• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 37
    • Topics 2733
    • Posts 13008
    • Best 850
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      @flozen:

      Although I was initially disinclined to post here, I have an observation that spans several threads dealing with gender and social justice.

      And it is this:

      No point of debate, no personal anecdote, and no attempt at critical thought or persuasion is strengthened by calling a woman a "cunt."

      WOW, you are so far left that you are defending this "woman", who claimed that false rape claims are good for men.    Clearly, it's people like you that are the problem, when it comes to leftist lunacy.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Representative John Lewis does not consider Trump to be a legitimate president..

      This is part of the argument I had with RoyalCrown89, which in turn got me labeled a racist.

      You are NEVER allowed to be critical of John Lewis because of his civil rights work 50 years ago.    That means that we have to completely ignore his 35 years as a Congressman.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Gun Control Laws…

      I'm a "gun nut" and belong to a shooting club here in the UK.    In the US I owned guns.  I fully support the 2nd Amendment.

      All that said, everyone knows (should know) that I'm pissed about the that the insanity loophole hasn't been fixed even after The Long Island Railroad shooting.    Colin Ferguson was legally declared a nutter in New York state, but he was able to go to Virgina to get his guns.

      During Clinton, we had some sensible gun control laws that got fucked up because they were too specific to certain guns, rather than the types of guns they were banning.    As an example, they banned the TEC-9 and for extremely good reasons.  The problem was, the maker stopped making the now banned TEC-9 and started making the TEC-10 which was perfectly legal, even though it was virtually identical.    Instead of banning ALL guns that could easily be converted into SMGs, they only banned a few specific guns and not the type of gun.

      No one has a legit reason to personally own an SMG (as well as many other types).    I'm in favor of well-regulated gun clubs owning them, or as in the UK, you can personally own a gun, but it must be kept at a gun club.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      Thanks to recently laws in California, you will now get twice as much punishment for misgendering a person in a nursing home (1 year in jail and/or $1,000 fine) than you will get for intentionally spreading HIV to people without their consent/knowledge (6 months in jail).

      Is there still anyone claiming these are "outliers"?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      I was falsely accused of raping a woman because she was pissed that my husband and I (especially me) didn't want to take her out "gay clubbing".    I had to spend nearly 24 hour in jail and was only released once the cops watched the CCTV showing I never went near the women's bathroom where she claimed the rape took place.

      Nothing happened to her by the police for what she did and no lawyer wanted to touch a private/civil case against her because I would look "vindictive".

      I forget the cunt feminist's name, but she said that false rape claims against men are a good learning tool for men.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      In NYC, Canada and others, the "extreme left" as you like to portray them, are in charge.  They got shit put into law, that as you showed, isn't needed.  That still doesn't negate the very real fact that the leftist agenda is being put into law.

      "Don't worry, they won't enforce it" is kinda funny because the left gets extremely butt hurt that blacks still can't vote in some states in the US, under state law.  Gay sex (but not lesbo sex) is still illegal in Texas and 9 other states, despite the USSC ruling.    So why the butt hurt over these things, if they don't matter.    Adultery is illegal in 14 states, don't worry though, not many people get arrested for it.  Sex toys are illegal in at least 9 states (can't confirm the other 2), but don't worry, people rarely go to jail for it.

      Imagine is the right made all abortion illegal, but said "don't worry, we won't enforce it".

      In many western countries, the political parties frequently only allow people with certain traits (usually women, but quite often race and/or religion) to run.  As we saw in Canada, women got 50% of the cabinet jobs just because they had vaginas.  Trudeau even said a vag is more important than qualifications when choosing people to be given cabinet positions.

      Across the US, we are seeing leftists running amuck.  Evergreen is not an exception.  It may be extreme in some of their actions, but they. like college students everywhere, control the college.    Look at the violent protests on college campuses to prevent Milo, Ben Shapiro, and anyone else on the right from speaking.

      Colleges across the west had trigger warnings, about nearly everything.  The University of Chicago was the first to ban trigger warnings, after having them for a few years.

      The left has shit on real trans people with their bullshit.    As an example, there was a trans girl (formerly boy) in the same high school as Elliot Cope.  The real trans person had no problems at school.  Once Elliot Cope started her attention seeking shit, the real trans person started getting accused to being like Elliot Cope.

      Blaire White and Skylar (and real trans like them) are now criminalized because of the left's bullshit.  Bringing this fact up is deemed "transphobia".  Of course it's not transphobia, because I'm defending real trans people.

      Even with the leftist bias in "real news", we are seeing this shit.  That means that the problem is real and not just outliers as you claim.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      You keep saying that I'm using extremes, but I'm not.

      In Canada, NYC and others, it's illegal to mis"gender" someone.    While you won't go directly to prison for it, you will be given extreme fees (in NYC $125,000 for accidental misgendering and $250,000 for wilful misgendering; each time).  If you don't pay the fine, you will go to jail for contempt of court.    This is how SJWs justify the law saying it doesn't "criminalize" speech.

      Imagine the nightmare of the gender trenders like Elliot Cope, Milo Stewart, Dakota and the rest.    They could destroy people's lives and businesses under this law.

      As I said elsewhere recently, imagine if a bunch of white students went around a college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient non white students.    Do you think any of them would be arrested?  You know they would be.    Not surprisingly, "oppressed" black students and their cucks, at Evergreen College,  did exactly that and not a single arrest was made.  Hostage taking is a felony.  Not a single person in those videos was arrest for hostage taking, despite even the people involved reluctantly admitted it was hostage taking.

      What you call "extreme" is actually the norm.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: RaphJD will love this post.. mathematics is racist!

      Are we surprised?!  NOPE!!!

      Feminists said that science needs to be done through feminism or it's sexist and racist.

      There's that video of the black South African girl at the college debate saying that science is racist because it doesn't include things black Africans know are fact, like magic.

      It appears that Pluto is no longer a planet due to the feminist movement in science.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: If You Found George W. Bush’s Speech Offensive, You’re The Problem, Not Him

      Ok, so you believe that routine, scheduled mothballing of ships is somehow an emergency.    Obama said he would only use NO BID contracts in an emergency.    Not even GWB used no bid contracts for that.

      You are trying to make it acceptable for politicians to lie to us.

      If Obama had the moral high ground, then why hide what he was doing?  Snowden would be a non issue if Obama kept his promise to be the most transparent President ever.    Again, Obama lied his ass off.

      I've pointed out Obama's history with LGBTs equality and his political career.  He was willing to throw LGBTs under the bus to get the next political office.    Hell, he took credit for LGBT equality in Illinois that he had nothing to do with.  Sure, he did some good for LGBTs in Illinois, but only a little.  He did nothing like he loves to claim.  He claims things that happened before he first got elected.  He claims things other people did.

      If you notice, I'm only blaming Obama for Obama.  I'm not pinning the global economic meltdown on him, and stuff like that.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      Come on, let's stop deluding ourselves.

      We all know that ALL LIVES MATTER is deemed to be extremely racist by modern liberals.  When modern liberals hear that, their brain tells them we said KILL ALL N*GGERS.

      As already pointed out, WHITE LIVES MATTER despite being the most accurate when it comes to police shootings, when compared to crime figures, would be deemed extremely racist.    Nothing can ever be "white".

      You can't have Miss White America, but you can have Miss every other race America.  I was told that the reason we can't have Miss White America is because we already have Miss America.  When I explained that the same applies to other races, I was called a racist.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      The problem is, if you show that BLM is a bunch of shit, you are a racist.  It's like disagreeing with feminism makes you a sexist.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      BLM's entire narrative and "facts" are proven bunches of shit.

      The FBI and Justice Depart stats prove it's nothing but shit, but like feminism, fuck the truth.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      I know rape has been redefined.  Everything is now rape.

      Rape is still a very gendered thing, especially on college campuses.  A girl merely needs to have been within 5 miles of booze and she's deemed unable to have been able to give consent.  A guy gets passed out drunk and he can somehow rape a girl, even though she bragged about it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      Ok, so 1 leftist so far is too cowardly to defend his fellow leftists.

      Are there any leftists with the balls to defend the bullshit from their side?

      We know that RoyalCrown89 has defended free speech from his fellow leftist.  That is refreshing to see.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Opression - SJWs vs reality

      Oppression is very, very real.

      Let's look at how the SJWs view it vs what it's actually like.

      SJWs changed the definition of various words like "racism" to include things like "power" and other things to claim that only whites can be racist, that only men can be sexist, yada, yada, yada.

      As we saw with Berkeley over the last few years, blacks have had the power of the US Justice Depart., the state of California, the city of Berkeley and the police when pulling their racist shit against whites.    In their "white people go around" action, the police were there to prevent uppity crackers from trying to force their way across the bride rather than forced to walk through the creek, as the non white (mostly blacks) demanded they do.  If white people tried this shit, they would have been arrested and declared "racists".

      Evergreen College had what would be deemed "racist" incidents if whites had done the same thing, but leftist justify the actions since blacks and their cucks were doing it.  Imagine if a band of whites and their self hating black cucks roved around the college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient blacks.  Imagine if whites held a day where blacks were banned from the campus.  Imagine if white students held the black college president hostage and refused to let him go to the bathroom and told him to piss himself.

      BLM can block highways and refuse to let ambulances through, killing at least 1 child that we know about.  The chant about killing cops.  Their entire mantra is based in blatant lies.  This gets them invited with honors to the White House by Obama.

      Imagine if a gang of 4 whites kidnapped, with pre planning, a mentally disabled black young man and live streamed it for several hours making racist comments.  Do we think that white CNN hosts and their guests would screech "IT AINT NO HATE CRIME!!!".    Do you honestly believe that "real news" would totally ignore the story for at least 2 days hoping it would go away?!

      Imagine if a gang of whites filmed themselves dragging an elderly black guy out of his car and beating the shit out of him and stealing his car.  Do you think any "real news" outlet would be saying "Aw, poor, poor black people,  BOO HOO".  Like above, do you think "real news" would totally ignore this story until it got too big to ignore any longer?

      If a white guy shoots up a black church, we never hear the end of it.  A black guy shoots up a white church and "real news" ignores the story.

      If non whites are getting death threats by supposed "alt-right" supporter(s), the "real news" jumps on the story immediately to demonize all whites, but especially all white men.  Once it's proven that it's a false flag by a black guy, "real news" drops the story like it never existed.

      A black church being hate graffitied is immediately reported by "real news" who then go on screeching about how evil all whites, but especially all white men are.  Once it's proven that a black guy is the asshole doing the false flag, "real news" pretends like the story never existed.

      Imagine 4 white girls getting on a bus, starting shit with everyone else already on the bus.  The white girls scream that they were the innocent victims and targeted simply because they are white.    Imagine that "real news" jumps on the story with nothing more than the cries of victimhood.  Now imagine that once the CCTV videos are released the white girls are proven to be the aggressors, not the victim and the "real news" completely drops the story without correcting the story.

      Imagine some white Christian had hate graffittied on her car.  The "real media" jump on the story and scream "bigotry".  Now imagine that CCTV from the store nearby proved she did it herself.  The "real news" immediately drop the story, letting the false narrative remain.

      Leftists screech "JUST BELIEVE" despite the fact that countless stories have been proven to be fake.

      We're told that NO ONE, but especially women (quite sexist, if you ask me), lie about being raped.  The same goes with being victims of any other type of "victimhood" crime.    Lacy Green infamously was shown to have raped 4 million people, including myself.    We've had countless fake hate crimes, including "homophobic" ones.  Even after the Tawana Brawley case back in the 1980s (claimed she was gang raped by white cops, who then wrote "nigger" on her chest in dog shit), people are still demanding that we "just believe".  Even after Duke Lacrosse, mattress girl, Jackie at UVA, and countless others, we are still supposed to "just believe" if they are in a "victim" group.

      If a white person is the victim, even with mountains of proof, we're supposed to ignore it, especially if the victimizer is of a group that is always deemed as victims.  Leftists demand that we ignore it because it makes the "real" victims look bad.

      Women groping men, is empowering women, but those same women are just acting out their victimhood and oppression.

      Feminists, while screeching about gender equality, love to brag how perfect women are.  They love to show that not a single women in India has ever commit any form of domestic violence.  What they will refuse to tell you is that under India's laws, women CAN NOT commit any form of domestic violence.

      Similar things with sex crimes, especially rape.  In the UK for example, to commit the most serious types of sex crimes, you must have a penis, even if the penis isn't used in the act.    Shove a broom handle up someone's ass against their will, it's only rape if you are male.  It's sexual assault for you are female.  The same with most other types of sex crimes.  In India, women CAN NOT commit any form of sex crime.  Israel and several other countries are similar.

      Feminists have fought in the UK and around the world to maintain their privileges, while screeching like lunatics on how oppressed they are.

      Males are toxic.  Everything about being male is evil.    Nothing about being female is deemed toxic.  Everything "toxic" a female might do is solely due to toxic males.    Women are the main killers of their kids, blame men.  Mary Kay Letourneau fucked a 10yo boy and only spent 3 months in jail.  Blame males, even though it was a female judge.  MKL got out of jail and continued fucking the child.  She went back to jail for another 3 years.  AGAIN, blame penis.    MKL, by virtue of having a gash, makes her the victim not the criminal.

      In Portland, during a "protest" to stop people getting to work, a woman punched a man in the face.  He punched back and suddenly she's  a protected class because she has a vag.    She and her cucks demand that the man who hit her back be arrested because she has a vag and you never hit a woman.    The kick in the cunt, in all this, is the bitch does feminism videos talking about how women are equal to men.

      These cunts continued the "protest" when people were coming home from work, shutting down the city, preventing people from getting home.  These fuckers, while claiming to have the moral high group (and covering their faces, as always) thought they had the right to oppress people who had jobs from getting to and from work.

      ++++

      If the leftist on this site do respond, we will get to see some of the total fucking insanity of the left to justify this crap.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Sexual Consent in the Gay Community – have you been...?

      http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/scottish-barmen-banned-wearing-kilts-drunk-women-keep-groping-their-penises-1510817

      You'll find countless articles like this on the internet.

      You will also find countless articles, by feminists, declaring it's ok for women to do this because it's empowering women.  These cunts will justify the double standards with all manner of mental gymnastics.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: If You Found George W. Bush’s Speech Offensive, You’re The Problem, Not Him

      @rapjjd, what kind of wiretaps are you talking about with Obama? He had authority via The Patriot Act, which the American people allowed to pass unless you're talking about something else.

      YES, those.  As well as the other bits included in the Patriot Act and done by executive order.

      Obama campaigned to end all that shit, if elected President.  Obama expanded those program far beyond anything GWB had.

      Obama campaigned against No Bid contracts, except in dire emergency.  I totally agreed with him.    Turns out that was a fucking lie.  He used them for things like routine and scheduled mothballing of ships.    GWB used them for oil fires in Iraq, despite Schlumberger being the best company to do oil fires, giving the contracts to Halliburton.

      The people from what I remember were against most parts of the Patriot Act, as were Obama and Clinton.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Order yours before they run out!

      YouTube just totally removed all the channels of a guy that does historical military combat reviews, claiming the videos are terrorist training videos.

      When was the last time a terrorist dressed up as a 14th century German knight wielding a "skull splitter"?!  Maybe you've seen a terrorist dressed up as one of Gingus Khan's elite horsemen.

      Let's not forget his video showing the construction of a Samurai warrior's suit of armour.

      He went to japan to do a video on how PROPER/real Samurai swords are made.

      YES, all terrorist training videos.

      Of course muslims throwing gays off of rooftops and beheading their enemies and preaching jihad and "death to the west" and shit like that are ok to post to YouTube.  Well, those videos are ok as long as it's "pro islam" and not being critical of their actions.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Isn't PROTESTING a VIOLATION of FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

      I will never change my opinion on this.

      A peaceful protest/counter protest is nothing bad.

      Illegal types of protests are the problem.    NO ONE has the right to use violence/destruction or physical means to prevent others from using their free speech.

      Personally, I think the mayor of Berkeley should be hanged, drawn and quartered in the public square and have his head stuck on a pike for the treasonous acts he has committed against the US Constitution.    He sworn an oath to protect and defend the laws of the land and the constitution, but over the last few years he has clearly violated many of them.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Sexual Consent in the Gay Community – have you been...?

      When I was younger and still went clubbing, I used to get groped by both genders.

      Not surprisingly, women were far, far the worst.    I think this is because women are constantly told they are always the victim and nothing they do can be seen as bad since they are always the victims.

      How many millions of videos, articles and whatnot do we have telling us the women can NOT be sexist (blacks can't be racist, etc) based on nothing more than their genetics.

      I never liked being grabbed, but I would never, ever consider it "rape".

      Hell, there's that video from a couple years ago where some cuck was interviewing some feminist (both sitting on semi facing sofas).  The feminist claimed it was "rape" to speak to a woman without her permission.    Besides the obvious about words being "rape", they never explained how you can get a woman's permission in the first place without raping her by asking her if you can speak to her.

      The "Dear Colleagues" letter from the Obama administration to colleges changed the rules and definitions of what rape was, to include anything and everything.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 470
    • 471
    • 472
    • 473
    • 474
    • 650
    • 651
    • 472 / 651