Circumcision Experience and Style
-
Hi. I am keen on circumcision and like cut cocks. I'm uncut myself and considering to get myself cut. Is there's anyone who has gotten cut when they're a teenager/adult? If so, how did it go? Was it painful? Furthermore, which circumcision style did you opt for?
Thanks!
-
In my experience, lots of cut guys like uncut cocks, and lots of uncut guys like cut cocks. I think there's something appealing about another guy's cock being "different" from one's own. If that's the case, you might find yourself liking uncut cocks after you are circumcised.
One thing to consider is that once you are circumcised, the result might or might not be to your liking, and there's no "undo" button like we have on the computer. I won't offer an opinion one way or the other about getting it done, other than to suggest that you be very sure of your decision if you do it,
Perhaps it would help to experience lots of other guys' cocks, both cut and uncut. That might give you data to aid in making your decision…and if not, it would be a lot of fun ;D
-
As far as circumcision "styles" go, the American version is pretty much a complete removal of foreskin. The only different style I ever noticed is on many guys from the Philippines, where the surgeon leaves a bit of extra skin on the underside of the penis.
I never asked the guys whether that technique was designed for comfort, protection or pleasure. And I don't know if any other styles exist…!
(In the fetish community, you may find other foreskin-manipulation "styles" that are quite intriguing/alarming, but that doesn't sound like your direction.)
-
Styles? Never heard it stated that way.
I am American & uncut.
The variation of the cut has changed through history as a result of ignorance, religious practices, some (in)correct medical studies, and social stupidity.
Most people think that the circumcision typically seen on American men is the norm since & from biblical times.
It is NOT based on what my very Jewish doctors taught my parents and I.
Many people believe Abraham had not fathered a child because the ejaculates travel was hindered by his own skin. Then came "thus saith the Lord" with a practical remedy. Circumcision.
The original cuts then left most of the skin intact that covered the head (glans) only removing enough skin to leave the urethral orifice exposed as the skin still had it's purpose. That has changed through time to total removal of the foreskin that we see as the "normal" & accepted form of circumcision that we see today.
My parents decided to leave me intact as that is the way I was born & they are very much Christian. They believed then that being uncircumcised did not harm man. With proper care and cleanliness they felt I would never have a problem.
When doctors went to cut me at birth (without their permission) they put a stop to it. When I was 5 a new to us doctor decided I needed to be cut and told them he was going to do it. Again…. this was his decision without their consent. They put a stop to it and he told them them he would not care for an uncut child as it was a death sentence.
They always had a time finding a doctor who knew how to care for a child with foreskin. I always ended up with a Jewish doctor until leaving for college.
Their religious practices especially equipped them for my care. Most doctors will rip the foreskin during examinations as they are not accustomed to having patients with fully intact skin &/or typically subscribe to the "foreskin is bad" way of thought.
My family GP (Jewish Christian man) "Circumcision is a rite... NOT a requirement religiously if you're any form of Christian or even needed physically UNLESS there is an acute medical need" when I asked about why he never encouraged my parents or me to get the cut. He was actually put off by people's refusal to accept that it isn't a requirement outside specific medical need. He would also add, "You don't see Jewish boys dropping dead before the age of brit (13) for simply being uncut."
I will be likened to the original application where ONLY enough of my hood is removed to ensure the urethral opening is exposed when erect if I ever choose to get cut. I doubt I ever will though.
Not sure if that's what you mean, but it is my experience.
And flozen is right. It is a LOT of wanting what you don't have. Cut guys I've been with often have a known or newly discovered skin appreciation or outright fetish... especially when it's the first uncut one they've had. More meaningful conversations with some guys often include them telling me what they heard about how it feels, the fact that they want to experience it first hand, that they wish they could have chosen for themselves, and all the positives & negatives usually thrown about.
Even had one guy who refused me cause he just knew uncut dicks were "dirty". The bet was... if his was cleaner than mine then he would be the 1st guy to ever top me. Needless to say he enjoyed the skin.
>:D 
-
This post is deleted! -
Styles? Never heard it stated that way.
I am American & uncut.
The variation of the cut has changed through history as a result of ignorance, religious practices, some (in)correct medical studies, and social stupidity.
Most people think that the circumcision typically seen on American men is the norm since & from biblical times.
It is NOT based on what my very Jewish doctors taught my parents and I.
Many people believe Abraham had not fathered a child because the ejaculates travel was hindered by his own skin. Then came "thus saith the Lord" with a practical remedy. Circumcision.
The original cuts then left most of the skin intact that covered the head (glans) only removing enough skin to leave the urethral orifice exposed as the skin still had it's purpose. That has changed through time to total removal of the foreskin that we see as the "normal" & accepted form of circumcision that we see today.
My parents decided to leave me intact as that is the way I was born & they are very much Christian. They believed then that being uncircumcised did not harm man. With proper care and cleanliness they felt I would never have a problem.
When doctors went to cut me at birth (without their permission) they put a stop to it. When I was 5 a new to us doctor decided I needed to be cut and told them he was going to do it. Again…. this was his decision without their consent. They put a stop to it and he told them them he would not care for an uncut child as it was a death sentence.
They always had a time finding a doctor who knew how to care for a child with foreskin. I always ended up with a Jewish doctor until leaving for college.
Their religious practices especially equipped them for my care. Most doctors will rip the foreskin during examinations as they are not accustomed to having patients with fully intact skin &/or typically subscribe to the "foreskin is bad" way of thought.
My family GP (Jewish Christian man) "Circumcision is a rite... NOT a requirement religiously if you're any form of Christian or even needed physically UNLESS there is an acute medical need" when I asked about why he never encouraged my parents or me to get the cut. He was actually put off by people's refusal to accept that it isn't a requirement outside specific medical need. He would also add, "You don't see Jewish boys dropping dead before the age of brit (13) for simply being uncut."
I will be likened to the original application where ONLY enough of my hood is removed to ensure the urethral opening is exposed when erect if I ever choose to get cut. I doubt I ever will though.
Not sure if that's what you mean, but it is my experience.
And flozen is right. It is a LOT of wanting what you don't have. Cut guys I've been with often have a known or newly discovered skin appreciation or outright fetish... especially when it's the first uncut one they've had. More meaningful conversations with some guys often include them telling me what they heard about how it feels, the fact that they want to experience it first hand, that they wish they could have chosen for themselves, and all the positives & negatives usually thrown about.
Even had one guy who refused me cause he just knew uncut dicks were "dirty". The bet was... if his was cleaner than mine then he would be the 1st guy to ever top me. Needless to say he enjoyed the skin.
>:D Wow. What an experience..
-
Styles? Never heard it stated that way.
I am American & uncut.
The variation of the cut has changed through history as a result of ignorance, religious practices, some (in)correct medical studies, and social stupidity.
Most people think that the circumcision typically seen on American men is the norm since & from biblical times.
It is NOT based on what my very Jewish doctors taught my parents and I.
Many people believe Abraham had not fathered a child because the ejaculates travel was hindered by his own skin. Then came "thus saith the Lord" with a practical remedy. Circumcision.
The original cuts then left most of the skin intact that covered the head (glans) only removing enough skin to leave the urethral orifice exposed as the skin still had it's purpose. That has changed through time to total removal of the foreskin that we see as the "normal" & accepted form of circumcision that we see today.
My parents decided to leave me intact as that is the way I was born & they are very much Christian. They believed then that being uncircumcised did not harm man. With proper care and cleanliness they felt I would never have a problem.
When doctors went to cut me at birth (without their permission) they put a stop to it. When I was 5 a new to us doctor decided I needed to be cut and told them he was going to do it. Again…. this was his decision without their consent. They put a stop to it and he told them them he would not care for an uncut child as it was a death sentence.
They always had a time finding a doctor who knew how to care for a child with foreskin. I always ended up with a Jewish doctor until leaving for college.
Their religious practices especially equipped them for my care. Most doctors will rip the foreskin during examinations as they are not accustomed to having patients with fully intact skin &/or typically subscribe to the "foreskin is bad" way of thought.
My family GP (Jewish Christian man) "Circumcision is a rite... NOT a requirement religiously if you're any form of Christian or even needed physically UNLESS there is an acute medical need" when I asked about why he never encouraged my parents or me to get the cut. He was actually put off by people's refusal to accept that it isn't a requirement outside specific medical need. He would also add, "You don't see Jewish boys dropping dead before the age of brit (13) for simply being uncut."
I will be likened to the original application where ONLY enough of my hood is removed to ensure the urethral opening is exposed when erect if I ever choose to get cut. I doubt I ever will though.
Not sure if that's what you mean, but it is my experience.
And flozen is right. It is a LOT of wanting what you don't have. Cut guys I've been with often have a known or newly discovered skin appreciation or outright fetish... especially when it's the first uncut one they've had. More meaningful conversations with some guys often include them telling me what they heard about how it feels, the fact that they want to experience it first hand, that they wish they could have chosen for themselves, and all the positives & negatives usually thrown about.
Even had one guy who refused me cause he just knew uncut dicks were "dirty". The bet was... if his was cleaner than mine then he would be the 1st guy to ever top me. Needless to say he enjoyed the skin.
>:D Wow! This is really interesting for someone who is new to the Americas. You definitely have an amazing experience to tell :cheesy2:
-
In my experience, it's the other way around
I'm uncut and I like uncut dicks and most of the uncut guys I have met love uncut dicks, as well.In my experience, lots of cut guys like uncut cocks, and lots of uncut guys like cut cocks. I think there's something appealing about another guy's cock being "different" from one's own. If that's the case, you might find yourself liking uncut cocks after you are circumcised.
One thing to consider is that once you are circumcised, the result might or might not be to your liking, and there's no "undo" button like we have on the computer. I won't offer an opinion one way or the other about getting it done, other than to suggest that you be very sure of your decision if you do it,
Perhaps it would help to experience lots of other guys' cocks, both cut and uncut. That might give you data to aid in making your decision…and if not, it would be a lot of fun ;D
-
Wow! This is really interesting for someone who is new to the Americas. You definitely have an amazing experience to tell :cheesy2:
Just getting back to the forum section. lol… Not new at all.
-
In my experience, lots of cut guys like uncut cocks, and lots of uncut guys like cut cocks. I think there's something appealing about another guy's cock being "different" from one's own. If that's the case, you might find yourself liking uncut cocks after you are circumcised.
One thing to consider is that once you are circumcised, the result might or might not be to your liking, and there's no "undo" button like we have on the computer. I won't offer an opinion one way or the other about getting it done, other than to suggest that you be very sure of your decision if you do it,
Perhaps it would help to experience lots of other guys' cocks, both cut and uncut. That might give you data to aid in making your decision…and if not, it would be a lot of fun ;D
That's a good point!
:love:
