Hillary Clinton says social media companies need to moderate content or 'we lose total control'
-
She used to support 230 before Musk bought Twitter. Now that it's not controlled by the DNC, she wants 230 repealed.
-
@raphjd Hillary and the democraps in general support anything that benefits them, and attack anything that hurts them. Even if it is the SAME issue. I guarantee you that if the democrats determined that they would get more votes by being anti-abortion - they would condemn abortion as murder night and day.
They have flipped 180 degrees on things like gay marriage, racism (they are the party of the KKK), and freedom of speech. Remember that the same cadre of the senior democraps were insisting Joe Biden was "sharp as a tack" just one week before forcing him to abandon his presidential campaign.The democraps were behind having Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and other platforms not just censor anything that conflicted with their liberal crap, they even forced those companies to BAN the accounts of people like President Trump AND several of my accounts!
Never forget that the party of IMPOSING regulations and taking AWAY your freedoms is the democraps. If Kambama wins, you can probably say "goodbye" to all gay porn torrent sites.
-
@raphjd Relevance of 230..... Without 230, any given media company can be either
-
publisher: aware & responsible for all content they put out, can be sued, can censor user & 3rd party content
-
distributor: unaware & not responsible for any content they put out; can't be sued & also can't censor
230 was special carve-out to say, social media companies are half of each... they can't be sued / are not responsible for content they put out...... ..... and yet, they can censor.
I can live with repeal. To that extent, Hillary's position is OK.
Repeal would force social media companies to declare themselves as either publishers - able to be sued for, say, "Russia Russia Russia" defamatory hoax that Hillary promoted, and other lib hoaxes - or as distributors, unable to censor users.
Her Freudian slip, that she wants "total control", is creepy part & what libs really want.
-
-
@lololulu19 said in Hillary Clinton says social media companies need to moderate content or 'we lose total control':
If Kambama wins, you can probably say "goodbye" to all gay porn torrent sites.
Once again, your general ignorance of the real world has led you to make false assumptions. Torrent sites (all of them) are already illegal in many countries due to copyright laws. As for pornography, the push to make it illegal and imprison producers is coming from your buddies on the right (ie Project 2025).
Get out of your silo and read.
-
Here are a couple of definitions from the Democrat dictionary.
- murdering healthy babies: Heathcare for women
- free and fair elections: elections that allow votes from dead people and illegal immigrants, and votes to be counted multiple times through the machines
- moderating social media content: banning any accounts that criticize democrats including those of President Trump
- unbiased journalism: only participating in debates and interviews with platforms that are extremely hostile to Donald Trump
- equal rights for everyone: unless you are white and especially male, then you are a pariah
- right: wrong
-
@lololulu19 You are such a waste of oxygen. There are some stupid posters here, but no one even comes close to you.
-
@raphjd She's wrong. We have already lost control. "We" meaning people who actually care about facts. Look at your idiot sidekick lololulu19. He not only appears to get all his "information" from social media, he is not bright enough to discern fact from propaganda. This board is full of crap from social media and "alternative" journalism. No one can talk to each other because they can't even agree on basic. It's like arguing with religious zealots. Or drunks.
-
But YOU people don't care about facts as long as they fit your narrative.
-
@raphjd Right. More Fox Nooz, please...lol
-
-
Think of all the shit over the last several years that your "true journalism" told you, which you readily believed, that turned out to be a lie.
Hell, your "true journalism" in Australia intentionally edited a video to falsely create a war crime. The head of ABC and those involved still refuse to apologize for that.
The list is never-ending.
-
-
-
"Eight years ago today, Hillary tweeted that 'computer scientists' had uncovered a Trump-Russia link."
"What she did not mention was that those 'computer scientists' were her own campaign operatives and that she had orchestrated the entire hoax. No one has ever been held to account"
Reference is
-
yesterday Oct 31
-
8 years since Jake Sullivan statement below..... THAT Jake Sullivan, Kamabla adviser
-
and Hillary operatives faked what data he mentions. THEY. LITERALLY. FAKED. NETWORK. LOGS.
-
to boost Russiagate / Spygate / Russia Russia Russia
To fake evidence & mislead FBI, is supposed to be crime.
Supposed to be.
But, you see, WE peasants are not supposed to know they faked it.
Because it's soooo important for Hillary to "have total control".
LIBS: that is what you support.
-
-
Dems have been lying for years, especially about Trump.
