You are a fool. although the last two letters of this site are .RU.. this site has zero to do with Russia. Just ask Czar Joker, and comrades Riddler, Mazda, Pawpcorn, and Raphjd
Yeah, mmmhmm. It's a website with a Russian address where the most vociferous posters happen to be very defensive of Russia. Could not possibly have a connection there.
Ok Loki, if you wanna be TECHNICAL, no it isn't illegal for anyone in government to have a server at their home that is separate from their government server at work. But when you put CLASSIFIED government information on your PRIVATE home server, then it IS a Federal Crime. And most certainly it is ILLEGAL to EMAIL CLASSIFIED government documents. If you talk to the IRS they will give you a fax number that will only be good for about 30 minutes, and will not accept emailed documents or forms, because "EMAIL IS NOT SECURE." Everyone in government knows this, from the TOP to the lowly IRS employee you are just trying to deliver your forms to.
Of course she didn't email anything classified. A small (as in three) number of emails were emailed to her and were mislabeled. And then the FBI decided that some stuff should, retroactively, have been labeled classified, which happens all the time. Most departments in the government disagree about what counts as classified. By the by, the diplomatic cables can (and have) been hacked.
By the by here's a small list of people who have done exactly what Clinton did with her email: Colin Powell, John Karry, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Rick Perry, Scott Walker, Martin O'Malley, Greg Abbot, Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin, Ashton Carter, Karl Rove… oh and Mike Pence.
Let's also not forget about the millions of emails the Bush administration deleted.
I was going to take the time to reply to Loki100, but he is so full of shit that he doesn't deserve a response.
Or, rather, the right-wing conspiracy sites you get your talking points from haven't given you the correct responses. Speaking of which, still calling the whole "Trump disclosed classified Israeli intelligence to Russia" fake news?
Here's the facts:
Hillary ILLEGALLY kept a server in her house containing hundreds of thousands of digital documents (which is a Federal Crime).
Nope. It wasn't a crime to have a private server (which, by the by, the government doesn't differentiate from a private email address) in the first place. In fact, the number of people who have private email addresses in government is… more or less everyone of note. Including most people in the current administration. Nor was any
These documents included those from her tenure as Secretary of State during the 2008-2012 tenure of Osama (and Benghazi).
Her house was not a secure location, nor was it safe from cyber attacks, nor did she have permission to do that.
The people Hillary hired to set up her server and maintain it.. and access it, and DELETE things had NO security clearance.
Congress ORDERED Hillary to turn over 30,000 e-mails from that server.
AFTER being ORDERED to turn over the e-mails, Hillary hired a private company with no security clearance to destroy the evidence.
Those actions amount to treason, obstruction of justice, lying to Congress, and other crimes - all of which should have her in prison.
Of course none of that ever happened. What actually happened was that she went over all the emails and turned over all the ones that were work related and deleted all the ones that were personal. And she turned over lots of stuff she didn't have to, as anyone who read the emails knows, hence why there are emails asking about the times of TV shows or sending birthday greetings. And, additionally, her emails would be archived by the people she sent them to.
Again, none of this is a crime, and no one before Comey made his announcement (except far right-wing conspiracy sites) thought she was going to be indicted, let alone tried and found guilt.
Trump wanted those e-mails recovered, to show that Hillary is a crook.
A crook who has managed to keep all evidence of her crookedness hidden for decades now. I would like to ask how many investigations into Hillary Clinton that turn up nothing will have to take place before you admit there was nothing there in the first place?
Hillary then took the extra step of not only deleting those e-mails but made sure they could not be recovered by using "bleach bit" software.
Who had the "Bleach bit!" square on the Bingo board?
Eventually, the dozen or more agencies investigating the e-mails determined that Hillary's rogue server in her house had been hacked by at LEAST 5 different countries and other parties not tied to a government.
Nope. Actually the State department's servers got hacked. There was zero evidence that any of Clinton's private equipment got hacked (hence why Russia didn't release the emails Trump asked for). If anything her equipment was more secure than the government's.
Duplicates of many of those e-mails were found on the computer of pedophile Anthony Weiner who is the husband of Huma Abedin (who is Hillary's top aide and rumored lesbian lover).
They were client side copies.
WikiLeaks began publishing batches of these e-mails which were extremely damaging to Hillary.
They weren't in and of themselves. There was nothing remotely damaging in them. All the damage was done because the media kept reporting on emails even though there wasn't a story there. The Hillary Clinton email saga was actually three different things, none of which actually amounted to a real scandal. So for a year and a half all the public heard was "Hillary Clinton something something something emails." And that was the damage.
She wisely didn't even attempt to refute these e-mails, but started waving the "Red Flag" and claiming that Russia was trying to destroy her.
Several times, the head of WikiLeaks stated that the source of the e-mails was NOT a state run agency, NOT Russia.. and Assange has a reputation for never lying.
Of course he does. He has a reputation for being a pathological liar. He will say or do anything for attention. Anywho, the hacking has been confirmed by anyone who looked at the evidence to be obviously Russia's handiwork.
Look at the last two letters of the web address. Obviously it will be filled with Alt-Right a-holes who very much want people not to be concerned with Russia.
Do you smoke crack, sniff glue, or both?
I have tried to think of some way to engage your asinine, false comments, but there is no meat on the bone to chew on.
I'm curious if now that everyone, literally everyone, has confirmed the story of Trump giving Israeli intelligence to Russia, if you are still going to stick by your claim that it is "fake news?"
NOPE.
Feminists say we shouldn't have trials or investigations.
[CITATION NEEDED]
(I'm guessing this is going to go to an anonymous tumblr post)
You are clearly delusional.
The last 2 labour governments REFUSED to give us marriage equality.
I'm not the one who kept denying which party voted for it and which party voted against it.
So you are still refusing to admit that it was David Cameron's Tory/conservative government that put the bill forward.
Unlike Labour's whipped vote, the Tories were allowed to vote as they saw fit.
And they voted against it. Thank you for admitting that Labor gave the UK marriage equality and that the Conservatives opposed them.
OMG it Doesn't MATTER if there was an investigation! The whole damn world was investigating it! The fact is that there was ZERO EVIDENCE! GOD DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do I need to take this further?????
You're very first statement: "Comey cleared Trump 3 times stating that he NEVER impeaded an investigation. BECAUSE THERE WASN'T ONE. PERIOD."
We're you lying when you said that?
You are a GODdamn LIAR. Comey admitted it, Maxine Waters did to already. Get over it. There is nothing to support your claims other than the claim ITSELF. If I'm wrong, then go ahead and give me ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE. Go AHEAD, and give me one OFFICIAL STATEMENT that backs up what you merely WANT TO BELIEVE. There is NOTHING. NOTHING. NOTHING. AND MORE FUCKING NO-THING. You have ZERO PROOF, and nothing to back up what you're saying, just a bunch of wanna believe it crap.
So, now I think I am getting somewhere. See, what you seem to be referring to is a quote from Trump, NOT from Comey, "While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation." So you lied about that, fun times.
As far as evidence, here's the letter from the office of the deputy Attorney General:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726372-Order-3915-2017-Special-Counsel.html
1. It confirms there is an investigation.
2. It confirms there was an investigation under Comey.