http://www.pornhub.com/insights/gay-searches-united-states
:police: :cheesy2: fucking insane >:D
more than 3% of p.hub visitors watch gay porn ….
so more of the percentage of gay people in the us
definitely yes
When I've been in China I had to:
In the past, people rewrote the window size (by interception) to a smaller, randomly chosen value.
The GFW regexp(s) did not recognize the torrent traffic.
But now the fw seems to do stream reassembly, so this is not effective.
I asked some friends in China…
It doesn't seem gaytorrent is actually the subject of dns poisoning, nor ip blocking.
But the topology of the GFW is not homogenous, so it's difficult to be really sure.
If this is the case you may try to tunnel the connection to the tracker. (shadowsock, psiphon, tor, lantern, streisand, ...)
In my case, a VPN wasn't an option.. The connection for high-bandwith streams isn't stable in mainland since VPNs are banned.
Speedtest.net: 17ms ping, 32Mbps down, 19Mbps up
(browser->ssh_proxy->wifi->lan_server->ipsec->router->internet)
Line speed: 15ms ping, 98Mbps down, 21Mbps up
(router->internet)
GTorrent: 244.70kB (~2Mbps) up, 3.41kB (~0.03Mbps) down
(torrent->lan_server->ipsec->router->internet)
Are there actually any rules for actual rape videos? I have seen some torrents where it really looks like the person has genuinely passed out and being taken advantage of without consent .. but maybe it was all just be a freaking setup? How do you even tell if it's real or not? It really makes me feel uneasy, but maybe I'm just overthinking things?
:afr: Which torrents are you referring to? :afr:
Don't you worry child - Swedish House Mafia, John Martin, Promise Land
https://open.spotify.com/embed/track/7FfSlLkw04N9i8DvjlK2nR
How likely is it to have the tracker as an onion service?
It's already possible to use a transparent proxy to selectively tunnel the connection from the peer to the tracker over tor, but this would offer additional protection (e2e crypto) and would take off loads from exit nodes (probably guaranteeing better performances too).
It must be that Google/Android "spies" people a lot more than Microsoft/Win7/8/10 did/does.
Check out the site 'they' build in Utah - all searches, sms, emails and what not stored "forever", for our security 'they' say…
The datacenter in the Utah is a NSA thing, don't confuse a secret intellicence agency with Google. xD
Telemetry is embedded in Google products as is in Microsoft products …
No big difference here :blownose: They are ALL bad apples ::)
Recently my flat mate received a warning for using torrent to download some marvel films etc and got a warning
so that got me wondering
using the UK Virgin
How to find a torrent peer :
1. traffic monitoring
2. model the mainline dht into a merkel tree and follow the paths
3. sybil attack or rogue node
1 is the most common, be sure to enforce encryption in your client
[ - prefer encrypted peers: yes - ignore unencrypted peers: yes ]
Doing so, you will also help other users not to be detected.
2 costs more, as such, it's not the preferred method
Not feasible for private trackers (such as gtorrent.ru) because the dht is automatically disabled.
It introduces a large overhead into the network, as such it can be easily detected.
3 this are the worst kind of attacks
A sybil attack is a weekness of every p2p system. There's no real method to avoid this, only mitigation techniques.
A rogue node….. Is only able to track a really small number of peers. Its usefulness is basically limited (from the censor point of view).
Recently I heard that using TOR Browser you can access the Deep Web
however, when I tried to search for gay porn using TOR, I could not find any (was looking for BDSM porn)
I deleted TOR from my computer after I read that you can get arrested for thisanyone using it?
Is TOR safe to use in terms of anonymity?
How would you find gay porn on the Deep Web?
There's a lot of misinformation about the tor network and the tor browser bundle.
The deep web is everything that is not indexed by search engines,
the dark web is what can be accessed only using specialized software.
You can access the deep web using your regular browser.
Be it Chrome, Safari, Firefox, what-else.
The tor project is a US based no-profit.
The design concept of the network is based on a research of the US naval laboratory.
They receive a major share of their founds from the US government!
It it was an illegal thing, than there wouldn't be a company or a donation process involving a government.
You can be arrested for misusing the internet, but you have to do illegal things.
This applies to the clearnet, the deep web, and the dark net.
When you connect to the tor network, your traffic is transmitted and scrambled through three relays.
This relays (someone else computer) are located all over the world:
the network is mainly composed by volounteers who donate bandwith.
This makes the identification of the source of the traffic very difficult.
This also makes possible the access of websites currently censored in your country.
There are very few organizations that are able to identify a tor user (3 letter government agencies).
But it's a costly process, so unless you're a pedo, a drug dealer, or a hacker, spending moneys on you is not worth it.
This is the reason the tor network is misused by criminals: it's difficult to catch them.
This is the same reason the average John/Jane is using the tor network: they don't want to be tracked.
If you live in an oppressive country, where the press is censored (hello China, Iran),
you may want to read the news through the tor network,
otherwise you would not be able to read (let's say) "the new york times", but it can be any other paper.
If you don't live in an oppressive country, you probably don't have any reason to use tor,
unless you are worried about being tracked by ad-companies, competitors, or whoever else,
but the latter are very particular cases.
As any powerfull tool, it can be misused.
Clearnet is another powerfull tool, and if you abuse this power you can get arrested too.
Sorry 
, but I'm not all that sorry 
.
You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook
You are the owner of your data, they are just storing that data applying a "hoster lock-in". FaceBook is the owner of the metadata extracted from the users activity and the aggregated analytics data further extracted from the metadata.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata - https://prestodb.io - http://graphql.org
unlawful / contrary to established laws
This is perfectly legal, if a judge is going to ever think to emit a verdict against this, that judge is essentially saying that the governmental metadata collection is unlawful. This is not going to happen (FaceBook is part of Prism), the only protection is the EU's GDPR that's going to be valid from 25 May 2018, but with a 2yr transition period and only of EU citizens. Remember: metadata is not data
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveillance_program%29
Also, that agreement / contract is nothing I ever agreed to
Visiting https://www.facebook.com/ via tor to gain an english page …
Sign Up - It’s free and always will be. By clicking Sign Up, you agree to our Terms and that you have read our Data Policy, including our Cookie Use. You may receive SMS Notifications from Facebook and can opt out at any time.
There is ALREADY a russian clone of Facebook called. VK.COM
You may want to reconsider this after having more informations available.
How anti-gay groups use 'Russian Facebook' to persecute LGBT people https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/11/russia-violent-anti-gay-groups-vkontakte-lgbt-sochi
You're essentially migrating from a company that's selling your data to ad companies and the secret service of the (enlarged) five eyes countries to a Слу́жба вне́шней разве́дки company. Founder Pavel Durov was dismissed as CEO in April 2014 after he had failed to retract a (according to himself) prank April fools letter of resignation. Durov then claimed the company had been effectively taken over by Vladimir Putin's allies and suggested his ousting was the result of his refusal to hand over personal details of users to the Russian Federal Security Service and his refusal to shut down a VK group dedicated to anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny.
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/vkontakte-founder-pavel-durov-learns-hes-been-fired-through-media/498641.html
http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/22/durov-out-for-good-from-vk-com-plans-a-mobile-social-network-outside-russia/
https://web.archive.org/web/20140424024304/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-04-22/news/49318882_1_social-network-vkontakte-pavel-durov-founder-mark-zuckerberg
FaceBook may have more enemies than friends, but VK is not an alternative.
