Posts made by raphjd

Over the last few years, Reddit has routinely changed its rules to suit the liberal agenda.

Now Reddit is not allowing showing non-whites (not sure if this includes women) as the criminal aggressor, such as Boulder mass shooting by a Syrian.

Once again, the left is trying to hide the truth, so they can spew their anti-white narrative.

It's like how feminists claim that women are always innocent victims, never the bad guy, because in counties like the UK, Israel, India and many others, women can legally not commit certain crimes. As an example, you can "legally" say that women have never, ever committed domestic violence in Israel, India and other countries. Or that no woman in the UK has ever committed rape or other severe sex crimes.

I can't talk about the comparison/similarities between Dylann Roof and Emanuel Samson. I can't say that Emanuel Samson shot up a white church in a racist attack.

@hubrys

Federal courts are not the same as federal laws.

Marriage equality advocates were pushing for states' rights, and part of that was to overturn DOMA and restore FF&C when it comes to marriage.

This became important when Mass. legally recognized marriage equality in 2004.

Unlike abortion, now, there was no push at the time to make marriage equality a federal law. It was states' rights based on Massachusetts.

@hubrys

AH, I get it now.

You only want to focus on a tiny part of the marriage equality push.

You want us to ignore everything that doesn't gel with your narrative.

You aren't deluded, just dishonest.

@hubrys

If he was basing his comments on my "proven" track record, then he's just deluded as I have posted anti-voter fraud stuff prior to 2015 when Trump came down the escalator.

Ah, but you are innocent despite calling me an asshole and misrepresenting my stance.

You're no better than anyone else, despite you believing liberals are wonderful and perfect.

@hubrys

Ah, because you framed the original post as being in high school libraries, we can't talk about the full context of the argument.

And liberals pretend they aren't control freaks.

@hubrys

There was no push to make marriage equality as a federal law because Clinton and the DNC-controlled Congress were homophobes.

If Clinton and Congress were friendly to marriage equality, there would have been a push for it on the federal level.

This is why the abortion argument is not about the states, but about federal law. Biden and the DNC-controlled Congress love abortion.

I don't know if you are deluded or just being dishonest.

@hubrys

Ah, liberals and their cancel culture are wonderful, but when conservatives do it, it's evil.

Why are you so blinded?

Why do you have to defend putting a graphically detailed teen porn book in an elementary school? There are plenty of non-porn books you can defend.

Why do teachers NEED to have secret conversations with young students, like some sicko groomer?

I never knew my teachers' political leanings, so why must kids today be indoctrinated into their teachers' dogma?

LGBTs are not being erased.

I think you are confusing "my 2yo is trans" with "kids at that age don't even think like that".

@hubrys

He always dismissed EVERY post made about actual, proven voter fraud.

He also accused me of only ever caring about voter fraud because Trump lost, despite my long history here (and everywhere else) of being against voter fraud, even long before Trump ran for office.

He would take a topic that had never been discussed here and assume my stance, and use that to slag me off. At least I based my comments on his proven track record on actual discussions here.

I know, you're a liberal, so you can't see the difference.

@hubrys

If you want to think you did.

The only thing you "won" was not admitting that you people flip-flop on states' rights and federal rights, as the situation suits you.

Marriage and abortion are not enumerated to the federal government, so marriage is a states' rights issue, but abortion is a federal issue.

LOL, yeah you "won", alright.

@hubrys

But it is and was relevant that the graphically detailed teen porn book was not just provided to high schoolers. It was provided to K-12.

Your CNN article failed, intentionally, to mention the full argument, so I had to add the context.

As always with the left, you fail to frame things in their full context, so you don't look so bad.

As I said in the last post on the 1st page of this thread (to someone else), if the book was obscene enough to threaten a mother simply for reading the book out loud at a school board meeting, then it was too obscene for kids to read.

@hubrys

Nope.

You won't admit that if the DNC under Bill Clinton wasn't so hostile to gay equality, you would have gone the federal law route to make it the law of the land.

It's the same thing we see with abortion.

@hubrys

NOPE.

It was the tone and language you used, in that forum section.

If you would have used the same language and tone in the Politics/Debate section, it would have been no harm, no foul.

You have a biased view of the 2 recent temp bans, because they are on your side.

The 1st temp ban was due to the person refusing to debate the actual topic and instead kept reposting the same old crap that I should be banned for not being a liberal.

The 2nd temp ban was because the person routinely assumed my position on topics, in many cases he was completely wrong, using that to slag me off even when I had not posted in the topic. His extreme TDS and hatred of anyone who supported Trump is what got him banned.

@hubrys

If the Democrats weren't so hostile to gay equality, the people fighting for marriage equality would have fought for a federal law making it the law of the US.

This is what we are seeing in the abortion argument.

Because you have Congress and the WH on your side, you want a federal law, despite abortion not being enumerated, therefore a states' rights issue.

@hubrys

You must be desperate to defend providing graphically detailed teen porn to K-5 kids.

@hubrys

Name-calling, nice.

DOMA, as enacted by your beloved Democrats, did in fact erase FF&C when it came to marriage equality, until SCOTUS overturned it, more than a decade later.

DOMA allowed the federal government and other states to reject gay marriages.

While statutes can not technically "erase" parts of the constitution, they can effectively erase them until the SCOTUS overturns the statute, as they did in DOMA and DADT. This almost always take more than a decade.

Abortion is not enumerated, but the left wants a federal law to make it legal. Of course, you can't see the similarities because you are blinded by your agenda and hatred of anyone who disagrees.

@hubrys

It does not matter.

They provided a graphic detailed teen porn book to elementary (K-5) school kids.

So, grooming isn't bad, if it doesn't end up in actual sex acts, according to your logic.

@hubrys

DOMA erased the Full Faith and Credit Clause, but only for marriage equality and by extension all gay equality.

The argument was, if states enact marriage equality or civil partnerships, then it must be accepted by everyone else (other states and the federal government) under FF&C.

It was a states' rights argument in that each state was allowed to decide who could get married and due to the FF&C everyone else had to accept it.

It was not a federal government issue.

@hubrys

I do love your BS.

Go look for it. I believe it was in the Gay News section, maybe General News.

So, if I feel you didn't respond to my comments in a way I don't like, I get to treat you the same way?

Graphic, detailed discussions of teens having sex, is child porn. Imagine what would happen to this site if we had the movie version of that book and it had the exact detailed sex scenes.

@hubrys

Where were you during this time, that you don't know about this?

When individual states where starting to give marriage equality and civil unions to us, the right argued that it was not legal under federal law, but the left argued that it was states' rights.

Let me guess, you think that the marriage equality movement started during Obama.

@hubrys

Actually, I did admit I was wrong, on that single photograph. Also, you act as if I photoshopped it.

You called me an asshole and liar about that teen porn book being in Florida school libraries. Remember that?

Once I found the name of the elementary school that had it in their library, you ran away from the thread. So, using your rules, you are the asshole and liar since you have yet to admit that teen porn book was available in school libraries from K-12.