Countering a homophobe's a-hole argument with pedo priests and abstinence
At school the the other day, our physics class somehow managed to talk about homosexuality. Now, the teacher, who's christian, BTW, brought up the argument "my ass is for pooping". I didn't give a shit (no pun intended) at that time, since I was actually trying to get some revision done. But on my way home, bored on the bus, I started thinking:
I came to the conclusion that that argument is flawed, and could backfire on the hardcore christians/catholics because:
It assumes that: If you are homosexual,you WILL have anal sex. (As opposed to 'normal vagina sex'.) [i.e. gay men [color=#FF0900]WILL have sex with men]
Thus: If you are heterosexual, you WILL have sex with someone of a different gender. [i.e. straight men [color=#FF0900]WILL have sex with women]
Priests who have sex with children (or other people) are in fact, not priests, since they have broken their abstinence vow.
The remaining, priests, do not have sex with women, thus they are not straight, therefore they are all gay.
leatherbear last edited by
I guess!! ::) There is certainly something wrong with the whole concept of celibacy!!! IMHO…....
The term revision has to be my number one indicator of an English student (no pun intended).
And you pee out of your cock, but it is still really great for other things too…..........
Um, when did straight people STOP having anal sex? They do too, you know. Part of the reason it was such a vile sin was because in centuries past, guys did it to "thwart the will of God" (avoiding reproduction) - Genesis - "be fruitful and multiply ...." etc.
bluehue last edited by
i bet your physics teacher takes it up the bum >:D
i wonder if anyone who does prostate examinations does it because they're gay