Posts made by raphjd

I didn't post as an admin because it's a function of the forums.

If I posted as an admin, then the liberals would have had a fit because I was stifling their "right" to downvote everything their enemies said.

@flozen:

Why is there a disproportionately higher number of thumbs down from progressives?

I'd say it has a lot to do with the disproportionately higher number of uncivil and off-topic posts, and other Forum rules violations, by conservatives.

This is backed up by the Warnings – given out only after repeated, repeated infractions -- and which tips heavily in the conservatives' direction.

What a shame you did all this pretty cut-and-pasting, and tabulating, when the conclusions were already as clear as your "Obama Is A Satanic Whore," or if you prefer, "The New World Order Can Suck My D-ck."

Thanks, mhorndisk, for enriching our political discussions with these downward, thumb-bending contributions, and so many, many others by you and your peers.

Actually, you are wrong about the high number of downvotes, at least from the 3 biggest offenders; DrWas, Sutie and wafflez.

They searched out posts from their enemies and downvoted them not matter the content.

RoyalCrown (think it was him) gave me a link and I thanked him; downvoted.    "Thanks  :hug: "  got me downvoted.

Ok, I can't speak for all the accusations against Michael Jackson, but at least 2 of them were blatantly false.

Jordan Chandler's dad wanted MJ to fund his movie and when MJ refused, he accused MJ of molesting Jordan.

The other one is the Hispanic woman who told wild stories reminiscent of the kids in the McMartin (faux) trial.  Underground tunnels to Mexico, using hot air balloons to cross the border and back.

I wanted this petty shit gone months ago, but you guys didn't give a shit since it was your side doing it to the "baddies".    Now that both sides are doing it, you guys want it gone.

If this shit stopped when I asked for people to stop it, then it wouldn't have blown up to what it is today.

Umm, it was your fellow liberals who made voting meaningless.

Even making non political, factual posts, such as the London Bridge attack was a single incident in two parts, got downvoted by liberals.  A generic description of the Trump beating up the CNN logo, for those hat hadn't seen it, was downvoted.

The "baddies" started doing reputation as revenge and now liberals are crying about it.

I'm not an EX-classic liberal, I am a classic liberal.

I refuse to wear the liberal name tag because of what modern liberals have done to it.

++++

Let's not forget the threads that called out conservative members, which were before this thread.    Would you have been happy if I punished those users?    I think not.

One of the rules is about lying about other users and staff.  Twice no Sutie has publicly accused me of using my admin status to "dox" him.  The first time it was explained that it was info open to all.    Shall I punish him for it, like I did for the last person who did a similar thing?  Liberals would have a fit.

Both sides have done many wrongs, but it's the liberals that are always crying for their enemies to by punished, while ignoring the sins of their own.

@pppucci:

@sutieday:

@pppucci:

Just don't vote. Boycott Voting!

Just like in the US, many didn't vote because the choices were bad…. Now look who is in charge.

But the way the system works, with your reputation power of 0, your vote literally does not count. Express your opinion instead.

WOW, a liberal finally telling another liberal not to hide behind downvoting but to actually say something.

Didn't someone say that months ago?!  Oh wait, I did.

@sutieday:

I just wanna debate politics! Watch tomorrow or in a few days the voting/rep features get removed due to conservative/rightwing/troll complaints…

You so funny    :crazy2:

If you look, this thread is you clowns crying about it.

I'm gonna remove the ability for users to lock threads.

Since you're writing directly in response to my post, where did I demand that "something must be done" about Reputation Power?

It's deceptive to insert that remark as you respond to my post, if your intent is to refer, instead, to some hazy group of others.

Do you ever put your cop hat on and have a good, long chat with yourself?

Please show me where I said YOU in my response.

I said LIBERALS, you know the group you and your loony buddies belong to.

Everyone in the group does not have to something to make the statement true.

It's related in that liberals tried using downvoting as a weapon.    This is extremely clear when they don't even read what is posted, but downvote strictly due to who posted it.

When conservatives started doing the same with reputation, liberals got butt hurt.

It aint all about you, dearie.

I was referring to Sutie's false claim that I doxed him using my admin status.

We had a similar discussion about this in a previous thread.  I was accused of using my mod status to out liberals for en masse downvoting their enemies.  I explained it then, yet here we are again.

As we saw in a previous thread about hate crimes, it's a massive case of over reporting.

If a 1 eyed, 3 nippled, trans, lesbian, muslim, woman is mugged (no hate based intent, just robbery) it's still recorded as 6 separate hate crimes.

Hate crimes are always listed against the right, even when it's 4 blacks against a mentally challenged white male.

I was falsely accused, yet again, by a liberal.

I don't think I found the SnigglyPuff video you are referring to.  The one I found shows her pushing a blonde, again apparently to knock the camera out of her hand.

It was after that.  I don't think there's video of it, but there was news articles about it.  She got arrested afterwards.  The cameras were still at the anti free speech event.

If you research her, you'll also find out that she false flagged her high school with homophobic graffiti.

"  Lauren Southern had piss poured over her head because she questioned SJWs. " I couldn't fins two separate videos, but the one I did find showed her being sprayed with a few drops of what was later identified as red fox urine, which is used to repel rodents and other pests.  Certainly unpleasant and unjustified, but it's not like someone peed in a bottle and poured it over her head.

I'm guessing you didn't try very hard.

"setting a girl's hair on fire for wearing a Trump hat. "  The girl in question smugly poses in front of anti-Trump protesters for a photo. Someone behind her takes a bic lighter to her hair, probably singeing a few strands.  It is actually difficult set someone's hair on fire without an accelerant. Certainly the only flame was the two second the bic was lit.

Failure to give her 3rd degree burns DOES NOT negate the intent.

"stop touching my breasts" incident where a women kept shouting that as an excuse to assault people" . This one is much as you describe.  That woman is bat-shit crazy and pushed someone off of a ledge.  She should be in jail.

Finally.

"feminist cuck who punched a woman reporter for asking an uncomfortable question about feminism. "  After watching the video, I am appalled that a man would strike a woman, but if you listen to the moment of the strike, and where it appears to land, It seems that he was trying to knock her camera away. She claims "you just punched me in the face." but didn't cry out in pain or even flinch when the punch landed.

I'm not appalled about the guy hitting a woman, as I'm an egalitarian.

I am appalled why he hit her.    He's a whiney little bitch and couldn't handle the questions, so he lashed out.

"Mouldylocks and her empty wine bottles" . I don't know what she was doing with her empty wine bottle.  I couldn't find any videos showing her using them as a weapon or throwing them. I suspect she wasn't drinking wine from them, and was probably up to no good.  The report that it was a Molotov Cocktail was debunked by snopes.  And you conveniently ignored what happened to her.:

She was there to riot.  She admitted as much on Facebook and Twitter.

Then, with the media's help, she played the total victim.

Snopes is now a leftist "fact" checker, so they could say it's overcast today and I wouldn't believe them, even though it's always overcast in Scotland.

Anyway, I didn't say she made/threw Molotov cocktails.

@flozen:

This thread was wrong-headed from the get-go.

If you have a beef with someone and you perceive it as a likely violation of the Forum's terms, then contact the Administrator directly.  Name-highlighting on thread titles is bush league.

As far as your concern about thumbs down – truly bigger than the G20 for you -- it's one of a dozen emojis available to evaluate each post, and forum members appear to have the right to never use them, or to use them as often as they please.

Meanwhile, you seem quite unconcerned by the green bar/red bar Reputation Power manipulation going on, as it's the conservatives playing with that statistic to their advantage.  The total posts from progressives on that topic?  Probably fewer than your own here, in this single-thread pity party.

You obviously needed some attention, and now you've had it, congratulations, perhaps someone will bake you a cake.

Liberals have used the downvote and liberals think there is nothing wrong with it.

As soon as conservatives start using the reputation, liberals are butt hurt demanding something must be done about it.

@sutieday:

Just when I thought leftist snowflakes were obnoxious….

So you know you're obnoxious.  Finally, some honesty from you.

@royalcrown89:

I agree 100% with the OP. The conservatives (and anti-liberals) either do not know how to defend their arguments/positions or are solely on here to troll liberals. I do not know which; hence, why I'm here asking now. I have defended my arguments/positions with sound logic without constant name-calling or other childish means. I have many times called out the problems–-often times dangerous---within the liberal communities. Where is it on the other side? Where is the self-criticism of the other side on here? It's extremely rare for some of you to (a) criticize the president and (b) criticize the actions of those on the right just as rare as it is for you to defend the president and the actions of those on the right. Do you truly believe what you say or are you only saying it to be a troll? One of the objectives in my call for more civility was to stop assuming bad intentions on the behalf of those you disagree with; therefore, the fact that I am indeed asking what your intentions are is proof that I am truly trying to get to the crux of this problem. I am not assuming the worst, I am asking why is there a lack of effort on the other side to defend their beliefs without constant name-calling and childishness and without deflecting to the problems of the other side.

What you call "deflecting to the problems of the other side", I call pointing out liberal hypocrisy.

@pppucci:

@raphjd:

It was a blatant lie by CNN to fit their narrative.

She DID NOT call for calm and peace.  She called for blacks to burn down the suburbs.

CNN knew this because they later posted their own "full" copy of the event.

You assign a motive to the mistake because it fits your narrative.  It may have been maliciously edited, or it may have been carelessly edited for time.

My point is if a YouTube user "BlacksforPeace" posted the edited video, how would know it had been edited? The media brings such things to light.  I don't use YouTube much, but are confident that a deceptively edited video will be exposed by another YouTube user and posted in the comments so you can easily find it?

Do you seriously believe that CNN edited out "take that shit to the suburbs and burn their shit down" by accident?    Or do you think they edited it out so they could claim she was calling for peace?

YouTube is extremely good at self cleaning/correcting.

Try a full log out and  log back in.

If it's still broken, make a thread in the forum support section so I can show it to Joker.