Personality or Looks?
-
Anyone think one is way more important than the other? Or do they balance out?
-
70% Personality 30% looks
I need a Good person to talk to … there are so many jerks out there it's not even funny ..
-
It depends…I guess??
I've met dudes who aren't exactly adonises, but they have such a charming personality that I just melt into a puddle.
On the other hand I've met guys who are stupid hot but have such mean personalities that I just think on hate-fucking them.
(Yeah, I would totally bang both...)
I think one kinda tries to balance it out subconciously: the nicer the guy, the less points in looks he needs, while the meaner needs more good looks for his company to become at least bearable.
And of course, there's the limit: if a guy is such a meanie, then the hotness is neutralized; if he's too ugly, well, personality won't get him in the sack 100% of the time.
Yeah, I realize I'm talking about nice vs mean personality but I think this applies well to the interesting vs bland scenerario too.
-
both otherwise… porn is better
-
Some physically attractive people seem ugly to me based solely on their rotten personalities. And I think many people who don't fit my physical ideal are very attractive/beautiful based solely on how great their personalities are. So, while I can't pretend it's all I care about, I definitely value personality over looks. Personality is crucial for any kind of "real" relationship. I can be friends with anybody, regardless of looks. But I can't be in a relationship with someone who I don't already consider a friend, i.e., someone who's personality clicks with mine.
-
Definitely a combination of the two.
I'm not expecting every guy that I wanna date to be an adonis. But what I do want is for him to put effort into looking the best he can look. -
Admittedly, it usually takes looks to get the door open, so to speak. We tend to choose prospects through looks first, then personality comes into play.
In the end though, I think personality trumps looks. That's if you want something that will last. Looks may fade, but personality is what will make you smile or carry you through tough times together through the years.
-
They all said the inner is more important, however, you have to be attractive enough for the others interested to see inside
So stick to the balance :cool2: -
I think I agree totally @brianboru72:
Admittedly, it usually takes looks to get the door open, so to speak. We tend to choose prospects through looks first, then personality comes into play.
In the end though, I think personality trumps looks. That's if you want something that will last. Looks may fade, but personality is what will make you smile or carry you through tough times together through the years.
-
This is is true. hahah… @unpleased:
both otherwise… porn is better
-
both
-
I
ll go with personality. You cant have a conversation with looks. -
For me it would be: 60% looks and 40% personality, although there is some exceptions…
Most of the time I usually like a guy just for how he looks like and then I start to appreciate or tolerate how it's his behavior, but there were some guys that won my attraction bc of their personality before than actually caring about how they look (they weren't many, I must clarify).
-
Neither, brains, of course, being a musician myself I have fallen for so many piano players so far and my actual partner couldn't get a note from another and still, I love him, in the end, what matter here was (and still is) that for the first time in 7 years I can picture myself with this person, my head is not somewhere else or wishing I was with someone else, I trust, and that proved to be the most difficult thing to get, I both feel and think he is right for me and so does he so yes, in the end, it was brains, I have to admire in some way my partner, and I do, he is 10 younger than me (in my defence, I rejected him 3 times and I only tried because I found out I had a brain tumor and I could die so what the hell? And here we are, real partnership) and has achieved a lot.
