Posts made by bluehue

his scent for sure. after a 'bout at the gym, i just want to get fucked by someone sweaty.

@Gr1zz:

@cigarboyrick:

Certainly cut and smooth - The tighter the cut and closer the shave the better
Nothing quite like a thick tightly cut cock!

As someone who has been cut way too tight, I would tend to disagree with this statement.

When a full erection causes tearing and pain, that's way too tightly cut.

I've seen several that have been botched worse, though, and it makes me glad for what I have.  I remember one fellow who pees out of the side of his shaft, about half-way down, and has hair most of the way up his shaft, because when he was cut, there was nothing else left but hairy crotch skin that got sewn on his dick.  He does shave, but still has sharp bristly stubble all over his penis two or three hours later.

I've also talked with some fellows who have been cut as adults, and the vast majority say that they would not do it again, if they had the chance to go back and change their mind.  Perhaps the comparison with having one's eyelids removed is a little extreme, but the necessity is similar.

The medical statistics say that there are "complications" in about 0.1% of the procedures.  That's one in a thousand.  And the nature of the complications can range from excessive bleeding (and for a newborn, it doesn't take that much blood loss to become serious, and can lead to death), to total amputation.  So if the doctor suggests that Billy become Billy-Jean, whoops, someone slipped!

I won't go into detail about religious rites of cutting, except to say that they are not always better, and rates of STDs in cut infants are a lot higher than in intact ones.

While you are free to do what you want with yours, provided that someone hasn't already made the choice to lop off the end for you, I know I'd rather one as nature intended it.  I'd also rather not chip my teeth on your ring, bar, or stud.  Bifurcation is another area I don't understand, and while it's a curiosity, it's not really something I want to investigate.

SO, Uncut, and not shaved/not hairy, but natural bush around the base is my preference.

My most intense experiences so far have been with docking, and lots of loose foreskin is very helpful for that activity.

Very true. I had a tight circumcision when i was younger. It made masturbation somewhat trickier. I have since stretched it out to comfortable degree. I hooked with this guy not too long ago who has a really tight circumcision. He can't jerk without lube; there's no play and nothing from the shaft even touches the sulcus when being stroked.

IMO circumcision is mutilation; I liken it to ear lobe gauging.

@Kinsey6:

@bluehue
Please  watch hxxp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EYAUazLI9k
Please download http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=77342

cute flash mob. it put a smile on my face, but it still didn't make want to dance 

i'm downloading the hedwig thing.

thanks. 

foreskin transplant?  :cry2:

very hot, and my favourite type of curve…  :hot2:

My uncut fetish has become such an obsession that it's becoming a deal-breaker when I meet guys.

I wonder how my preferences would differ if I were still intact? I guess I'll never now…

@uwsguy102:

My 2 cents, for what it's worth.

Reading the initial post, I get the feeling that you're unhappy in your life, and you have a notion that if you could just get things a certain way, everything would be perfect.

This is just my personal experience talking, but that's a fallacy on two counts. For one- if you're not happy in a situation, simply moving geography won't change it. Happiness (or, fulfillment, or whatever you want to call it) doesn't come from external sources. It comes from YOU, and ONLY you. Other people can SHARE in your happiness and ain't life grand when that happens, but if you're not happy in and of yourself, no one else can help you.

The second 'red flag' I see in that post is your very limited description of what you 'need' to make you happy. When you put blinders on and say, "I will only be happy when my life looks exactly like this: A, B, C, etc" you are simply setting yourself up for disappointment because nothing will ever be EXACTLY like you imagine in your mind.

If you're serious about getting in a situation like you describe, I'm sure there are plenty of men out there that would accommodate you. But if you go into the situation with the mindset you have now, I think you're just setting yourself up for failure. My advice would be fix whatever's wrong NOW, and then when you find the guy who will 'own' you, he will know that he has a quality piece of merchandise and he won't let it go for some 'blonde guy'…

Just a thought. You're an adult and you have to make your own decisions and live with the consequences. I wish you well.

Well said indeed.

this is a juicy one…  ;D

is it just me or shouldn't an aspiring 'bitchboi' be a little more accommodating rather than just demanding?

either way, i understand submitting to someone's control as a method to escape and essentially release reality and responsibility, but to not want to return from this state is beyond me. i like thinking for myself and manifesting my own destiny when i'm outside the bedroom.

if you really want to have your life controlled, why not just join the military?

i've still never seen an episode of glee. in fact the closest thing i've seen that resembles a musical are the simpsons episodes that break into song.

oh the garbage man can marge 

I'm partial to british and russian accents but certainly not australian nor scandanavian

those smug apple users  ::)

i don't even have an ipod. i use a sandisk product as it puts out better sound and has an equalizer.  :cool2:

i think apple is a good investment though. the products just aren't for those who value performance for price: people like me.

I read up on it, and now I'm taking it. We'll see how it goes…

check it out:

Chitosan is derived from chitin, a polysaccharide found in the exoskeleton of shellfish such as shrimp, lobster, and or crabs. Many sellers claim that chitosan causes weight loss by binding fats in the stomach and preventing them from being digested and absorbed. Some refer to it as a "fat magnet." It is even marketed as a weight-control product for dogs.

Although chitosan can decrease fat absorption, the amount contained in the capsules is too small to have much of an effect on cholesterol levels. Moreover, with better, more predictable cholesterol-lowering products available, it doesn't make much sense to use chitosan for that purpose. There is no evidence that chitosan is effective for weight control.

The British Advertising Standards Authority has upheld complaints about chitosan products advertised by eight companies. In the case where "Fat Magnets" capsules were described as "the much acclaimed fat absorbing food supplement," the Authority concluded:

The advertisers said the product was sold not on a slimming platform but on the grounds that, by absorbing fat, it prevented weight gain. They argued that the advertisement was for a food supplement, not a slimming aid, and was therefore not subject to Clause 51. [This clause states: Any claims made for the effectiveness or action of a slimming method or product should be backed where appropriate by rigorous practical trials on people; testimonials that are not supported by trials do not constitute substantiation.] The advertisers provided a technical report of the product's contents (which included Chitosan) and copies of nearly 30 trials carried out on animals, in vitro, and on humans. They provided the results of a telephone survey of 201 people. The Authority noted that respondents to the survey did not see the name in context and considered that readers would infer from the advertisement, partly because of the product's name, that the tablets would aid weight loss. Some of the trials showed a relationship between the consumption of Chitosan and weight loss over a four-week period for, in aggregate, a large number of people. The Authority took expert advice and concluded that there were many problems with, and incompatibilities between, the trials. It noted that the human trials that showed weight loss had appeared in a toxicology journal that was not known internationally for its expertise in weight-related matters. The Authority acknowledged the volume of material amassed by the advertisers but concluded that, because of the shortcomings in the reports of the trials, the ability of Chitosan to prevent the absorption of enough dietary fat to affect energy balance in humans had not been substantiated. Because of this and the product's name, the Authority asked the advertisers both to make clear in future that the product had not been proven to aid slimming or prevent weight gain and to consult the Copy Advice team before advertising the product again. [1]

Three studies have found no significant differences in weight or serum cholesterol levels between subjects who took chitosan and those who received a placebo. One study involved 30 overweight volunteers who received four capsules of either chitosan or a placebo for 28 consecutive days and were told to eat their normal diet. The chitosan and placebo groups showed no differences in weight or serum cholesterol levels [2]. The second study involved 51 healthy obese women followed for 8 weeks. The chitosan group had slightly (but not significantly) greater cholesterol reduction than the placebo group, but no difference in weight occurred between the two groups [3]. The other study, which involved 68 obese men and women, found no improvement in weight, body composition, blood pressure, or lipid profile [4].

Another study has found that the amount of fat actually removed by chitosan is insignificant. The study involved 15 men who consumed five meals per day for 12 days with a daily total of about 25 grams of fat. The amount of fat excreted during four days when they took chitosan supplements was then compared to the amount excreted without chirosan. Taking 10 capsules of chitosan per day increased fecal fat excretion by only about 1 gram (9 calories), which would have no significant effect on a person's weight [5].

U.S. Government Actions

On August 31, 1999, the FDA warned the president of TRY-Lean, Inc., to stop making claims that taking his company's chitosan-containing products would reduce the risk of obesity, high blood pressure, heart attack, and cancer [6].

In 2000, the marketers of "The Enforma System" agreed to settle FTC charges of deceptively advertising that the user could "eat what you want and never, ever, ever have to diet again." The FTC complaint named Enforma Natural Products, Inc., its president and chief executive officer, Andrew Grey, and Fred Zinos, a former vice president of sales and marketing. The system consists of "Fat Trapper," a chitosan-based product purported to prevent the absorption of dietary fat; and "Exercise In A Bottle," a pyruvate product that supposedly increases the body's capacity to burn fat. The system was promoted chiefly through televised 30-minute infomercials, featuring former baseball player Steve Garvey, as well as through the company's Web site. The settlement prohibits the marketers from making unsubstantiated claims that any product, service, or program: provides weight control without dieting or exercise; prevents fat absorption; increases metabolism; burns fat; or allows weight loss even if users eat high-fat foods. The company must also pay $10 million to be used for refunds or distributed to the U.S. Treasury [7].

simply religulous… lol

fuck yeah!

wow, that's young 

I still love my Unicos…

great post!

that's amazing. i know a macflurry doesn't melt, as it approaches room temperature.

as bad as macdonald's in, i'd still invest in the company.  :cool2:

@ballbustboy:

younger guys or with the same age as me: 24

i am indeed past my prime  :cry2:

maybe a peek of what you're grabbing at in those jeans?