Sponsors of terror ‘falling victim to evil they promote’ ‒ Trump on Tehran attak
-
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
-
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
Do you even read your own posts?
Trump offered condolences to at least 12 victims of terror attacks in Tehran (is that a bad thing to do?)
Trump said states (such as Iran) that sponsor terrorism fall victim to the terror they promote (Is that a wrong thing to say?)By the way, Iran is NOT fighting ISIS. Iran is fighting the rebels who are trying to take over Syria. There are at least 3 different powers in Syria. The official Syrian government (allied with Iran), ISIS, and the rebels. It is quite complex, and frankly, the people engaged in that war don't even understand what they are fighting for.
You can barely figure out how to wipe your own ass, so I don't think you will be offering any erudite commentary on the subject. -
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
Do you even read your own posts?
Trump offered condolences to at least 12 victims of terror attacks in Tehran (is that a bad thing to do?)
Trump said states (such as Iran) that sponsor terrorism fall victim to the terror they promote (Is that a wrong thing to say?)By the way, Iran is NOT fighting ISIS. Iran is fighting the rebels who are trying to take over Syria. There are at least 3 different powers in Syria. The official Syrian government (allied with Iran), ISIS, and the rebels. It is quite complex, and frankly, the people engaged in that war don't even understand what they are fighting for.
You can barely figure out how to wipe your own ass, so I don't think you will be offering any erudite commentary on the subject.So, by your logic, America and countries that arm ISIS (Saudis) should be attacked by terrorists they support?
The Trump WH seems to think so “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
-
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
Do you even read your own posts?
Trump offered condolences to at least 12 victims of terror attacks in Tehran (is that a bad thing to do?)
Trump said states (such as Iran) that sponsor terrorism fall victim to the terror they promote (Is that a wrong thing to say?)By the way, Iran is NOT fighting ISIS. Iran is fighting the rebels who are trying to take over Syria. There are at least 3 different powers in Syria. The official Syrian government (allied with Iran), ISIS, and the rebels. It is quite complex, and frankly, the people engaged in that war don't even understand what they are fighting for.
You can barely figure out how to wipe your own ass, so I don't think you will be offering any erudite commentary on the subject.So, by your logic, America and countries that arm ISIS (Saudis) should be attacked by terrorists they support?
The Trump WH seems to think so “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Congratulations on nearly posting something that makes sense for the first time EVER!
Even though you are being biased, you mostly got it right. Trump did say that "states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote". Saudi Arabia doesn't directly sponsor terrorism, but they have been known to appease groups that threaten them rather than get into conflicts. There are many billionaires in Saudi Arabia, and those individual families are routinely coerced and blackmailed into funding things such as terrorism. And.. as Trump said.. such behaviors wind up coming back to haunt them.
Again, you moonbats can't make up your minds. If Trump doesn't fire Comey.. you bitch. If Trump does fire Comey, you bitch. If Trump picks on Muslims, you bitch. If Trump doesn't pick on Muslims, you bitch. Just WHICH Muslims would you like President Trump to be nice to? Those sweet, innocent, peace loving Iranians? Those darling Syrians? Or maybe you want Trump to kiss the asses of ISIS directly the way Obama did? -
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
Do you even read your own posts?
Trump offered condolences to at least 12 victims of terror attacks in Tehran (is that a bad thing to do?)
Trump said states (such as Iran) that sponsor terrorism fall victim to the terror they promote (Is that a wrong thing to say?)By the way, Iran is NOT fighting ISIS. Iran is fighting the rebels who are trying to take over Syria. There are at least 3 different powers in Syria. The official Syrian government (allied with Iran), ISIS, and the rebels. It is quite complex, and frankly, the people engaged in that war don't even understand what they are fighting for.
You can barely figure out how to wipe your own ass, so I don't think you will be offering any erudite commentary on the subject.So, by your logic, America and countries that arm ISIS (Saudis) should be attacked by terrorists they support?
The Trump WH seems to think so “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Congratulations on nearly posting something that makes sense for the first time EVER!
Even though you are being biased, you mostly got it right. Trump did say that "states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote". Saudi Arabia doesn't directly sponsor terrorism, but they have been known to appease groups that threaten them rather than get into conflicts. There are many billionaires in Saudi Arabia, and those individual families are routinely coerced and blackmailed into funding things such as terrorism. And.. as Trump said.. such behaviors wind up coming back to haunt them.
Again, you moonbats can't make up your minds. If Trump doesn't fire Comey.. you bitch. If Trump does fire Comey, you bitch. If Trump picks on Muslims, you bitch. If Trump doesn't pick on Muslims, you bitch. Just WHICH Muslims would you like President Trump to be nice to? Those sweet, innocent, peace loving Iranians? Those darling Syrians? Or maybe you want Trump to kiss the asses of ISIS directly the way Obama did?Your post was a complete word salad of no substance. Don't make this about religion because its not about ideology. Trump claimed that Saudi Arabia may have been behind 9/11 if you look at the documents. Now it is hypocritical that once he signed a deal giving them billions of dollars, we are seeing many terrorist attacks in the west and in countries that are enemies of Saudi Arabia.
-
Certain people are too stupid to realize/remember/admit that Obama also did deals with Saudi, even though they were known to fund terrorism.
-
Certain people are too stupid to realize/remember/admit that Obama also did deals with Saudi, even though they were known to fund terrorism.
So? Anyone arming the Saudis is bad, what's your point?
-
Are you stupid enough to believe Hillary or Bernie would have done any different?
So what is the problem with Trump doing it? Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen.
So stop with the partisan bullshit.
-
Are you stupid enough to believe Hillary or Bernie would have done any different?
So what is the problem with Trump doing it? Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen.
So stop with the partisan bullshit.
-
They probably would have done the same, doesn't make it any better.
-
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist sponsoring state.
-
"Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen." Um, last time I checked Jesus Christ was not the president.
-
Seeing everyone who does not agree with you as having the same views is being bigoted.
-
-
The White House has sent condolences to Iran after at least 12 people were killed in terrorist bomb and gun attacks in Tehran, but then lectured that “states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
“We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times,” the White House said in a statement in response to the Tuesday attacks. “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.”
Oh the irony! Trump's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $100+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Trump is in bed with zionist/puppet-masters. Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Trumpkins defend him?
https://www.rt.com/usa/391291-trump-white-house-tehran-terrorist-attacks/
I seriously don't get how you're turning this into an attack on Trump. Not much to do with it.
Also, doing a service to bump threads past the low effort spam. Bump
-
Are you stupid enough to believe Hillary or Bernie would have done any different?
So what is the problem with Trump doing it? Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen.
So stop with the partisan bullshit.
-
They probably would have done the same, doesn't make it any better.
-
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist sponsoring state.
-
"Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen." Um, last time I checked Jesus Christ was not the president.
-
Seeing everyone who does not agree with you as having the same views is being bigoted.
"bigoted" lol
At least you are partially being honest.
Obama is the lord and saviour of liberal.
It's funny how liberals weren't really that bothered when Obama was doing deals with Saudi, but lose their rags because Trump is.
-
-
Are you stupid enough to believe Hillary or Bernie would have done any different?
So what is the problem with Trump doing it? Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen.
So stop with the partisan bullshit.
-
They probably would have done the same, doesn't make it any better.
-
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist sponsoring state.
-
"Your lord and saviour did it for the last 8 years and regardless who is President, it will always happen." Um, last time I checked Jesus Christ was not the president.
-
Seeing everyone who does not agree with you as having the same views is being bigoted.
"bigoted" lol
At least you are partially being honest.
Obama is the lord and saviour of liberal.
It's funny how liberals weren't really that bothered when Obama was doing deals with Saudi, but lose their rags because Trump is.
I wouldn't even put Obama at the level of "liberal". I think he actually believed he was some muslim descendant of Mohammad.. given the name "Barack" which is the name of Mohammad's evil winged black horse. He felt it was his destiny to bring the USA down and elevate muslims & terrorists. Or am I being too harsh?
![😕](https://community.gaytorrent.ru/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/apple/1f615.png?v=hvqg2qn0nb4 ":-\")
-
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.
You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.
You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.
It's OK when liberals do it.
-
Sad to see the typical purveyors of anti-Muslim/anti-liberal bigotry have invested this post. No discussion between the different ideologies followed by Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia), and why they hate one another.
I guess its easier to be bigoted than to think critically.
Your opening post declared your partisan view of the topic.
You didn't want to talk about anything other than Trump.
How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.
I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.
On a side note: It is ironic how those on the right say they support free speech, but then whine about downvotes and people opposing their views.
-
How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.
I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.
It's called being Intellectually Honest.
What you are doing is called Intellectual Dishonesty. It is blatantly obvious to literally everyone that you wouldn't criticize any other democratic president in the same way, because, well you haven't. Let's see if this post is something anyone could see you writing:
Oh the irony! Barack's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $115 billion+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Libtards defend him?
No, of course not, you didn't write that post at the time, and you would never write that post about Hillary either.
Because, let's face it:
-
How so? Opening a topic generally means you discuss that topic.
I'm talking about the comment made by the Trump WH towards this terrorist attack, not being partisan, just critical of it.
It's called being Intellectually Honest.
What you are doing is called Intellectual Dishonesty. It is blatantly obvious to literally everyone that you wouldn't criticize any other democratic president in the same way, because, well you haven't. Let's see if this post is something anyone could see you writing:
Oh the irony! Barack's support of Saudi Wahhabism by his $115 billion+ billion arms deal is what is fueling terrorism! Iran is fighting ISIS!
How will Libtards defend him?
No, of course not, you didn't write that post at the time, and you would never write that post about Hillary either.
Because, let's face it:
Your post is nonsense, I'm critical of the president and regardless of the party they belong to. I know Obama's admin was working towards the Saudi deal, but Trump was the one who signed it.
I hope that Congress can overrule him with the help of good republicans like Sen. Rand Paul.
-
Your post is nonsense, I'm critical of the president and regardless of the party they belong to. I know Obama's admin was working towards the Saudi deal, but Trump was the one who signed it.
Obama didn't just propose a deal, he actively sold weapons to Saudi Arabia throughout his presidency.
Ah, so maybe you were being truthful about criticizing regardless of party, but were just ill informed? Maybe you would've criticized Obama too, if you knew he also sold billions of dollars to SA? Yes/no?
-
"Obama’s Administration Sold More Weapons Than Any Other Since World War II"
Are you going to criticize Obama now that you know?
