Liberals win; smoking gun found
-
Proof Trump needs to join Bill Clinton on the list of impeached Presidents.
-
Isn't that the proof that Trump to prove he didn't collude with Russia? He literally gave a letter that was signed by a lawyer that said he didn't do it. lol
-
Proof Trump needs to join Bill Clinton on the list of impeached Presidents.
Yes.. I saw that letter on CNN's "Breaking News"
-
Ha Ha, very funny. Trump will be impeached, either new evidence will come of his ties to Russia or he will abuse his presidential authority.
-
I know you meant this as a joke and I did chuckle. It's not so funny when the President does it.
-
Proof Trump needs to join Bill Clinton on the list of impeached Presidents.
How time flies. It was only yesterday that you complained about liberals not offering detailed responses about Trump, his administration, their collusion with Russia, and his greasy slide toward impeachment.
So, soon after your challenge on the thread, "With Friends Like Those," in reply #18, I wrote a detailed summation of these points, with citations. If you didn't get a chance, you now have an opportunity to read and respond to exactly what you asked for.
Tick, tock.
Doing that would be so much more useful than the silly image above, which would make little more than a refrigerator magnet. Whether you're just lazy or out of defensible responses, it is being noticed.
-
That looks like Trump's writing, he's probably tired of being president.
-
Yeah, Russia hacking Americans is so funny and hilarious. The possibility that our current president and/or his administration helped a foreign power hack Americans is funny and hilarious, right?
-
Proof Trump needs to join Bill Clinton on the list of impeached Presidents.
How time flies. It was only yesterday that you complained about liberals not offering detailed responses about Trump, his administration, their collusion with Russia, and his greasy slide toward impeachment.
So, soon after your challenge on the thread, "With Friends Like Those," in reply #18, I wrote a detailed summation of these points, with citations. If you didn't get a chance, you now have an opportunity to read and respond to exactly what you asked for.
Tick, tock.
Doing that would be so much more useful than the silly image above, which would make little more than a refrigerator magnet. Whether you're just lazy or out of defensible responses, it is being noticed.
Don't waste your time - unless someone's posting reputable citations themselves, it's more efficient to mock their idiocy and move on. These people are like flat-earthers… willfully ignorant. Facts don't play much part in their lives.
-
Yeah, Russia hacking Americans is so funny and hilarious. The possibility that our current president and/or his administration helped a foreign power hack Americans is funny and hilarious, right?
It's funny because you guys constantly assert this ALLEGATION that has no actual proof. With Hillary for example, she literally deleted 30K emails AFTER a subpoena. And I'm not going back to the Hildabeast to shift or change the subject, because there is no better analogy. There literally is proof there, that you cannot deny, and you refuse to admit it, when it's not debatable. Your allegations are empty.
-
I appreciate your point, karashi, but there is a certain usefulness in calling out posters – like raphjd -- who make spurious claims without any evidence, even when you ask repeatedly for reputable sources.
At the very least, new members get an early start on identifying the local "political idiocy" -- the single-minded defenders of our corrupt Trump Administration -- whose diatribes are either uncited, or from alt-right sources that, ironically, hate our kind.
As well, writing sane and cogent responses offers some relief from the sad and purposeless man who just posted above me, who believes the magical incantation of "Hillary" turns any unrelated topic into spun gold.
For me, that's enough reason to type.
-
I appreciate your point, karashi, but there is a certain usefulness in calling out posters – like raphjd -- who make spurious claims without any evidence, even when you ask repeatedly for reputable sources.
At the very least, new members get an early start on identifying the local "political idiocy" -- the single-minded defenders of our corrupt Trump Administration -- whose diatribes are either uncited, or from alt-right sources that, ironically, hate our kind.
As well, writing sane and cogent responses offers some relief from the sad and purposeless man who just posted above me, who believes the magical incantation of "Hillary" turns any unrelated topic into spun gold.
For me, that's enough reason to type.
Nah, there is literally NO proof behind your CLAIM. Hillary on the other hand, there IS proof, that you want to deny. Like deleting 30,000 emails AFTER a subpoena!!! But you don't want to address that, do ya!? Literal proof, vs no proof. BIG difference. Your propaganda isn't going to work!
-
I appreciate your point, karashi, but there is a certain usefulness in calling out posters – like raphjd -- who make spurious claims without any evidence, even when you ask repeatedly for reputable sources.
At the very least, new members get an early start on identifying the local "political idiocy" -- the single-minded defenders of our corrupt Trump Administration -- whose diatribes are either uncited, or from alt-right sources that, ironically, hate our kind.
As well, writing sane and cogent responses offers some relief from the sad and purposeless man who just posted above me, who believes the magical incantation of "Hillary" turns any unrelated topic into spun gold.
For me, that's enough reason to type.
Nah, there is literally NO proof behind your CLAIM. Hillary on the other hand, there IS proof, that you want to deny. Like deleting 30,000 emails AFTER a subpoena!!! But you don't want to address that, do ya!? Literal proof, vs no proof. BIG difference. Your propaganda isn't going to work!
And you make our day a little brighter by going right back to Hillary. Bless you, the self-fulfilling prophecy that just keeps on giving.
-
And you keep denying reality, PROOF, vs NO PROOF. More EVASION of the FACTS that expose your hypocrisy so perfectly.
-
I appreciate your point, karashi, but there is a certain usefulness in calling out posters – like raphjd -- who make spurious claims without any evidence, even when you ask repeatedly for reputable sources.
At the very least, new members get an early start on identifying the local "political idiocy" -- the single-minded defenders of our corrupt Trump Administration -- whose diatribes are either uncited, or from alt-right sources that, ironically, hate our kind.
As well, writing sane and cogent responses offers some relief from the sad and purposeless man who just posted above me, who believes the magical incantation of "Hillary" turns any unrelated topic into spun gold.
For me, that's enough reason to type.
What a clown.
I don't like Trump. Hating modern liberals is not the same as being a fan of Trump.
I have provided my proof by naming individuals, who you could look up. If you are too fucking lazy to find out who Milo Stewart is, then that is on you. Also, if you are demanding proof of things we have constantly go over in the past, such as feminist topics, then you can simply go back and look at those topics here.
It was your fellow liberals that kept demanding I provide proof over and over, while your fellow liberals got butt hurt because I kept posting the same links in countless threads. Yeah, yeah, I know it's game you people love to play.
-
Your reply comes at a great time, as your pal, in the post above you, is simply consumed by the simple existence of the word proof, extruded multiple times and in "CRAZY CAPS," with no topical focus.
You're not at that level, thank god, but at the same time I'm not your librarian, and you can't rely on some magical "fact archive" as you make one dubious post after another. Like a math test, show evidence of your work/claims if you expect to get credit.
-
LOL, you are really that fucking lazy to look up Milo Stewart, aren't you. Damned useless liberals. No wonder you guys are always so clueless.
Do a bit of work for yourself once in a while, instead of demanding that everyone spoon feed you everything. Grow up and stop demanding momma breast feed you.
-
Your reply comes at a great time, as your pal, in the post above you, is simply consumed by the simple existence of the word proof, extruded multiple times and in "CRAZY CAPS," with no topical focus.
You're not at that level, thank god, but at the same time I'm not your librarian, and you can't rely on some magical "fact archive" as you make one dubious post after another. Like a math test, show evidence of your work/claims if you expect to get credit.
Well quit denying the FACT that Hillary DID in FACT delete 30,000 emails AFTER a subpoena! It's REALITY!!! That is an OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!!! PERIOD! You can IGNORE that ALL you want!!! LOL But it's SO OBVIOUS that you just can't ACCEPT REALITY!!! She DID do that! You KNOW it! And you want to PRETEND that it didn't happen and INSTEAD talk about TRUMP!!! You KNOW she did it. And you KNOW it's a FEDERAL CRIME!!! Quit LYING to yourself!!! LOL It's RIDICULOUS!!!
-
LOL, you are really that fucking lazy to look up Milo Stewart, aren't you. Damned useless liberals. No wonder you guys are always so clueless.
Do a bit of work for yourself once in a while, instead of demanding that everyone spoon feed you everything. Grow up and stop demanding momma breast feed you.
We have never had a direct conversation where I have mentioned Milo, or illustrated a lack of information about Milo. You are either thinking of someone else's conversation, or just throwing out name-bait as an aid in writing a 45-second response.
Cursing is also a nice way to represent the site in your stated capacity as forum administrator, or is that something you get via sheer keystroke volume? F-word moderators get no props from me, sorry.
-
I used Milo Stewart as an example of you people demanding proof, despite me making it so easy to find out more on your own.
The same applies to other topics.
So sorry I offended your delicate liberal ears with a word. No I'm not.
Besides, I post as me, not a forum admin unless you see the thing I wrote about in the rules. Maybe you should check that out.
