• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. Frederick
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 654
    • Posts 2497
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Frederick

    • RE: TWO TOP DEMS ARRESTED TODAY - A SENATOR and PREZ of NYC YOUNG DEMS

      @mhorndisk:

      Democratic Senator Nathaniel Oaks of Maryland ARRESTED for FEDERAL WIRE FRAUD:

      https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/federal-charges-filed-against-maryland-state-senator-accepting-payments-exchange-official

      President of the Manhattan Young Democrats ARRESTED for CHILD PORN - some of the images were of young girls as old as 6 years old in sexual positions with an adult male. His father said he was already in therapy for this.

      http://therightscoop.com/top-ny-democrat-leader-arrested-for-child-porn/

      DRAIN THAT SWAMP!!!

      One reason that scumbag libtards and cops seek jobs in government is because people who work in government are largely protected and immune from being held liable for anything.  Two clear examples of that are "diplomatic immunity" and the fact that cops residences are not included in property tax records (but everyone else is).

      When people are safe from prosecution, they tend to commit more crimes.  This is why cops commit so many murders and abuses of power, because they know that the odds of them getting away with it are over 99%

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Rusik - TwinkMix #VideoREQUEST

      There are massive numbers of fantastic looking guys who only exist in photosets with no associated videos. 
      I don't know why.  Perhaps those photosets are actually used to advertise prostitution.

      Generally, it seems that adult performers only do ONE thing though.  They will either do photosets, escort, work clubs, porn movies, or webcamming.. but rarely a mixture of them.

      posted in Youngbloods & Twinks
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Kushner Discussed Setting Up Secret Communication Channel With Moscow

      @aadam101:

      Frederick, it sounds like you are starting to acknowledge that the Trumps did collude with Russia.  Even just the fact that he was going to do it shows just what a slimeballs this members of this family are.

      And yeah I know….I will save you the trouble of replying.

      Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary

      What is your obsession with Hillary?

      By the way, it fascinates me that I post a message which clearly explains that there was no collusion, and you blatantly misrepresent my message and say I'm acknowledging that the Trumps did collude with Russia.

      Don't ever do that again.  :fight:

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Russian banker Kushner met with considered 'Putin crony' by US intel

      @Drwas:

      The Russian banker Jared Kushner met with in December has been described by U.S. intelligence officials as a “Putin crony,” according to a report for NBC News.

      NBC News reports Sergey Gorkov graduated from FSB Academy, which officials describe as a “finishing school” for spies, in 1994.

      Officials say Gorkov often performed sensitive financial operations for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

      NBC News and the Washington Post reported this week that the president’s son in law is under scrutiny in the federal investigation into potential ties between the Trump campaign and Russian election meddling. This does not mean that Kushner is suspected of a crime.

      Investigators are looking into Kushner's meeting with Gorkov last December as well as a meeting with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

      Putin appointed Gorkov to run VneshEconomBank (VEB), which is a state-run bank that has worked against the effects of U.S. sanctions by finding other sources of foreign capitol.

      The White House and VEB confirmed told NBC News that Kushner and Gorkov met at a roadshow in December, but did not provide details on the location or the specific date.

      The news comes a day after The Washington Post reported that Kushner may have discussed creating a secret communications channel with the Trump transition team and the Kremlin.

      http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/335410-russian-banker-kushner-met-with-considered-putin-crony-by-us-intel

      Here we go again.. with your false stories and vivid imagination. 
      To begin with, you are calling Jared Kushner a Russian banker.
      1.  Jared Kushner is not Russian, he is American
      2.  Jared Kushner was never a banker, he was the CEO of a real estate development company.  (which he resigned from before the election)

      It is pitiful how far the libtards will go to try and smear and disrupt the president and damage the USA.  It's media terrorism.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Kushner Discussed Setting Up Secret Communication Channel With Moscow

      @aadam101:

      You are right.  They are not the same..  What Kushner did was much worse.  There was no ill intent in what Hillary did.

      Uh… methinks you are making an ass out of yourself.. again.

      Even if we assume that the story about Kushner is true, he didn't DO anything.  All it claims happened is that Kushner suggested an idea, that was not ever put into action.

      Are we now criminalizing suggestions?

      Here's something criminal.. Right before the election, Bill Clinton having a private conversation with the U.S. attorney general for half an hour just as the Attorney General is supposed to be deciding whether or not to file charges against his crooked wife "Slippery Hillary".

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Comey's SUPREME mistake FREES Trump!

      @mhorndisk:

      Youtube Video

      Comey exonerated Trump on May 3, stating he did not try to impede the investigation.  :afr: :crazy2: :cheers:

      Did you not get… THE MEMO???? LOL!!!!

      That's right, Comey said it, and if Trump did, than Comey had the obligation to report it, which HE DID NOT. So let it go already! It's just pathetic that you want to keep wasting our time and tax dollars, that's the reason Trump said, "I hope you can let this go." BECAUSE IT'S A TOTAL WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY AND IS TOTALLY FALSE!!! DUHHHHHRR!

      I wonder what new scandal the libtards will invent next week?  They will do anything to prevent Trump from passing healthcare, tax plan, wall funding, and keeping terrorists out.  There is a time limit in how long Congress is in session - which is running out.  (and then they have the gall to blame TRUMP for dissention!)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C

      @Dene:

      FYI: re: c section - its 1/3 not 1/2 but i get your point - if a baby can be saved in an incubator and mum is fine then this is the way to go

      It peaked at about 1/2, and is now declining to 1/3.  Frankly even 1/3 is WAY too high.  The reason for it is that americans tend to be very out of shape compared to other animals.  People who are "fit" don't have great difficulty with vag delivery.

      It's interesting that the woman "Roe" in "Roe vs Wade" changed her mind about abortion years after she won that case, and was AGAINST abortion til the day she died.  She realized that abortion should not be abused as a form of trivial birth control.  My dad's second wife desperately wanted to have a baby GIRL.  She finally managed to get pregnant, had a sonogram, and it was a BOY.  She didn't want a boy, so she had an abortion!  How creepy is that?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C

      @aadam101:

      I can't find any Clinton quotes.  I'm sure Frederick has plenty of them though right?

      You didn't look very hard then.  You can start with the youtube videos I provided.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Trump's Noose Tightens as Kushner, Sessions Deeper in Russia Probe

      @Drwas:

      Lock Him Up!

      You libtards never give up on your fantasies. 
      It's like Peter Pan telling children to "think happy thoughts and you can FLY!"
      only with libtards it's  "think hateful, seditious, paranoid, negative thoughts and Hillary can still be president!"

      Here's some news… Trump won.. and will win again in 2020.  The economy is doing great, he's gaining the respect of the rest of the world which was lost by Obama.

      Libtards need to go make themselves some hot cocoa with mini marshmallows and smoke a joint.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Any Trump Supporters here?

      @mhorndisk:

      Alex reported on Bilderberg for many years… now the MSM accepts it as an open secret.

      Stuff like that. You wanna pretend that he's fake because he calls out Hildabeast for deleting 33,000 emails before a subpoena using Bleach Bit, every day, which she actually did, and it doesn't suit your version of reality or more like "what you WANT to believe."

      I'm sure you can watch Colbert and get an impression, but everyone deserves their piece, and since you won't listen to his side of the story, BECAUSE you don't like him calling out your Goddess for her WHORE desecrations, you won't be having any of that, but it's ok. You are welcome to believe whatever you want, because it doesn't matter since that ship is sinking.

      Colbert is like a weathervane.  He pushes whatever buttons that give him the best ratings.  At the moment, he is the daily affirmation for libtards.  When you think about it, if Colbert omitted attacking Trump from his show, he wouldn't have a show.  Colbert has become a one-note hemorrhoid.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Is the opposite of RIGHT "Left" or "Wrong"?

      @Dene:

      @Frederick:

      Although I'm not a liberal, it is possible to be liberal and be credible (believe it or not!)
      However, these days, the problem isn't so much the liberals / democrats, it is the massive influx of libtards that just make things, up, twist them, and spew hateful, anti-Trump crap every day, ad nauseum!

      People can have differences of opinion and both sides have good points and credibility.. but that isn't happening.
      Truth, accuracy, and fairness have been cast aside by the libtards.  They will say and fabricate anything to try and undermine the government.

      I can concisely tell you what is going on:
      In wars, when one side has lost, sometimes instead of surrendering, they do what is called "scorched earth" and destroy their own country rather than allow the winners to take it.  This is exactly what the libtards are doing.  Even though they might SAY that they accept that Trump won, they do NOT accept it.  They do NOT want Trump to succeed at anything.  The libtards and snowflakes would rather see the country fail than allow Trump to fix it.

      Mate

      I am not sure the 1st 3 times I told you but I am telling you again.. left bash all you freaking want but PLEASE stop using the word libtard - it just makes you look like an ass

      What word do you use to delineate liberals and democrats who act and behave like whining, malcontent, crazy, lying, delusional babies?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: UK will no longer share intelligence with US because of NYT leaks.

      @mhorndisk:

      https://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2017/05/25/manchester-police-no-longer-sharing-intelligence-with-the-united-states-due-to-leaks-n2331610

      The New York Times keeps leaking information, that's why the UK has stated it will no longer share intelligence with the US. The NYT is not concerned about National Security, that's why they keep colluding with the leakers in the White House. Thanks NYT, for ruining our relationship with another nation just because you want to make money. Another example of the absolute disgrace known as the liberal media.

      One big change with newspapers is that compared to the past, very few people subscribe to newspapers anymore.  They resort to daily "gotchas" to make eye-catching headlines to sell their newspapers like supermarket tabloids.  The media in the USA have adopted the tactics of England's "Fleet Street".

      As for libtards.. their motto is "if you haven't got anything bad to say.. make it up!"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Is the opposite of RIGHT "Left" or "Wrong"?

      Although I'm not a liberal, it is possible to be liberal and be credible (believe it or not!)
      However, these days, the problem isn't so much the liberals / democrats, it is the massive influx of libtards that just make things, up, twist them, and spew hateful, anti-Trump crap every day, ad nauseum!

      People can have differences of opinion and both sides have good points and credibility.. but that isn't happening.
      Truth, accuracy, and fairness have been cast aside by the libtards.  They will say and fabricate anything to try and undermine the government.

      I can concisely tell you what is going on:
      In wars, when one side has lost, sometimes instead of surrendering, they do what is called "scorched earth" and destroy their own country rather than allow the winners to take it.  This is exactly what the libtards are doing.  Even though they might SAY that they accept that Trump won, they do NOT accept it.  They do NOT want Trump to succeed at anything.  The libtards and snowflakes would rather see the country fail than allow Trump to fix it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C

      @zerocoo666:

      Clinton never did. In fact, she's been open to partial-birth abortion bans before. Which is dumb as hell because they're extremely rare and always because the mother's life is at extreme risk.

      Bullshit on all counts.
      Hillary has consistently proudly and boldly defended the right of women to have guilt-free, taxpayer paid, abortions on demand, up until the very day of delivery.

      Third term abortions are NOT rare at all.  The number of abortions per year varies between 1 and 3 million.  That is 1 to 3 million too many. 
      Just how many 3rd term abortions do you consider to be "very rare"? 
      What IS extremely rare is when the mother's life is at risk during a pregnancy. 
      By the way.. what is considerably dangerous is having an abortion to begin with.  It's far riskier to have an abortion than to carry a baby full term.  When they go up that snatch with their scissors, knives, vacuums, scrapers, and chemicals.. all sorts of things can go wrong.

      Also.. 3rd term means  6 to 9 months.  Hospitals can now take 6 months old unborn babies, put them in an incubator, and they do just fine.  Assuming that the mother's life is at risk in the 3rd trimester, there is no reason why they could not do a cesarean and stick the baby in an incubator.  About half of hospital births are cesarean anyway.

      Youtube Video

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      @aadam101:

      @Frederick:

      I don't need to comment on this one.  Just click the link and read.

      Xhttp://freebeacon.com/politics/five-old-tweets-came-back-haunt-chuck-schumer/  (remove the X to view it)

      Trumps old tweets come back to haunt him all the time.  Even this week his euro trash hooker wife insulted Saudi Arabia by not wearing a head scarf.

      I don't like Chuck Schumer either  though.  I wish someone else was the face of the Democratic party.

      I can't think of anybody in Congress that I'm thrilled with, no matter what party.  Congressmen tend to be megalomaniac lawyers and hairbrained activists.  Most people are turned off by congressmen, which is why most presidents are former governors instead of congressmen. 
      What's the opposite of PRO-gress?  CON-ress.

      I do think that there should be term limits for congressmen.  Two 6 year terms or one 10 year term is plenty for any of them.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Is any thread here worth reading?

      @Loki100:

      Look at the last two letters of the web address. Obviously it will be filled with Alt-Right a-holes who very much want people not to be concerned with Russia.

      You are a fool.  although the last two letters of this site are .RU.. this site has zero to do with Russia.  Just ask Czar Joker, and comrades Riddler, Mazda, Pawpcorn, and Raphjd

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Getting back to reality with this Russian hacking witchhunt

      @Loki100:

      @Frederick:

      Here's the facts:
      Hillary ILLEGALLY kept a server in her house containing hundreds of thousands of digital documents (which is a Federal Crime).

      Nope. It wasn't a crime to have a private server (which, by the by, the government doesn't differentiate from a private email address) in the first place. In fact, the number of people who have private email addresses in government is… more or less everyone of note. Including most people in the current administration. Nor was any

      @Frederick:

      These documents included those from her tenure as Secretary of State during the 2008-2012 tenure of Osama (and Benghazi).
      Her house was not a secure location, nor was it safe from cyber attacks, nor did she have permission to do that.
      The people Hillary hired to set up her server and maintain it.. and access it, and DELETE things had NO security clearance.
      Congress ORDERED Hillary to turn over 30,000 e-mails from that server.
      AFTER being ORDERED to turn over the e-mails, Hillary hired a private company with no security clearance to destroy the evidence.
      Those actions amount to treason, obstruction of justice, lying to Congress, and other crimes - all of which should have her in prison.

      Of course none of that ever happened. What actually happened was that she went over all the emails and turned over all the ones that were work related and deleted all the ones that were personal. And she turned over lots of stuff she didn't have to, as anyone who read the emails knows, hence why there are emails asking about the times of TV shows or sending birthday greetings. And, additionally, her emails would be archived by the people she sent them to.

      Again, none of this is a crime, and no one before Comey made his announcement (except far right-wing conspiracy sites) thought she was going to be indicted, let alone tried and found guilt.

      @Frederick:

      Trump wanted those e-mails recovered, to show that Hillary is a crook.

      A crook who has managed to keep all evidence of her crookedness hidden for decades now. I would like to ask how many investigations into Hillary Clinton that turn up nothing will have to take place before you admit there was nothing there in the first place?

      @Frederick:

      Hillary then took the extra step of not only deleting those e-mails but made sure they could not be recovered by using "bleach bit" software.

      Who had the "Bleach bit!" square on the Bingo board?

      @Frederick:

      Eventually, the dozen or more agencies investigating the e-mails determined that Hillary's rogue server in her house had been hacked by at LEAST 5 different countries and other parties not tied to a government.

      Nope. Actually the State department's servers got hacked. There was zero evidence that any of Clinton's private equipment got hacked (hence why Russia didn't release the emails Trump asked for). If anything her equipment was more secure than the government's.

      @Frederick:

      Duplicates of many of those e-mails were found on the computer of pedophile Anthony Weiner who is the husband of Huma Abedin (who is Hillary's top aide and rumored lesbian lover).

      They were client side copies.

      @Frederick:

      WikiLeaks began publishing batches of these e-mails which were extremely damaging to Hillary.

      They weren't in and of themselves. There was nothing remotely damaging in them. All the damage was done because the media kept reporting on emails even though there wasn't a story there. The Hillary Clinton email saga was actually three different things, none of which actually amounted to a real scandal. So for a year and a half all the public heard was "Hillary Clinton something something something emails." And that was the damage.

      @Frederick:

      She wisely didn't even attempt to refute these e-mails, but started waving the "Red Flag" and claiming that Russia was trying to destroy her. 
      Several times, the head of WikiLeaks stated that the source of the e-mails was NOT a state run agency, NOT Russia.. and Assange has a reputation for never lying.

      Of course he does. He has a reputation for being a pathological liar. He will say or do anything for attention. Anywho, the hacking has been confirmed by anyone who looked at the evidence to be obviously Russia's handiwork.

      I was going to take the time to reply to Loki100, but he is so full of shit that he doesn't deserve a response.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Betsy Devos Says Discrimination Against LGBT Students Is OK

      @Drwas:

      Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos says she has no problem with states that allow schools to discriminate against LGBT students while receiving federal funds, and believes that the federal government should not intervene.

      Wednesday afternoon at the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Sevices, and Education, Democratic Rep. Katherine Clark of Massachusetts shared with Secretary DeVos the policies of an Indiana private school, the Lighthouse Christian Academy, which is allowed to accept state vouchers – a program for which DeVos has spent decades advocating.

      As Rep. Clark told DeVos, the school's handbook states it will refuse admission to or expel students when someone in the child's home is "living in, condoning sexual immorality; practicing homosexual lifestyle or alternate gender identity; promoting such practices."

      Rep. Clark, noting that the Lighthouse Academy receives over $665,000 in state vouchers, told DeVos the school policy is that "if you are from a family where there is homosexual or bisexual activity – their word not mine – or practicing alternate gender identity, you may be denied admissions."

      Betsy Devos is the FEDERAL Secretary of Education.  The $665,000 in state vouchers are issued by the STATE of Indiana.  Devos is not the one who can tell the state of Indiana how to spend their money.  If those were FEDERAL vouchers, that would be different.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: No Politician Has Been Treated Worse or More Unfairly

      @Oscarbingham:

      WRONG! Hillary has been.

      WRONG!  Hillary has not only been treated fairly, she's gotten a free pass for decades.  She should have been disqualified from running for anything, and put in JAIL.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C

      @aadam101:

      You are so sadly mistaken.  Most unwanted children end up in between A and B.  They up in and out of foster care their entire lives.  They get abused, the state takes them away, the parents (usually just the mother) cleans herself up, they get sent back, they get abused again and the process repeats itself over and over.  In the meantime she is still having more children and they are all going through this (and sometimes not at the same time).  Foster care has an extremely low adoption rate.  Most kids never end up on an adoption track.  It costs states $40k per year per child.  An abortion costs $600.

      I could get behind the anti abortion folks if they were willing to pony up the cash and fund that $40k per year.  They only care about fetuses.  They don't give a damn about actual children.

      Anybody who would even consider allowing a full term baby to have it's spinal cord severed hours before birth is beyond contempt.  Hillary Clinton is such a person.  I dare anybody to say that they defend the right to have such an abortion.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • 1
    • 2
    • 105
    • 106
    • 107
    • 108
    • 109
    • 124
    • 125
    • 107 / 125