Update - Reuters "fact checker" 🙄 numbers say, total shots went from 71 to 22, as diseases went from 17 to 11.

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/new-us-childhood-vaccine-plan-cuts-number-shots-around-23-not-11-2026-01-14/

Even with those numbers....

number of shots cut by 2/3 or more

which pulls USA damaging krazy vaxx schedule, back into line with world norms & science

Covid boosters weaken ur body's anti-covid response:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40113142/

https://www.malone.news/p/what-your-covid-booster-did-to-your

tldr;

if ur immune system sees some invader again & again, in safe context like shots, it learns to respond to that thing with its weakest antibody type, ig4

effect can be GOOD; it's how allergy shots work

but not good with viruses

mRNA vaxx, Pfizer & Moderna, have molecular details which weirdly magnify that effect. (Natural infections don't. "other" vaxx, A-Z or J-J or Novavax, that are not mRNA, don't.)

if u had 3 or more jabs, ur body has learned to make ig4 type antibodies, for covid

ur not doomed, but u may get more covid infections

What is documented

Increased risk of breakthrough COVID infection

Martín Pérez et al. (2025) found that healthcare workers who developed the IgG4 shift were more likely to get COVID afterward. This is the first published study to link the antibody shift to an actual adverse health outcome. It needs replication, but the direction is predicted by the biology.

Loss of the immune functions that clear infected cells

Kalkeri et al. (2025) directly measured the functional consequences. Higher IgG4 was correlated with reduced capacity for three distinct immune clearance mechanisms: ADCC (r = –0.53), complement deposition (r = –0.53), and phagocytosis (r = –0.40). These are not theories. They are published measurements.

The damage is written into immune memory

Irrgang et al. (Science Immunology, 2023) found that 14.4% of the long-term immune memory cells targeting the spike protein were IgG4-producing after repeated boosting. These cells persist for years. The impairment does not fade when vaccination stops.

Children are also affected

Kobbe et al. (Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2024) confirmed IgG4 switching in children aged 5 to 11 after only two standard pediatric doses. The effect is not limited to adults who received many boosters.

What is plausible but not yet confirmed

The following risks have not been confirmed in large studies...meaning the studies have not been done, not that the risks have been ruled out.

• IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD)...(see Malone article for more)

• Impaired cancer immune surveillance...

• Interference with cancer treatments...

• Weakened response to other vaccines and infections...

• Immunological imprinting...

• Autoantibody generation...

The most important point in this entire paper is that the same immune shift has completely different implications depending on who you are....

For people who are genuinely at high risk of severe COVID, repeated boosting is likely still the right call. COVID-19 kills primarily through excessive inflammation, not through direct viral damage. The IgG4 shift, which dampens that inflammatory response while maintaining the ability to neutralize the virus, may actually be protective for people whose biggest risk is the body’s own overreaction...

That said, even for this group, the evidence supports spacing boosters at least a year apart, considering lower doses, and possibly using a protein-subunit vaccine (like Novavax) for boosting to avoid amplifying the IgG4 shift...

For healthy adults [and children] who are not at elevated risk of severe COVID, the calculation is different. The individual risk of serious illness is very low. The benefits of additional boosters are small in absolute terms. And the adverse immune events documented here (loss of Fc clearance function, durable IgG4 memory encoding, immunological imprinting) are not offset by a commensurate benefit. Clinicians advising this group have an obligation to explain these trade-offs...

The findings for children are particularly concerning. Children face near-zero individual risk of severe COVID. The documented justification for vaccinating them rested almost entirely on reducing transmission to others. But the IgG4 shift produces an antibody profile that is poorly suited to preventing infection and transmission. And the shift occurs after only two standard pediatric doses, before any booster is even given...

[as to testing your antibody levels,] A high antibody number after multiple boosters may reflect protection. [OR, but,] It may also reflect a growing fraction of tolerance antibodies [the ig4 ones] that actively interfere with infection clearance. The test cannot tell you which.

@jujulette
yes i tried Selsun Blue once and i was best result i ever get
but in my country it's really expensive

As a lad we always had non-fat milk, which I didn't mind. When I went to university, I got 2% and enjoyed it very much. Now I treat myself to full-fat milk, although I don't have much of it.

That said, there's another white liquid that I enjoy drinking even more, but I digress.

Stanford proposes mechanism for how covid vaxx sometimes kill hearts of Men.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adq0143

Inhibition of CXCL10 and IFN-γ ameliorates myocarditis in preclinical models of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination

tldr;

if true, would apply to every mRNA / LPN vaxx that may come out, not only covid

vaxx escapes injection site, hits blood & organs

immune system detects foreign RNA itself as threat

immune system attacks various cells that harbor it, causes damage & inflamation thru out ur body. (auto-immune disease)

younger, male heart cells may especially get triggered to kill themselves. (new cause of carditis)

It's almost like someone either wanted to kill the young Men, or at least isn't too worried if it turns out that way.

In video form:

Youtube Video

USA "CDC stops recommending COVID-19 shots for all, leaves decision to patients"

https://apnews.com/article/cdc-vaccines-covid19-shots-b0183766e56b5d0e948904172193c891

tl;dr

Nothing taken away

Government just decided to -not- do illegal marketing for Big Pharma corporations

But "Major medical societies" still take Big Pharma cas$$$h. ⬇

Major medical societies continue to recommend shots for younger children, pregnant women and others at higher risk of severe illness. They say the Trump administration’s discussion of risk overemphasizes rare side effects and doesn’t account for the dangers of coronavirus infection itself.

Horrible. First, covid vaxx are tied to high miscarriage rates. (https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/63268/covid-vaxx-mess-with-women-s-cycles/4)

So much for pregnant women. Risk to fetus.

Second, kids have nearly (very rare exceptions) zero risk from covid disease. -Which covid vaxx don't stop anyway-. So, actually no benefit.

U can't say "But they don't account for dangers of coronavirus infection!" when, on average, poor covid vaxx products do as much "good" 🙄 as bloodletting or leeches.

Third, covid vaxx may give kids heart problems. Risk for no benefit.

South Korea study: Covid vaxx raise your overall cancer risk 27%.

https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w

Data from 8,407,849 individuals between 2021 and 2023 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancer were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and data were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs of thyroid (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.206–1.514), gastric (HR, 1.335; 95% CI, 1.130–1.576), colorectal (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.122–1.468), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.254–1.874), breast (HR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.069–1.340), and prostate (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.348–2.111) cancers significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination.

It's not any 1 covid vaxx, it's every one.

In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines [ed: Astra-Zeneca, J&J] were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines [ed: Moderna, Pfizer] were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination [ed: "mix and match"] was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-second-massive-population

5fe569f4-fa49-43d4-899f-8f9c3344da3e-82075d58-37d6-4beb-bd93-bb307820fd30_872x1100.jpg

Booster-Dose Analysis

Gastric cancer: HR 1.23 (p = 0.041) → 23% higher risk with boosters

Pancreatic cancer: HR 2.25 (p < 0.001) → 125% higher risk with boosters

Interpretation: Booster doses were associated with notably higher risks of gastric and pancreatic cancers. For pancreatic cancer, the risk more than doubled in boosted individuals.

Czech data, 2nd look, it's worse than I said.

Vaxxed women are overall only 2/3 as likely to give birth. It's not just miscarriage rate, it's overall live births.

f4a8a8f2-bc9d-46a8-9f48-073672f7f6a1-image.png

Again: What are exact causes?

Is it possible that Czech women who bought covid-vaxx hype or obeyed mandates, are simply more inclined to abortions? birth control? abstinence (doubtful)? ill health? disrupted cycles? infertile male partners?

But....wow. Major health alarm bell, needs explanation.......... that is, it needs study & headlines.

AI ranks our best-known RNA viruses by speed of mutation.

HIV: Highest mutation rate (~1–10 × 10⁻⁵ substitutions per site per replication cycle), driven by its error-prone reverse transcriptase. Influenza (Flu): ~1–8 × 10⁻³ substitutions per site per year, with rapid evolution due to antigenic drift and segmented genome. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2): ~1–2 × 10⁻³ substitutions per site per year, moderate among RNA viruses. RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus): ~1–2 × 10⁻³ substitutions per site per year, similar to COVID-19 but slightly variable in key genes. Measles: Lowest mutation rate (~0.6–1 × 10⁻³ substitutions per site per year), highly stable for an RNA virus.

This ranking reflects the relative mutation rates, with HIV mutating fastest and measles the slowest. Note that direct comparisons can be nuanced due to differences in replication cycles and genome sizes.

Remember:

RSV is fast enough for its vaxx products to make no sense & not work......... ............ topic here

same or worse ⬆ for flu & covid..... ........... yet those products are pushed on people?? It protects Big Pharma finances.

For fun, AI was asked if measles evolves slower than flu? (both RNA virus)

Yes, the measles virus evolves slower than many other RNA viruses, like influenza. Measles, caused by a morbillivirus, has a relatively stable genome due to its high fidelity RNA polymerase and strong selective pressure to maintain its antigenic structure for human infection. Its mutation rate is estimated at around 0.9–1.1 × 10⁻⁴ substitutions per site per year, which is lower than influenza's rate of ~1–5 × 10⁻³. Influenza evolves faster due to antigenic drift and shift, driven by a more error-prone polymerase and broader host range, allowing rapid adaptation. Measles' slower evolution contributes to the long-term effectiveness of its vaccine.

highlighting added