Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!
-
Google's (now former) Head of Diversity, Kamau Bobb, is a massive anti-Semite.
Google didn't fire him. Oh NO, that would be racist.
He's now the head of their STEM team.
Black Privilege allowed him to be a massive anti-Semite and not get fired. It also keeps the liberal media from talking about it.
If he had "white privilege" he would have been fired within minutes of his blog being found out.
-
@raphjd agree
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Kamau Bobb
Terrible that people "with a history" are appointed to these positions without proper checks.
That said, I do not agree that he should be fired (removed from the role as Diversity Chief? hell yes - fired? not for that alone...)
Insisting that he be fired is cancel culture... punished, yes... fired, not necessarily.
Maybe - if there are other egregious examples of bad decision making or extremist views - but one mistake shouldn't cost him his job. However, in this case, he apparently apologized and agreed that it was wrong of him to make the antisemitic claims he did.Does an apology let him off "scott-free"? No! He's being punished... But people make mistakes, and need to be given an opportunity to atone for them and "recover" from them.
-
I have a theory... see if you agree...
Is it possible that these companies such as Coke, Google, Delta, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Disney, etc. are not really anti-white.. but instead are so terrified of being labeled anti-white themselves that they disingenuously put up a facade of being "anti-white"?I am tired of this crap. A couple of days ago, I was reading the posts of some white entertainer that I saw on a TV series. He was going nuts because someone DARED to say "ALL LIVES MATTER". He went into a dissertation into how RACIST that statement is.. and that it is an insult to Black Lives Matter. BLM is in fact a terrorist organization. If someone wants to say "All Lives Matter", I have no problem with that. BUT.. for someone to object to ALM in favor of BLM? That is absurd!
-
Ah, once again our resident fake conservative is against a liberal getting his own ideology used against himself.
It's not 1 mistake, but several, according to screen grabs of his blog.
As I said, in liberal clown world, he has black privilege to be anti-Semitic as he wants to be and not be canceled, but white privilege would have gotten him fired within seconds of the discovery of the blog.
-
I would partly agree.
Google, though, is a driver of the anti-white narrative. They actively hide information that doesn't fit their liberal narrative.
YouTube, FB, Twitter, Apple, and the rest of the "big tech" are all driving this shite.
I do agree that some companies are terrified of wokeness, so they do stupid shit to appease the left.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Ah, once again our resident fake conservative is against a liberal getting his own ideology used against himself.
It's not 1 mistake, but several, according to screen grabs of his blog.
As I said, in liberal clown world, he has black privilege to be anti-Semitic as he wants to be and not be canceled, but white privilege would have gotten him fired within seconds of the discovery of the blog.
So... Mr. "Dems are in favor of Cancel Culture" - wants to "cancel" this guy...
Like I said earlier:
- Punish, yes
- Cancel (fire), no
Your straw-man objection to his being black notwithstanding, Google did the right thing by quickly demoting him and re-assigning him.
-
If he was white, it would have taken 2 seconds for him to have been canceled. Only an idiot or liar would claim otherwise.
It's how your media outlets either keep claiming "white supremacy" or totally ignore black on asian and black on jew violence.
It's like who black lives matter, except when blacks murder blacks. David Dorn's life didn't matter because he was murdered by black looters/rioters.
BTW, he went from head of diversity, to head of STEM. Yeah, that sounds like a demotion.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
If he was white, it would have taken 2 seconds for him to have been canceled. Only an idiot or liar would claim otherwise.
It's how your media outlets either keep claiming "white supremacy" or totally ignore black on asian and black on jew violence.
It's like who black lives matter, except when blacks murder blacks. David Dorn's life didn't matter because he was murdered by black looters/rioters.
BTW, he went from head of diversity, to head of STEM. Yeah, that sounds like a demotion.
I'm neither an idiot or a liar - not everyone in this world (White, Black, or anything else) overreacts to every fart...
And I think you got that wrong - I don't think he's "head" of STEM.
If you are indeed right, I would agree that more should be done... but I stand by my mantra...
- Punish, yes
- Cancel, no
-
More than 1 article said he was moved to Head of STEM.
As a liberal, of course, you don't want a liberal canceled. Liberals are total hypocrites on the matter.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
More than 1 article said he was moved to Head of STEM.
As a liberal, of course, you don't want a liberal canceled. Liberals are total hypocrites on the matter.
As a compassionate, flawed human being, I don't want liberals, conservatives, (not even Trump!), women, men, whites, blacks, latins, asians, ...
anyone!
canceled because of a mistake.
You can't seem to get this very simple formula through your head:
- Punished: yes
- Canceled: no
case in point:
- Matt Gaetz - if proven to be into ephebophilia, and paying for young girls (let's assume, for now, that all were over 18)... should lose his committee assignments (for this term) and be censured by the house... and if he's re-elected, he gets to keep his seniority AND get is committee assignments back in the next term... he should not be expelled from the house (canceled) without a "trial".
- Mario Cuomo - if proven that he sexually harassed these women - WHILE Governor - should be impeached. (Reminder: that's like saying he should be charged, not necessarily convicted - ala Trump's impeachments). If convicted, he should be removed from office ad charged criminally. If not, he stays Governor and the criminal and civil trials will have to commence after his term ends. (Same as happened with Trump).
In both cases (a liberal and a conservative) - face trial (even if a political trial, like an impeachment) and the punishment handed down by that trial... not be forced to resign (canceled) without evidence from all sides and/or a trial.
-
AH, so you don't believe in equality.
Your fellow liberals support cancel culture, but you (all you liberals) are against calls for liberals to get a dose of their own medicine.
A guy that raised over $4mil because of a viral video has destroyed you liberals had to go hunting for something to ruin him. You dug up a post he made when he was 14, that's more than a decade old.
Yeah, let's protect a black guy who has a history of making racist and anti-semtic posts on his blog.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
AH, so you don't believe in equality.
Your fellow liberals support cancel culture, but you (all you liberals) are against calls for liberals to get a dose of their own medicine.
A guy that raised over $4mil because of a viral video has destroyed you liberals had to go hunting for something to ruin him. You dug up a post he made when he was 14, that's more than a decade old.
Yeah, let's protect a black guy who has a history of making racist and anti-semtic posts on his blog.
Anyone got a straw man? I need a straw man!
-
I haven't seen you raging about any conservative being canceled.
I do see you calling for a black guy who made racist and anti-semitic posts to be protected.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
I haven't seen you raging about any conservative being canceled.
I do see you calling for a black guy who made racist and anti-semitic posts to be protected.
Protected? no, punished!
Have I mistakenly assumed you can read English?
-
You keep telling yourself that.
I believe in equality, you believe in special rights for liberal hypocrites.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
You keep telling yourself that.
I believe in equality, you believe in special rights for liberal hypocrites.
Thanks again for telling me about my beliefs - I believe you don't have an actual argument to make, so you choose instead to attack me (mainly by calling me names)...
So you know, I do NOT believe in "EQUAL" rights - because that (at least at this time in our cultural history) is am impossible goal: the wealthy have extra rights (and the wealthier the more the "extras")...
But this isn't about rights, it's about PUNISHMENT.
And I don't believe in (nay, I OBJECT TO) cancel culture, plus I DO believe in redemption. I also believe in equitable (not equal!) justice... so punish, not cancel.
I would end by calling you a hypocrite.. but I don't want to stoop to your level (and I want to spare you the Google search)
-
Please remind me of when you objected publically to cancel culture other than when I point out that a liberal who advocates for conservatives to be canceled gets away with not being canceled when they get caught.
Are you saying you are innocent of name-calling? I hope not.
-
@raphjd said in Google's Head of Diversity - Oh My!!!:
Please remind me of when you objected publically to cancel culture other than when I point out that a liberal who advocates for conservatives to be canceled gets away with not being canceled when they get caught.
Are you saying you are innocent of name-calling? I hope not.
No, indeed - I strongly implied that you were borderline illiterate - sorry if you missed it.
I have objected to cancel culture many times - but perhaps the first time you've heard it from me was in response to your stated desire to cancel this guy.
I believe that, if you look back several months, you went on a rant against cancel culture in general (because Trumpites - I think it was Mike Lindell) were in it's crosshairs... and I posted that it was a rare-instance of us agreeing on something!
Funny how you support "canceling" some, but not others... that's hypocritical
-
Sure, you have objected to cancel culture. I agree that you have.
The difference is that you remain silent when Repubs are canceled, but defend liberal supporters of cancel culture when they are caught in their own shit and conservatives call for them to get a dose of their own medicine.
Normally, I am against cancel culture, but when an advocate of it gets caught, like the guy in this thread, he deserves to get a dose of his own medicine. A simple concept that is obviously too difficult for fake conservatives to understand.
