I don't understand his comment at all. I've been following cases of people being killed by cops for over 50 years - I started back around 1970 when in two separate cases, two unarmed, innocent children were shot in the back by two murdering pigs - both of the unarmed, innocent children died - both of the murdering pigs walked away. In one case the father was a prominent member of his community and did everything in his power to bring the murdering pig to justice but was not able to do so. He left the community. When a cop commits a crime it is a far greater offense than when a civilian commits the exact same crime because the cop was sworn to stop such offenses. Therefore, in a country that practices capitol punishment there should be mandatory execution for murdering pigs. Another reason is because we may have the same laws for everyone on paper, but in actual practice what we really have is one set of laws for the pigs and another set of laws for the tax payers who feed and clothe their wives and children. That undermines the credibility of the entire criminal justice system. I don't believe that even one murdering pig in this country has ever been executed. And my remarks are not mere inflammatory rhetoric -I have supported my assertion with reason and logic - it is the words of those who defend the murdering pigs that are rhetoric.