Are collection rules enforced?
-
Here are the upload rules for collections:
- A COLLECTION is a group of files that have a well-defined common theme.
- The Title must specify the theme and the degree of completeness (all videos from 2010-2011; full site rip or complete as of a specific month/year; videos from a studio or featuring an actor; numerical series 100-200, 301-499; alphabetical listings of A-C, D-F; n number of clips of a particular porn theme; etc).
- The description must contain a list of all video files or titles including, by at least copy/paste the torrent’s file list. Please list video files and titles available through other existing torrents with links to their descriptions.
- A collection may overlap with another collection if it has a different central theme. For example, a collection may include a studio series from #201 to #239; with some duplicate files found in a collection about a specific actor; or a resubmission of a site rip after 3 months in order to keep it updated.
We get some amazing collection posts. They work because the models are named, so search works. Even if the theme is 'loose', you can find what you're looking for because they follow the collection rules.
I see and report a lot of so-called collection uploads like https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=d849eb723ecdff4828b94c8f64249cca6ca2abb6d3a3986f and they're almost never taken down or fixed. Should I stop reporting, am I misunderstanding, or should the collection rules be more strictly enforced (or some other option I'm not thinking of)?
BTW, this is not intended as shade to the mods, y'all are a gift, and I know things would be even worse without you. My goal is to preserve and help make available a lot of info that's being lost because the (good) rules really do help when followed.
-
@justatest90-0 it is wild that your example of a bad collection has a well defined theme, includes thumbnails, video titles and the performers are all named.
that presentation alone is worth a 5 star in my opinion, i would not report because the user is given all information they need to decide what files to download, if any.
i get your point, that it does not follow the rules in the most strict sense, but the site is considerably understaffed and there are so many worse torrent presentations, i imagine that as a mod when you see a report that has this much information and a proper theme, they probably ask why it was even reported.
-
@ianfontinell-0 said in Are collection rules enforced?:
@justatest90-0 it is wild that your example of a bad collection has a well defined theme, includes thumbnails, video titles and the performers are all named.
No they're not? The description reads, in totality, "say uncle collection". The rule says, "The description must contain a list of all video files or titles including, by at least copy/paste the torrent’s file list. Please list video files and titles available through other existing torrents with links to their descriptions."
The video titles and performers are not named. It also doesn't specify the degree of completeness (is this "random, here's the list" or complete for a specific window of time?).
-
@ianfontinell-0 Here's an example of it being done right for Say Uncle, and so you can actually find, ex, Felix O'Dair: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=13438257d7caa35b28b94c8f64249ccaff77031d53903e50. It's also clear it's just some random favorites (listed). Do I wish it had thumbs? Sure, of course. They're so easy to generate. But that's not a rule and it doesn't break core site functionality when not included.