Twitter does NOT suspend liberals spewing hatred
-
But you said it as if you were an absolute expert on the topic.
You finally admitted that you talked out of your ass over this because you weren't interested enough in the topic.
Clearly, in your version of being a conservative "collusion" is an acceptable practice.
When businesses form a cabal, they are monopolistic.
-
@raphjd said in Twitter does NOT suspend liberals spewing hatred:
But you said it as if you were an absolute expert on the topic.
You finally admitted that you talked out of your ass over this because you weren't interested enough in the topic.
Clearly, in your version of being a conservative "collusion" is an acceptable practice.
When businesses form a cabal, they are monopolistic.
So Amazon & Google (truly BITTER rivals in business) are in a cabal, trying to suppress the speech of Trumpites... Oh, and they're joined by Microsoft and Apple (two more BITTER rivals)... and IBM and Oracle (more BITTER rivals)... but they're all agreed: collude to silence people they don't agree with politically (in spite of the fact that IBM & Oracle usually back Conservatives more than the liberals)... all because they CONTROL the Internet...
Deluded conspiracy theory anybody?
Oh, and the Chinese, and 189 other foreign countries all colluded (another cabal?) to create the HOAX that was COVID-19 ... solely to oust Trump from office! Yeah - that's the ticket!
-
Look - Google is large-enough in the search world to be almost a monopoly... they handle more than 92% of the World's Internet Searches (either directly, or because smaller search engines use Google as a back-end)...
Except for one thing: one of the requirements to be a monopoly is for there to be a significant barrier to entry. For example, it'd be incredibly expensive for an alternative phone company to come in and run new wires to every address in your town... so the local phone company really IS a monopoly, and is under partial Government control because of it.
That's where "Internet Monopoly" claims fail to meet the test: the only thing stopping Bing (which accounts for about 3% of Internet searches in 2nd place) from handling 100% of Google's workload is the choices of the Internet community! (They already have the capacity - do a Bing search for Azure (the cloud, not the color))...
The Internet is fickle... Facebook replaced MySpace in a matter of a few very short years.... Bing made HUGE inroads against Google in Internet Search - at one time garnering over 20% of the traffic... but then they lost it!
Other new services will arise... patience padawan...
The cost of "building" an alternative to Twitter isn't in the mechanics or the infrastructure (you can build your Twitter alternative in any of the big cloud vendor's data centers and only pay for what you use... the site can literally grow as your user base does (and shrink as your user base does)... not just month-to-month, or week-to-week... but minute-to-minute! (Cloud infrastructure is what I do... Trust me, unless they were careless or stupid, Parler could have been back up in another cloud vendor in less than a day!
No, what's stopping Parler from challenging Twitter (or Facebook) is purely the choices of people as to which provider (or platform) they want to be on...
-
WOW, the histrionics and strawman arguments. Who woulda thunk a liberal would do that.
Not every tech company is involved with this censorship of conservatives. DUH!!!
Clearly, you are high on Pelosi's panty fumes and can't make a reasonable argument.
