Definition of Fascism
-
Instead of countering my points, you have to call me names. That proves you know Im right.
The only difference between 1930s and modern fascists is the pathetic need to hide your faces now. At least the 1930s fascists had the courage of their convictions to show their faces, rather than being sniveling losers.
-
At least the 1930s fascists had the courage of their convictions to show their faces, rather than being sniveling losers.
Are you talking about yourself ?
They did not have any courage, IN ANY SORTS, facism has exterminated millions of human beings for the only reason they were jews, homoxexuals, communist, and everyone else who was fighting against him. I can't believe I just read this. -
Umm, fascism didn't kill jews as that was the wrong country. The National Socialists (sound familiar) of Germany killed them.
Modern fascism is what we see from antifa and liberals. They set an occupied building on fire because they didn't want someone to give a talk. A professor smashed at least 11 people over the head with his bike lock. They attacked an older driver because he didn't bow and scrape to them when they decided to shut down the city. Antifa has used violence to get their way.
-
Are you conflating the use of violence to get you way as wanting a better country?
If so, then YOU ARE A FASCIST.
You are no different than the Fascists of the 1930s.
Also, listen to the language of the left. It's clear they hate the west, but they won't leave and move to their non-white utopias that they love so much.
So all the people on the right that want war? or believe in war? or glorify war?
-
Actually, if you look, it's the Democrats that are the current war mongers. They are butt hurt that Trump isn't attacking everyone in sight.
Then again, they want the opposite of Trump, even it it's one of their long standing platforms like ending illegal immigration.
-
There's a huge difference between western leftists and other leftists.
Western leftists hate their country, whiteness and everything else associated with the west. Of course, it's no surprise when you ask a western leftist what country is better than a western country, they can't answer it.
Non-western leftist focus on more on communism/socialism, while western leftists focus on dictatorial governments.
You crack me up mate. I mean really crack me up. Some of your posts are the funniest ever. Western leftists hate their country!!!! LOL Many of your posts are full of sweeping statements making accusations at any side you don't agree with using quite aggressive language that I guess only forum police get away with.
Seriously though mate, going by your posts you need to calm down a tad. Your blood pressure must be sky high. Never heard anyone sound so continuously angry.
All the best
xxWestern leftists not only hate their countries, but hate their own gender, country and ethnicity.
-
Actually, if you look, it's the Democrats that are the current war mongers. They are butt hurt that Trump isn't attacking everyone in sight.
Then again, they want the opposite of Trump, even it it's one of their long standing platforms like ending illegal immigration.
I wouldn't say Trump is all that doveish, overall, but it is a fact that the hard left are clamouring for bloody war against Syria, which would virtually plunge the world knee deep in blood and a World War.
-
There were alot of fascist movements before the 2000s, mostly during the 20th century, and lord were they awful. Where I come from, there were all these smaller governments/individuals trying to gain power, and it fucked the country up.
-
Previously fascists admitted they are fascists and had the courage to show their faces.
Now the fascists pretend to be anti-fascists and hide their faces.
-
So why being antifascist is terrorism for Trump and republicans?
-
So why being antifascist is terrorism for Trump and republicans?
That's a dumb question. Antifa is not Antifascist. There are many words used to portray something, which actually mean the opposite. I'm sure you've come across such words in your life. "Fas" is the root word for "God's Law." Meaning the Axe is God. In the Congress, right behind speaker Pelosi are two 9 foot tall "fascis." It's the symbol for a bundle of birch rods tied together with a hatchet head. Fascist symbols are right in front of your face. "Jus" is the root word for Man's Law. Justice. We have a bit of a paradox. How can you have Justice with Fascism ever so present and in your face and you don't even see it? That's to answer the title of this subject, "Definition of Fascism." It's in contradistinction to Man's Law, the Constitution.
So to answer your question about "antifascist" (Antifa) being designated as a terrorist organization. It's self-evident.
And to add a point to other comments made on this thread in regard to Proud Boys… There leader is a black hispanic guy, so why would a bunch of white supremacists join an organization led by a black guy? Because they're military, and in the armed forces, those are your brothers. They are chauvanists, but being white supremacist is ridiculous. You can't just throw around the race card anymore. Listen to both sides, listen to their leader, and be a good judge. Justice is only served when you listen to both sides. None of you have listened to what their black hispanic leader has to say, and therefore, I say you're leaning more towards fascism, because you're only listening to one side. They don't tolerate racism or sexual orientation discrimination. I don't see any reason to believe they've raped, murdered, called someone the N word... anything. Do you got something? Maybe a video of one of their members using the N word...?
-
Fascist of the 1930s and the last 20 years are exactly the same, except modern fascists hide their faces.
Both use(d) the exact same tactics and reasons for their actions, with a slight twist in the exact words.
Look at 1930s photos of fascists in action, then compare them to antifa and BLM in action. It's shocking how they are almost exactly the same.
-
I'll also add that Trump designated both Antifa AND the KKK as terrorist organizations. They're terrorist organizations because they terrorize people. You can't look at the videos of Antifa and say they aren't violent. They're burning buildings with people inside (including CNN's HQ in Atlanta). They're assaulting people daily. They're murdering people who see things differently. They're looting small businesses (many owned by black people in their own community). They're torturing people (like the guy who was tied up for days). They're destroying businesses, government buildings, and churches. They're destroying vehicles and homes (rights are derived from property) and even in Austin they burned a homeless man's bed who happened to live where they met under a bridge downtown. They're rioting and blocking commerce (traffic). They do not respect people's rights, and they are not peaceful. End of discussion. Anyone claiming otherwise is just coocoo. The idea that you don't get it… when it's self evident shows that you are very low IQ. It's a dumb question.
-
Oh yes, and I think that of the 37 cities where the rioting is going on, 34 are in proximity to important federal government property. They're getting rid of the property owners in patterns, in opportunity zones, on certain streets. Catherine Austin Fits goes into that, showing maps. Look her up, but not on Google.
-
LOL at this thread… it always cracks me up when people with no reading comprehension bring up definitions to formulate an "argument".
Btw how can someone be a moderator of the boards and create threads that do not welcome any discussion but are flat out inflammatory?
It is the equivalent of a left-leaning moderator creating a thread just to state that the right in general is made up of racist, misogynist, god-fearing lunatics.
-
Once again, a liberal who can't point out how I am wrong.
Also, there's plenty of discussions here, which is why there are 3 pages.
-
Umm, fascism didn't kill jews as that was the wrong country. The National Socialists (sound familiar) of Germany killed them.
Modern fascism is what we see from antifa and liberals. They set an occupied building on fire because they didn't want someone to give a talk. A professor smashed at least 11 people over the head with his bike lock. They attacked an older driver because he didn't bow and scrape to them when they decided to shut down the city. Antifa has used violence to get their way.
This is a common misunderstanding from those who didn’t study the history of the rise of the Nazi party.
It was labelled a socialist party in name… but it was not one in action or creed. It was a right-wing party. Always was. But you really have to have looked into it more than just looking at the name to know this - or examine what they did (which were all typically right-wing actions).
This sort of thing gets confusing as people on the extremes (far right or far left) are often very similar in action, but different in creed. They do the same things all the time - but claim it’s for a different reason.
And liberal or conservative - is another misnomer. In the U.K. you have liberal conservatives - and they are the most right-wing. In the USA, you conflate liberal with left-wing. It’s really no where near this simple - and trying to discuss it in this way makes it meaningless. So it’s pointless - and I would encourage you to desist.
Also, if you really want people to come here and debate you guys, then you’ll need to be more open to having that debate. Atm, you’re not. It’s clear that’s the case from reading only a few of the most interacted with posts. Indeed, you’ll say now that this is a dig at you (an ad hominem attack) - but it’s not. I’m not attacking you to disprove your argument - I’m explaining why people don’t bother to come here or bother with you. If you truly want that to change, then you need to first change the only thing you can: yourself. Until then, most people (even if they could prove you wrong over and over again) simply won’t bother. You’re not worth their time.
-
Once again, a liberal who can't point out how I am wrong.
Also, there's plenty of discussions here, which is why there are 3 pages.
Learn how to use a dictionary first.
Its funny though that you accuse me (and others in this thread) of not being able to refute your claim and just name-call you while your OP is exactly that: name calling.
I've been in plenty of forums where political discussion thrives much more than the 3 pages you are happy about (mind you, its 3 pages in the span of 2 years, man).
It does not change the fact that most of your comments on anything political is an aggressive generalizing rant against whatever you define as "the left".
Pretty much the bottom of the barrel when it comes to political discussions.
-
Have a read through the entire section and see what is said and by who.
Liberals refused to call out their own for the violence and when I finally convinced a few to do it, they got shit all over by their fellow liberals.
Liberals are calling for tribunals to punish Trump supporters. Even before the election, they were calling for communist-style re-education camps.
Let's not forget that your side has done nothing but call my side every IST and PHOBE there is, plus many other names.
-
Have a read through the entire section and see what is said and by who.
Liberals refused to call out their own for the violence and when I finally convinced a few to do it, they got shit all over by their fellow liberals.
Liberals are calling for tribunals to punish Trump supporters. Even before the election, they were calling for communist-style re-education camps.
Let's not forget that your side has done nothing but call my side every IST and PHOBE there is, plus many other names.
Ok… I don't really have the time to go back through every post... but I think you make my point for me beautifully.
Some Trump supporters are racists - not all Trump supporters are racists. These statements can (and are) both true.
Some Liberals are calling for tribunals to punish Trump supporters (not seen this myself, but I can imagine some people have done this) - not all Liberals think that tribunals need to be called to punish Trump supporters. Again, both these statements can be (and are) true.
To use a broad brush approach to your opposition is - pointless. It can be disproven super easily... and stifles conversation, not improves it. This is the case for anyone who does it - regardless of their political or social leanings.
So... I can see you're particularly upset about some violence you have had done to you or have perceived to have done to you... or believe has been done to others from those who you think of as 'Liberals'. I don't know terribly much about these incidents, so if you go through and explain to me how you see it as having happened, I'll take a look and give my view on it.
I have seen posts by some... let's just say, well-meaning but not very clever... people calling for re-education camps. I understand why those people think that's something that should be done, but... I think everyone can agree... it's not. A good solid education would be good to see being given to all USA's citizens - but that's to advance them well in life. Education systems do not teach liberal beliefs exclusively - indeed at university level (certainly in the courses I've ever been in) the tutors are at pains to attempt to present all sides equally and encourage the students to form their own opinions, based on evidence, which they can rigorously defend against challenge. This is a key tenant of university-level education. It is also the item most noticeably absent from those without a university education - most of the time (not always, some learn it through their life experience). And even then, belief can sometimes trump reason - and override that training... such that some people still believe things which are demonstrably untrue. Sadly some people who are anti-Trump are not as well trained as this - and so fall into the same errors of thinking and logic that other no-to-Trump people can see him making.
But none of this means that 'Liberals' are all like this. That's a failure of logic. I could forgive you for saying: "all the Liberals I have met and known are like this" - but that would be, by your own admission I'm sure, an unrepresentative sample size and... meaningless.
I don't particularly like taking sides in things, often finding that working through disagreements ends up with a better overall solution. But for the sake of your view - that 'one side has called you and your group every IST and PHOBE' name there is... again, this shouldn't be a brush to tar everyone with, just because there are a large number of those exact people in the group to which you feel you belong. I, personally, could not stand to be amongst them because I am not one of any of those things - and don't put up with being around people of that sort. But that does not mean everyone who does support the same person as those people, is also a whatever it is the others are. eg: you might be a Trump supporter, but I will go by what you do and say to determine if you are a racist or whatever else. I've not interacted with you long enough to know yet.
BUT - you do have a tendency, which is unhelpful to your thinking, of labelling everyone else and tarring them with the same brush... just as some of them do to you. You have made the same error of logic. So... if you want that to NOT happen to you... my suggestion would be to NOT do it to anyone else. And no, resulting to that just because someone else has done it is... not a good enough excuse, as I'm sure you know (and I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have worked with your parents either... "but he/she did it first!").
So if you want to actually engage in conversation - start with finding out why about something that you are finding difficult... not reacting in the same way.
