect of it, that's certainly unexpected, for me at least.

Are you still intimate with your boyfriend in any way? Do you feel the desire to kiss him and be romantic with him, even if you don't feel the sexual attraction? Conversely, when you're not in a relationship, do you normally engage in casual sex without any romantic attachment and actually enjoy it? If you have complicated feelings about sexual attraction in general that could be the source of this, but otherwise, if it truly only happens after you've started a relationship, and the romance is still there, then I'm not too sure.

"SJW" is just the new cool fearmongering term that conservatives and some centrists like to use, just like the "uppities" and the Great Feminist Menace of yesteryear (even though some people today still seem to be stuck in the past, tragically).

The reality is that save for a few misguided folks, usually teens who don't have a very in-depth grasp of social politics, as well as a good lot of blatant trolls who know very well what they're doing, the majority of what gets classified as "some kind of SJW bullshit" can be anything from centrist/mainstream/"normal" equality politics (the kind your local law already accounts for, probably, unless you live in some fundie haven), to politics further on the left that favour equity over equality, to radical left politics which don't beat around the bush when it comes to identifying and bringing attention to inequality and "heavier" forms of oppression (like fascism or imperialism), and which are generally known for not being very nice, as they forego all forms of respectability politics.

It's a lot easier to just call everything you don't like or wish to comprehend "SJW bullshit" and label everyone who tries to have a rational discussion about these politics a "pesky SJW" or a "tumblrina" even if they aren't as per the words' definitions, which is why threads like these end up being created everywhere on the Internet, including gay porn sites apparently.

EDIT: Also, according to a lot of people, even something as simple as bringing up LGBT topics or just mentioning that gay people exist is considered "SJW bullshit" and "pandering", which should give you an idea of just how useful that term is in general.

Straight men are the biggest market for hardcore and even extreme porn (just look at all the femdom stuff and all the lesbian scat porn) so boo-hoo, some gay guys are into watersports, big deal. Straight people will think we're depraved and disgusting no matter what we do. If I let that affect what I do in bed then I wouldn't even have vanilla sex since that is already sinful enough as far as homophobes are concerned.

Respectability politics have never helped us before so why bother with them now?