@Niewiem13-0 Yes! That's him. Thank you! He's super cute, but I'm not paying $50 for a PPV vid on his OF lol. Wish there was a torrent here or something

@Niewiem13-0 Yes! That's him. Thank you! He's super cute, but I'm not paying $50 for a PPV vid on his OF lol. Wish there was a torrent here or something

Anyone know who this cutie is? And where can I find naked/sex vids of him? A torrent perhaps?

Yeah, the same thing happens to me sometimes when I do a search. There would be two identical torrents, one right after the other, with the same everything. Sometimes I've even seen more than two copies of the same torrent in a row, up to around 10 or so! :crazy2:

I didn't mean to sound demanding. If I did, I apologize. I can only imagine how much stuff needs to be done "behind the scenes" on a daily basis that we regular users don't even fathom. Making sure that a website runs smoothly can't be an easy task, especially one like GT.ru that so many people visit. And I do have to say that I am very happy with the new upgrades that were recently done to the site.  :clap2:  I just hate it every time I get slapped in the face by the daily limit announcement while I'm happily downloading torrents.  :blink:  But I'm sure they'll get to that update soon enough. So far I haven't been let down once by the guys here at GT.ru, so I'll just sit tight and wait for it to happen.   I mean, while still downloading torrents of course…

Just wondering… How's that update coming along?  :mbounce:  It's still gonna be implemented, right? :whistle:

I use GRINDR and I really like it. It's super convenient. It's gotten me laid over a dozen times in the last few months :bsex:  But I haven't been able to use it lately cuz I've been so busy with school.

I wanna try the other similar apps, Scruff and Growlr. Anyone know which one has the most "members"??

I absolutely LOVE the new Browse interface…from the subcategories and the mouse-over displays to the interface aesthetics. And being able to tell which torrents we've already downloaded (and which have completed) was SHEER GENIUS! :cheers:  Excellent job, guys! :hug2:

Hello y'all

That's great news! :cheers:  Can't wait for that update…patiently, of course. :thx:

I hate to bring this up again, but I still think that the new Rationator 3.0 rules are too restrictive for loyal members and would benefit from some improvements. First off, I do want to say that it was a great idea to implement the new system in order to ward off the cheaters and "hit and runners" and encourage uploads, and I'm glad that you are already seeing positive results with this new system. Kudos to whoever came up with it.

On the other hand, these rules are also negatively affecting your most loyal members, and though not everyone is equally affected, many people have already complained about this limitation. So there needs to be a solution to this dilemma. The way I see it is that the lower tiers of the Rationator table (low download amount) effectively target the cheaters and "hit and runners" and prevents them from downloading a large number of torrents without uploading and then abandoning their account. However, as you start to get into the upper tiers of the Rationator table (higher download amount and higher minimum ratio), it stops targeting the cheaters and "hit and runners" and starts affecting your loyal members more. There are several ways to potentially correct this issue.

Several members have mentioned this previously, but why not eliminate the daily download limit of torrent files altogether for people that have been members of the site for a long time, have their account in good standing (good share ratio), and have UPLOADED a lot of data?? For example, the Rationator rules would apply to everyone, up to the point that a member reaches maybe 1TB of uploaded data, maintains a share ratio above 1.0, AND has been a member for over a year. Or something along those lines. Members with these statistics have proven that they are loyal members that certainly do not intend on cheating or screwing everyone else over.

Another way to correct the issue would be to extend the Rationator table beyond >800 GB of download (or upload) amount with a corresponding increase in baseline daily download limit, WITHOUT capping the limit at 50 maximum daily downloads. For example, with <1.0 TB the limit would go to 30, with <1.5 TB the limit would go to 40, with <2.0 the limit would go to 45, and so on.

I'm sure that there are other ways to address the limitation that loyal members feel has been placed upon them. But it is an issue that should be corrected. Even though 50 daily torrent file downloads may seem like a lot to some, it may be very cumbersome to others. There are people that simply cannot visit the website daily and can only do so once a week or even less often due to the burdens of work or school, who would backtrack to the last time they downloaded torrents from the site and catch up on the torrents they've missed since then. The limit of 50 downloads would definitely get in the way in this case.

There are also collectors (I may fall in this category), whether with hoarding issues or not, that have days when they want to download more than 50 torrent files per day, and why shouldn't they be allowed to do so if they have maintained their account in good standing for a long time and have proven that they are loyal members of the site?? And I must say that this is especially the case recently, since so many deliciously hott-looking torrent are being uploaded since the lifting of the ban of certain studios (i.e. CF and Titan).

I apologize for the long post, but I think this is an important issue that should be further addressed and corrected, and I needed to express my opinions on the matter. I hope they're taken into consideration and that the appropriate changes be implemented soon or, otherwise, reasons and explanations be given for why these specific changes would not result in the benefit of the more loyal members as well as for the site itself. Despite all of this, I still really really like this site and want the best for it.

–CK