Combine Categories

bmuserd

Is there a way to combine categories within the image search?

For example results must be tagged as Asian AND Solo, selecting both seems to show solo and Asian torrents but not ones tagged with both exclusively.

TIA

bi4smooth

@bmuserd said in Combine Categories:

Is there a way to combine categories within the image search?

For example results must be tagged as Asian AND Solo, selecting both seems to show solo and Asian torrents but not ones tagged with both exclusively.

TIA

The search facility has been under a lot of maintenance (and scrutiny) lately... while it may not work currently, try using a + between the words (vs a space)

"Asian+Solo" (vs. "Asian solo")

I don't know - but maybe it helps?

Nietzsche58

@bi4smooth That doesn't address the question, it's about categories rather than search terms. Category searches seem to perform an OR match rather than an AND match (the latter makes more sense to the OP and myself). It would be nice if the term search gave a way to search for the categories using AND, OR, and NOT.

bi4smooth

@nietzsche58 said in Combine Categories:

@bi4smooth That doesn't address the question, it's about categories rather than search terms. Category searches seem to perform an OR match rather than an AND match (the latter makes more sense to the OP and myself). It would be nice if the term search gave a way to search for the categories using AND, OR, and NOT.

I see - you're referring to the "check boxes" in the Search page -- BEFORE you put in the search criteria...

I'm not sure how you would make that user-friendly... most of our users are not Computer Scientists familiar with the differences in the LOGICAL (not the English) AND, OR, NOT, and XOR...

I DO agree with you that it would be nice if the search bar itself had more advanced search features... like the ability to use a - to indicate that you should exclude a string...

So, for example: "OnlyFans -Reno" would search for OnlyFans, but exclude results that had Reno

Sadly, our search engine isn't that advanced - or if it is, I don't know how to use it properly... (The syntax above works in Google )