House Republicans Accuse Rep. Adam Schiff of Allowing Colbert Staff Into Capitol
-
Proving they were fake? -- When you say "fake", what do you mean? Fake in that the headlines werent really written by that website, but were taken from other websites? Or that the stolen headlines weren't real? Or that the stolen headlines you selectively presented here were fake and the others you didn't link to werent fake? There's a whole lot to unpack there, I dont know what you mean.
I was the one who was saying the website was a content / click farm. That was my argument. That argument is the easiest one to prove. Which is why I (and also, the user soapbubble) we were making that argument here in this thread (and 2 other threads I believe).
This other argument you keep trying to shoehorn me into--- supposedly having been made by me-- that the main issue is the headlines are fake....well thats more of a complicated, multi-tiered argument that I'd be foolish to make right off the bat, but that you're just itching for me to assume the role of. Why would I do that?
Content / click farms -- thats the topic here. Let's stay on topic, K?
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
The articles are true. You can look them up on the internet and find the info on other sites.
Your beloved MSM doesn't like to cover certain types of articles, so they are almost impossible to find out about unless you live locally.
I already mentioned a prime example; Dylan Roof vs Emanuel Samson. Despite the situations being 95% the same, with the only real difference being the race of the shooter, MSM totally ignored Emanuel Samson's racist attack on a white church.
You are butt hurt that I found out about it from a "click farm" not the MSM, but are happy that MSM didn't report on it to protect the liberal agenda.
Your entire argument seems to stem from the fact that I'm getting to see news your "news" outlets refuse to talk about.
You don't like the fact that Emanuel Samson's racially motivated terroristic act didn't stay hidden in small-town Tennessee. Likewise with countless other news items.
It reminds me of Morning Joe's ho (Mika or something) when she said that it's the news' job to control what people think. She's said it twice now, with a few years in between.
-
Let me ask you a hypothetical:
Let's say there was a plane crash, and lots of people died in what appeared to be a suspicious accident.
Now lets say there are two people following that crash. One of them lives in India. This person writes for a news website in India. They went to college and have followed a career path of journalism. This Indian person, the stories they write about the plane crash are based on information that they have collected themselves from different sources that they have investigated, and they've used what they learned in college to synthesize the information into a narrative that they then publish online to inform their readers.
Now the other person, they live in America, they have a website where the information about the plane crash is published, but the American didnt do any of the leg work involved--- in fact, they took stories that were written by the Indian and they republish them on their American website in order to generate clicks they then get paid for.
My question to you is this: Here on this forum, what type of information are you generally wanting to present, info that youre most comfortable presenting? Would you be more comfortable sharing the links from the Indian person, or from the American one?
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
And lets say the information about the plane crash is identical... so the questions isnt even about veracity. Lets say its all truthful info identical info.
So the real question is, who do you reward for that info. Because like it or not, when you post a link on this forum, youre rewarding someone.
Who deserves the reward, the recognition? The Indian, or the American?
The question illuminates you and your personal character. Its a clue into how you view questions of personal morality, of right and wrong.
Now lets hear the 500 different ways youll dodge this question, or say "theres no difference!"
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
When the liberal agenda driven MSM and big tech, actively REFUSE to cover stories that don't match their narrative, then why should I reward them?
Of course, you being a liberal, would reward them for refusing to cover stories (ie; Emanuel Samson and countless others) that don't support the liberal agenda.
USA Today has been caught in quite a few scandals over the last few years, relating to truth and honesty. This is the same with all the MSM.
As AOC loves to remind us, it's better to be morally correct than factually correct.
-
@raphjd said in House Republicans Accuse Rep. Adam Schiff of Allowing Colbert Staff Into Capitol:
When the liberal agenda driven MSM and big tech, actively REFUSE to cover stories that don't match their narrative, then why should I reward them?
So you would choose the American in my hypothetical scenario if the Indian failed to cover stories that you thought appropriate. In your mind, that would be fair payback.
People who make no creative efforts of their own to publish content online don't deserve renumeration UNLESS some other person on the other side of the world doesn't cover all the right stories, then the loafers can get paid. Its very George Costanza of you.
I used a plane crash as my scenario. Lets change the story the Indian person writes about and the American person steals for clicks to an investigation of Hillary Clinton.
So in that scenario, the Indian would have then covered a story that you approve of. But according to your own logic YOU'D STILL REWARD THE AMERICAN. Here's how....
The Macedonian content farms are stealing headlines from conservative news sites. You're rewarding the stealers. The real content creators follow your rules, they publish content you like, and you still reward the content farms. You've completely butt-fucked your own logic.
Are you paying attention, or just equivocating again?
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
Content farms are grerat sources, especially when your beloved MSM and big tech collude to bury and/or ignore stories that don't suit their political agenda.
Once again, Emanuel Samson is a prime example. The white-hating racists at MSM and big tech made sure the world knows about Dylan Roof, while making every possible attempt to make sure no one knows about Emanuel Samson because he's black.
This happens on a regular basis.
-
@raphjd LoL
Essentially, your saying "It's okay what I did here posting these links, because someone doing something over there made It ok."
If no one knows about emmanuel samson, then how do you know about him?
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
@raphjd You know im gonna have to call bullshit here, because when i Do a google search on emmanul samson, whose links come up? NBC News, USA Today, NYTimes.
I THOUGH YOU SAID MSM SUPRESSED THIS INFO. OMG the supression must have ended JUST RIGHT NOW.
ITS MaGiCal!!!
-
Even though this nytimes article is like 5 years old, they must have just posted it now online
You said MSM supressed this AND you only said that like 3 minutes ago. that is so eerie.
From your keystrokes to the NYTimes website. its truly magical or maybe you lied when u said supressing, (sorry, not lied, JUST completely EXAGGERATE in order to sustain your BS argument) gee I wonder which one it is
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
Which means that ding ding ding, from now on, whenever you say "MSM supresses things" well were gonna have to take that with a grain of salt.
fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, well u know the drill
-
Have you thought that I might have heard about him via a content farm? I hope you aren't that delusional. I don't live in Tennessee so it would be odd that I would have seen the local coverage, which is where I originally heard about it.
Compare the coverage of Dylan Roof vs Emanuel Samson. Then tell me they treated both stories equally.
FFS, they still mention Dylan Roof constantly as part of their "white supremacy" narrative.
Honest question; Did you know who Dylann Roof was before this discussion? Did you know Emanuel Samson before this discussion?
My bet is that of course, you knew who Dylann Roof is, but you had to google Emanuel Samson.
-
@raphjd
But why did you have to go to a content farm when the info was on the New York Times?!?That just makes you promoting those links more suspicious. You could have linked from lots of legit news places, yet you post links to a content/click farm.
Neither of those names were familiar up to 5 minutes ago... that bowl haircut though I'm certain I've seen on television years ago for like a minute but I thought he had big coke-glass sized glasses he wore but that might have been another one, there almost like the Minions ---there are so many the faces blur
-
@raphjd
And can I just say its a little weird that youre focusing on mass shooters and this "problem" you've discovered ....where supposedly "not enough people know" about them. What the hell is that about?
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
The Roof/Samson cases show how the MSM and big tech is a prime example of how political agenda-driven they are.
There are countless others, like Hunter's laptop. MSM claimed that it was Russian disinformation (as did the 51 "intel expert" liars) only to admit it's real after the election. 16% of Biden voters said they would have not voted for Biden if they had known about it. Big tech banned people for posting about it, including the NYPost and other conservative outlets.
The NYTimes is full of lies. They also hire anti-white racists, serial doxers and many other scumbags.
-
@raphjd said in House Republicans Accuse Rep. Adam Schiff of Allowing Colbert Staff Into Capitol:
.
You git - you banned me because of a post - a NEW TOPIC - I posted... but you, on your high horse, are never wrong, so I guess that whole posting will likely be deleted now...
c'est lat vie!
I guess the war in Ukraine won't end tomorrow after all, because my post about Walmart being unfairly targeted for an attempted Juneteenth celebration product won't be read, so the Russians will continue the war!
Seem disconnected? yeah... look in the mirror...
-
The NY Times is a liberal newspaper. They admit as much.
Complaining that they hire BLM-favorable reporters is like complaining that Fox hired Tucker Carlson or Steve Doocy!
OMG! Did you hear that BLACK BAPTIST CHURCH down the street hired a new BLACK pastor?
Like 90% of your diatribes, this is FAKE NEWS...
-
It was so nice while you were visiting your masters in China.
-
I think I speak for many others in responding that we wish you'd go back to Mother Russia!
But wait - was it personal attacks, unrelated to the topic, that got me banned? Or was it just your (ab)use of your "powers" on a whim because you tire of people calling out your Russian-Propaganda-Fed bullshit!
The gentle readers of this forum can decide that for themselves...
On topic - where was the attempt by the film crew to interact, much less interfere, with MoC who didn't want them there?
Where were the weapons?
Where was the gallows?
Did they have an agenda - something they wanted to get the Gov't to do? Some law to pass or overturn? Some lawmaker they wanted to target?Inquiring minds (clearly, not yours) want to know!
For the record, they were recording a dog-puppet doing comedy bits around the office building (a puppet who smokes a cigar - funny? I don't think so, but apparently others do... and I'm of the opinion of let them be them - if they like it, let it be!)
Oh, and that's another thing... they were NOT in the Capitol, they were in an Office Building next to the Capitol. So uh... there goes another piece of your "house of cards" argument!
BTW: My new neighbor hired a black kid from our neighborhood to mow his lawn, and he's only paying him $20/week! That's less than ANY of the professional lawn companies charge - so I'm guessing my new neighbor is a slave trader or owner or ... there has to be SOME way to make this look like he's abusing that boy because he's BLACK! Right? It CAN'T BE that the kid asked him for the job (because he mows other lawns in the neighborhood) and the pay is exactly what the boy ASKS for in payment? NO! That wouldn't be HEATED and DIVISIVE! MUST FIND A WAY TO TWIST THIS STORY INTO A WHITE SUPREMACY STORY!
Or, not!
-
Still whing like a liberal.
