Posts made by jaroonn

https://eu.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/trump/2024/05/27/trump-memorial-day-missive-includes-human-scum-in-ny-legal-proceedings/73868637007/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/eric-trump-slammed-particularly-disgusting-043230168.html

To be expected from Pvt. Bone Spurs and his brain dead spawn.

@raphjd I mentioned those three judges because there is evidence they are, in fact, dirty. I don't think every conservative judge is dirty. I have no problem with the others on the Supreme Court. I may not agree with their rulings, but I don't think they are dirty in the way that Alito and Thomas are.

The conflict of interest you mention is the fact that those judges supported Democratic candidates, I am assuming. So would it be better if we selected judges who supported the GOP to preside? Would that have been more fair? Or should we require judges to be absolutely neutral politically? Good luck with that. The judicial system is not perfect, for sure. But it only does the country an extreme disservice when either side calls it into question haphazardly.

I do believe that there are outside forces working to tear down Western democracies by many means, one of which to create distrust in our fundamental institutions. And as we can see, they are succeeding. They are also spreading hate and misinformation, so that we can no longer have civil conservations and learn to compromise. And as we can see from this board, game, set, match for them.

@raphjd Good for you. I didn't say I disagreed with your post, only your personal attack on me. You misquoted me. That was the issue I was addressing.

@raphjd And only judges who rule against conservatives are dirty in your tiny little right-wing mind.

@raphjd Why are you willfully misquoting me? I never said there were no dirty judges. If fact, I mentioned Cannon, Alito and Thomas as examples of very dirty judges.

@raphjd Indeed.

@raphjd said in Liberals three times more biased than conservatives when evaluating ideologically opposite individuals, study finds:

I also do not believe

I can't think of anything more inconsequential.

@raphjd The former yes, the latter no. I know how much you hate all Muslims (because you are so unbiased), so am just going to let that lie.

I also know how important having the last word feeds into your delusions of having won an argument (and when you feel yourself slipping you throw in some unrelated topic such as Palestinian "shit"), so I will just give you this one. It's too absurd to be arsed about.

@raphjd said in Liberals three times more biased than conservatives when evaluating ideologically opposite individuals, study finds:

No one believes you.

Speaking for the world now, are we? It might be a frontal lobe issue. I might recommend an EEG.

You can try to insult my intelligence as much as you like. Just remember that you profess that every academic in the world is aware of every field, opinion, theory, etc. out there. As I've told you repeatedly: sexual deviation is not a hobby of mine. I'm not well-versed on the topic.

@raphjd I could debate you about the existence of a collective brain, but I see no point; you really are that thick. Not sure if I should feel more sorry for you or the people around you.

@raphjd said in Liberals three times more biased than conservatives when evaluating ideologically opposite individuals, study finds:

We are well versed in your profession's push to promote child fucking because we are against it.
Prior to 25 years ago when your profession started pushing MAP, you losers pushed plain old child fucking. You didn't try to hide your agenda.
I still say you are a liar or the dumbest fucktard on the planet that you had no clue about what your profession has been doing all these years.

I'm just going to let that statement stand as is. Everything that you are is summed up there perfectly. Like I've said before, sometimes I am not sure if you are just playing Devil's advocate, or really are that thick. And so much for your "unbiased" BS. What a clown.

@raphjd said in Liberals three times more biased than conservatives when evaluating ideologically opposite individuals, study finds:

He's the most clueless person I've ever met. Everyone else knows things going on within their own profession.

I would say you are the most clueless person you've ever met if you expect and English Linguistics professor to know about such things. Doesn't come up much in discussion of syntax and semantics.

Like I've said, you and blabarg are the only two people I've ever talk to who are so well-versed in the subject of pedophilia.

@raphjd LOL...a legend in your own mind. Nice.

Have a good day

@raphjd If Hunter were an elected official....maybe. He certainly has had some bad behavior in the past. But, of course, given your excuses for Trump's whoring around, I guess that doesn't matter.

Joe Biden, however, seems to be squeaky clean based on the evidence. That's why Gym and Foghorn have to keep going on Fox promising bogus "breakthroughs."

It has been interesting to see what happens when the Right's lies actually make it to the legal system. Hasn't turned out so well, has it?

@raphjd Given that deflection, I will assume that you know exactly what I was talking about.

Perhaps, since you are part of the "less evil" group, I can expect better from you in the future?

@raphjd No, I'm talking about conservatives inventing terms like "dirty Merrick Garland" because Trump and co. are being indicted left and right while they have NOTHING on Biden. Even Hunter's laptop...nothing. So, when they have nothing that will stand up in court, they make nicknames and spread innuendo and lies or blame the "dirty" system. Because....they....have...nothing

https://apnews.com/article/drag-performer-defamation-blogger-idaho-c0f3188081e17843059b27d19d5be980

@raphjd Biases result in making sweeping generalizations about people; for example, when someone support Palestinian statehood and it then accused of supporting rape and anti-Semitism.

Ring a bell?

@raphjd Like Bill Barr. But again, I am talking about the current situation.

@raphjd said in Trump highlights Biden admin authorizing ‘deadly use of force’ in Mar-a-Lago raid:

Maybe you forgot how Eric Strok changed the report about Killary so that it said she didn't have a criminal mindset when she intentionally violated the Congressional subpoena.
Maybe you forgot that her lawyer, Sussman, had an all-access pass in the FBI building.

Which has no relevance to the current state of affairs to which I was referring.