Epstein Cover-up by Trump Administration
-
Key Lettergate faker used to work for key Russiagate faker.
"you can't make this shit up"
https://x.com/susancrabtree/status/1946181256020181176
The Wall Street Journal reporter who broke the “blockbuster” story alleging a letter Trump wrote to Epstein for his 50th birthday included some tawdry elements previously worked for Main Justice (his only prior reporting experience listed in his bio).
Main Justice was Glenn Simpson’s wife’s publication. Simpson founded Fusion GPS, which was paid by Hillary Clinton/the DNC (through Perkins Coie) to produce the Steele Dossier at the center of the Russian hoax against Trump.
btw - are Murdoch employees as lib-liar as NYT & other places? yes
Both Glenn Simpson and his wife, Mary Jacoby, worked for the Wall Street Journal before launching their own enterprises
Funny thing tho.
Murdochs are lib, but they want conservative audience & must get some stuff right.
Liars need your trust. & that is when Fox, NY Post, The Sun, Sky News etc. do good stuff.
Here, Fox re-posts funny "Ron Burgundy" moment of Dana Bash & CNN
vid - https://x.com/FoxNews/status/1945994237612319200
More fun. Liar-on-liar violence.
Jamie Raskin, D, lies nonstop.
Morning Joe guy was top asshole to defend Biden brain.
Morning Joe guy must build trust. What does he do? he undercuts Raskin - with truth.
It was a crisis then. It's a crisis now. Why didn’t Democrats call for the Epstein list release from 21 to 25?
Raskin squirms
vid - https://x.com/i/status/1945841012712051000
More. "Dems fumble when asked why they didn't release Epstein files when they controlled Congress"
Poor Pramila, in such low company.
Fun theory.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/honeypot-friday-july-18-2025-c-and
tldr;
-
Trump in 2019 had accurate case against Epstein
-
reflected in 2019 Grand Jury transcripts
-
Dems spent 2021-25 mucking it with fake & misleading evidence, such as "Lettergate"
-
THUS...... Trump today wants to release 2019 Grand Jury case, while Dems demand "full Epstein file" ie. what they planted & sabotaged
-
-
Lettergate worsens. Trump congratulated Hitler. oh no HITLER!!!
-
Trump sues WSJ & Murdoch for libel - as he should.
two Wall Street Journal reporters, the Dow Jones, Rupert Murdoch, and News Corp over a Wall Street Journal report claiming he sent a sexually suggestive birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. He called the story “fake” and denied any connection to the drawing allegedly bearing his signature.
btw - even Michael Cohen - yes, THAT guy - says Trump never doodles & probably can't doodle.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1946335514480812356
In his mind: Best case for libs & WSJ, is that Epstein assistant contacted Trump assistant who did it.
Autopen, anybody?
but that
assumes WSJ has something.Rn.......it is still possible that WSJ never had anything, went off hearsay of some lib.
-
Alan Dershowitz take, for whatever you think.
His interest:
-
Huge civil rights-y lib, OJ Simpson lawyer as well as Epstein lawyer
-
Tries to be consistent. Dershowitz went on to defend President Trump from fake impeachment, sometimes appeared on Fox & Tucker Carlson
-
Dershowitz got accused by an Epstein victim, but later she retracted.
-
Later still, she died in mysterious suicide.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1946645216892473764/photo/1
Client names "should be disclosed but the courts have ordered them sealed. I know who they are. They do not include any current office holders. We don't know if the accusations are true."
"The media can and should petition the courts for release of all names and information so the public can draw its own conclusions"
"Open records show an acquaintance between Epstein and Mr. Trump many years ago. That relationship ended when Mr. Trump reportedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, long before becoming President. I have seen nothing that would suggest anything improper or even questionable by Mr. Trump."
"It is clear from the evidence that Epstein committed suicide. What isn't clear is whether he was assisted by jail personnel [which indeed] seems likely to me."
"Epstein never worked for any intelligence agency. If he had, he surely would have told me and his other lawyers who would have used this information to get a[n even] better deal."
"That false story - recently peddled by Tucker Carlson - probably emanted from credible allegations that Robert Maxwell, father of Ghislaine, worked with the Mossad."
btw & to counter balance.........
Here is recent Tucker podcast, covers Epstein & Maxwell ties to Mossad & CIA.
-
-
@nevvertoofar said in Epstein Cover-up by Trump Administration:
@hubrys what if both trump and biden are on the list?
that's comical, Trump and Epstein were close friends for over 15 years. Trump wrote him birthday cards. Trump is on the flight logs. Biden did none of that
-
@cp2000 that's comical.... as it's debunked.
Bits you just said there, are already debunked. Please catch up.
-
USA-DOJ says: nobody asked Ghislaine Maxwell, for Epstein clients.
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1947622027587723365
Statement from @DAGToddBlanche:
This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead.
The joint statement by the DOJ and FBI of July 6 remains as accurate today as it was when it was written. Namely, that in the recent thorough review of the files maintained by the FBI in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. [ed:clients]
President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.
Therefore, at the direction of Attorney General Bondi, I have communicated with counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department.
I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days. Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now.
But here is weird part: MAYBE TRUE.
Maxwell was prosecuted under Biden-Kamabla. Why would they ask her?
CIA might ask her.
But old DOJ-FBI, to avoid any cases against Deep State or libs, would avoid question. & Maxwell seeing that, might also. "Don't ask, don't tell."
shorter - Trump "DOJ to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell...in coming days"
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-doj-to-meet-with-ghislaine-maxwell
Congress wants in:
HAHAHAHAHAhahahahahha
even Libs want ittrump got libs to do meme
-
updates
- Libs FRANTIC to paint Trump as one of themselves - as Epstein client or pedo.
Hakim Jeffries vid - https://x.com/i/status/1948044716064571576
"It is reasonable to conclude......."
means Hakim got nothing.
- Trump DOJ has sued to get Epstein stuff out. Judges block it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/federal-judge-kills-trump-plan-185716431.html
- MSNBC says John Kerry is in Epstein files.
vid - https://x.com/i/status/1948370832784306289
-
-
"You ought to be talking about Bill Clinton, who went to the island 28 times. I never went to the island. Hedge fund guys, Larry Summers." - Trump comment.
video - https://x.com/i/status/1948743669135139067
Meanwhile: Trump officials meet with Ghislaine Maxwell.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said that past reports that she was interviewed by state and federal authorities were not true, and that she may be an "untapped source of new information" in the Epstein case.
"I was surprised, in speaking with a member of the legal defense team a couple days ago, when they said that reports that she had been previously interviewed by federal and state prosecutors [and] investigators was not true. She has never been interviewed. Yes, and despite all of these past investigations in this scandal, I was really taken aback by that. So if that's true, she could be an untapped source of new information.
Info sought by Trump.................. .......... not by Dems
@serenity use your words
-
@blablarg18 I do not know, who went to these places, because the papiers are not out. Trump seems directly involved though Epstein´s own words. And if Trump was innocent, he would had released all files, as he said before.
-
If Trump were guilty of something related to Epstein, Biden and Co would have prosecuted him.
Trump was prosecuted for overinflating the value of his property, despite the banks saying they didn't have an issue with it. Jon Stewart infamously overinflated the value of his property many times greater than Trump was accused of, and was never prosecuted. Democrat Rep Jerry Nadler also overvalued his property greater than Trump did and was never prosecuted.
Trump faced targeted lawfare by the Democrats.
So don't give me that crap.
-
@raphjd I do not believe that I have written anything about overinflating values of properties.
Overinflating values of properties are a problem for loangivers, because of obvious reasons.
Didn't knew that about Jon Stewart. And Jerry Nadler, I do not know.
If Trump stayed within the laws, there should not be anything to come after. But he does not stay within the laws. And it is a surprise that Democrats take Trump to court many times, when the US has the most lawyers in the world.
Trump does also file many lawsuits, when he hears that he doesn't like.
And for Epstein many rightwing commentators are angry with Trump, because he has not released all the papires. You should know that by now. But I do not know, why the Democrats have not released the papires. Maybe you should asked a Democrat about that, as you know, I am not a Democrat. Can't even vote for them, or the GOP. -
You are making excuses for lawfare by the Democrats. Justice is supposed to be blind, not politically biased.
The difference is that Trump files lawsuits on his own; he does not use taxpayer money to do it, like Democrats do.
Yes, I'm not happy that Trump did not release the documents. Trump not releasing the Epstein files is not proof that he's implicated in them. If they did implicate Trump or anyone close to Trump, then the Democrats would have prosecuted him or, at the very least, used it to claim he was part of it.
I know you are not an American, but you are a leftist.
-
@raphjd "Justice is supposed to be blind, not politically biased." you are so right here, but the US has the problem at that the judges are political put in. And that is especially clear after the Supreme Court has a GOP mayority,
The Supreme Court goes women, gays and trans persons, and one by one taking there rights away.
Some Supreme Judges have said that they want to take rights away from gay people.
Yes, I am a leftist, but the democrats in the US are not leftists in most of Europe. -
Before Trump 45, the SCOTUS was liberal.
Leftist judges are trying to stop Trump at every turn. In some cases, they are even ignoring legal precedent and SCOTUS rulings.
Biden even admitted he was only going to appoint a token, black woman. That is the infamous "I'm not a biologist" KJB.
Even in the UK, judges are extremely political.
-
@raphjd Before 45 Trump I believe that there were 2 blocks and one independent.
Just as Trump doesn´t believe in equality, Biden has the right to believe in equality.
Trump admitted only MAGA judges, even when it was clear that they lied and wasn´t qualified to that position.
Legal precendents can be changed, they have also been changed sometimes. Trump is also ignoring SCOTUS rulings. He even wants to change illegal the Constitution regarding Birth Right citizens. I understand why, he wants to change that, but it must be done legally and the right way.
