Lockdown for You but Open Borders?
-
That's right, they want to start another lockdown for everyone if people don't get vaccinated. Yet, they're going to keep the border wide open, allowing MILLIONS to come in and go wherever they want, without being tested, without being vaccinated without requiring them to mask up - basically non-citizens (or whatever you want to call them) are ABOVE the laws that citizens have to follow. The only way to describe this total inversion of reality is treason.
-
It's all about getting their new voters into the country.
-
@raphjd There is the naturally occurring phenomenon of the "pyramid" in which there are a tiny number of people at the top who are elite, and a massive number of laborers at the bottom.
Basically, for every leader there are a multitude of slaves, peons, simpletons, etc.
When the Declaration of Independence and Constitution were written, they often referenced "We The People", "justice for all" and "all men are created equal". At the time, the "PEOPLE" were defined as being adults (excluding children), male, Christian, property owners / white.
I wonder what the people writing the Constitution would say if they envisioned a future in which PEOPLE included everybody - including illegal immigrants, the dead, mentally ill, convicted criminals, abortion advocates, etc.
Here's something to ponder.. allow children to vote, and see what happens.
In other words, this country - the USA - is fucked. It's foundations never anticipated how the country would be re-defined.
Consider having open borders, and anybody moving to the USA automatically got the right to vote. There are roughly 7.5 billion people in the world. Only 4% of the earth's population are citizens of the USA. Who needs wars anymore? Instead of sending over millions of troops with guns.. just send over millions of people to vote in our elections!
If you want to see the near future of the USA.. look at how Europe is going down the toilet. If you want to see the inevitable future of the USA and the entire world, look at the disaster of Asia.
They talk about the CO2 emissions need to go down by 10% in the next 10 years. That is not possible.. because the population will go up by more than 10% in the next 10 years.
I realize that the future is inevitably shit. But hopefully that future will be 1000 years from now.. and not 10 years from now.
The most important thing left is to CLOSE borders. In furturistic models, they often depict the future as having people living in cities protected and sealed off from the rest of the world by giant domes. That certainly is not open borders. Already, with all the restrictions and turmoil in Europe, there is no longer any reason to want to go to Europe - so why bother?
I feel very sad for places like England. It used to be that the UK led by England ruled over 1/4 of the planet. Now England stands virtually isolated and alone amongst the ruin of the UK.. with entire cities taken over by their former arch enemies and rivals. Can you imagine Winston Churchill's reaction to having Sadiq Khan as the mayor of London? He would have called up Hitler and begged him to form an alliance. Almost everyone is ignorant of this fact.. but even in Churchhill's lifetime, Winston went from being the biggest hero in the UK.. to being hated and vilified and kicked out of leadership. Similar with Mrs. Thatcher.
To sum this all up.. humans are not capable of governing themselves.
-
@lololulu19 They wanted only property owners to vote because rights are derived from property. As your body is your property, slaves couldn't vote. A side note is that white men did not start slavery, but they did end it. The slaves came over and had nothing, and some of them were treated well, like Thomas Jefferson who had children with one of his slaves and provided structure to his workers. Some of them were treated terrible - it all depended on the relationship between the former British colonists and the former African tribesmen, who some of them were viewed as total savages that practiced weird rituals. However, the good "masters" (that's now a degree those liberal colleges profit from) had to work with the bad "masters" to escape a tyrannical monarchy, an imminent threat to all. They settled the differences over injustices with each other later - the Civil War. And it was black men who started the Republican Party and it was the Democratic Party that started the KKK. We don't have to have a shit future. We just need to spread knowledge. This is supposed to be the information age dammit! Why are people dumber than ever?
-
@manhandler And for all those of you "woke" folk, who will say that owning people is never good, therefore, there can be no such thing as a "good" slave owner. Of course not. One of the major problems I have is that liberals follow blindly as slaves right now, to a system that literally claims to legally and lawfully own you through many means, such as Capitis Diminutio Maxima, US citizenship, Birth Certificates, and Maritime Admiralty Law. You relinquish your rights in exchange for privileges. You relinquish your privacy and other rights through fear in favor of security. You relinquish your rights in favor of the mob through peer pressure. The people are slaves right now, thanks to YOU and the rest of society acting like sheep, which is why the government treats you like animals. In fact you are considered male or female, not man or woman, and the legal dictionary says that male or female distinguishes an animal. This is the system that was created whereby you "think" you are free simply because you cannot see your chains. After the Civil War which was largely fought over slavery, EVERYONE was considered a slave to the Corporation.
Was there a "good" slave owner? No, but many slaves spoke well of their masters who provided them with a better life than they had in the jungle and the desert in Africa among the tribal life, in exchange for labor. Not all of them were forced either. I think I read somewhere that the first slave owner in America was black. They were sold by Africans. Africa had slavery before America did, and America ended it in the physical sense, although Africa still has slavery today. Nobody is complaining about that one bit. Injustice? I guess it's only if the white man does it. That sounds like racism to me. Although slavery is evil, I don't think all of the slave owners in early America were evil, especially when their indentured servants spoke well of them. Yes, it has been tough for black people to get ahead, and yes it sucks. But much of their struggle today has to do with members of their own community, rap music, drugs, gangs, violence, BLM and ANTIFA burning down their neighborhoods. I am tired of being blamed for their plight when I had nothing to do with it. And yes Obama's family had slaves historically, does that mean I would blame him for something? Of course not. So I won't hold me to account for something like that either.
