Dems think they tied Trump to Epstein - again. It blows up in their face - again. (update: Michael Wolff exposed) (update: Rep. Stacy Plaskett - D, exposed)
-
USA "House" Dems selected 3 out of 20,000 Epstein emails - they thought it worked for them.
I may post details later - like those emails.
For now, summary. Dems only proved
-
Epstein never got anything out of Trump. No kompromat, no info. Epstein calls Trump "dog that won't bark"
-
Virginia Giuffre "spent hours" with Trump and affirmed he did nothing (wrong) ever, she got nothing on him ever.
-
-Lib journalist Michael Wolff was friend to Epstein, so much, that Wolff tried to advise Epstein on how to still blackmail Trump- even tho Epstein got nothing / couldn't pull it off.
Only people as retarded as libs, could think Epstein question works for libs.
-
-
"Michael Wolff told Epstein he should try to end Trump’s 2016 campaign to save himself "
WTF? Lib writer, so TDS he conspired -with- Jeffrey Epstein?
“NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting,” Wolff wrote to Epstein on Feb. 19, 2016.
The since-deceased pedophile invited the writer to join him and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak for a meeting, but Wolff declined, and the two didn’t apparently trade emails again until Feb. 24 of that year.
“You [Epstein] can hang [contradict arbitrarily] him [Trump] in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you [from Democrats & USA Establishment], or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt,” Wolff added.
Wolff, in a lengthy March 18, 2016, email to Epstein, laid out a communications strategy for him during the election year, apparently in response to author James Patterson writing a book about the financier that required “an immediate counter narrative.”
“You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then,” he wrote. “That being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It’s a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story.
“Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don’t have now. Still, this necessary [sic] involves you going public,” he added.
Mic dropUSA media, Michael Wolff, Dems & Establishment are what was just discredited & exposed.
The “strategic plan,” Wolff explained, should be in the interests of “involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place.”
“Filthy Rich: The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein” was published by Little, Brown and Company on Oct. 20, 2016.
Nine days later, Wolff followed up with Epstein: “There’s an opportunity to come forward this week and talk about Trump in such a way that could garner you great sympathy and help finish him. Interested?”
Wolff [went on to be] the author of the supposed tell-all about the first Trump White House...panned by fellow journalists for its shoddy reporting, with The Washington Post describing many of its mistakes as apparent evidence that it wasn’t “clear the book was vetted.”
When confronted with other factual errors in his follow-up book...Wolff fumed in a June 2019 interview on the Yahoo News podcast “Skullduggery”: “Even if I was wrong, I’m not going to admit it to you.”
The Daily Beast also had to retract an article earlier this year based on claims Wolff made on a podcast alleging a modeling agent connected to notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania Trump to her husband.
"Trump-obsessed writer Michael Wolff encouraged Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail then-presidential candidate Donald, emails reveal"
-
@blablarg18 said in Dems think they tied Trump to Epstein - again. It blows up in their faces - again. (update: Michael Wolff exposed):
Epstein calls Trump "dog that won't bark"
That's not the quote, and you clearly don't understand what he was saying.
The idiom Epstein's referring to is "If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, then the one that hollers is the one you hit." It means that if you say something generally about a group of people, then the person(s) who complain are likely the people the statement is true about. If you throw out an general accusation, then the one who starts denying it is likely the guilty party.
Epstein's saying that Trump is a guilty dog, but he hasn't barked yet. Whether Trump did or did not do anything wrong, clearly Epstein thought he did.
-
@blablarg18 According to Megyn Kelly, being with a 15-year old doesn't necessarily make Epstein a "pedophile" anyway: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/megyn-kelly-jeffrey-epstein-pedophile-b2865189.html
I'm sure Trump was with a 15-year olds so he's not really a pedophile.
-
- Trump calls for Epstein file release.
Libs: I saw it coming. & U should have.
in July I posted this:
trump got libs to do meme
- Why would he? becuz EPSTEIN HAS ALWAYS BEEN DEM-ALIGNED.
Really libs: If u can't see when Trump gives u psych op...... wow.
Dems had YEARS to nail Trump over Epstein. & couldn't.
Virginia Guiffre exonerated Trump.
Epstein hung out with Bill Gates (MSNBC, covid vaxx).... Prince Andrew (globalist)..... Bill Clinton..... allegedly, Dem billionaire Reid Hoffman.
- Wanna see how libs / Dems worked with convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein?
-
Michael Wolff thing, above. But there's more!
-
Rep. Stacy Plaskett, D, -literally texted with convicted pedophile during House committee hearings for his advice on how to spin things his way-.
Jeffrey Epstein was feeding questions to Rep. Stacey Plaskett during a 2019 congressional hearing — and giving her real time help on how to damage President Trump’s reputation, newly released documents show.
The texts, first reported by the Washington Post, show the convicted pedophile pontificating with Plaskett during a Feb. 27, 2019 House Oversight Committee hearing in which the then-former president’s ex-attorney Michael Cohen testified about Trump’s alleged payments to mistresses to silence stories before the 2016 election. Trump has vehemently denied all allegations.
In the texts, Epstein appeared to be watching on television while Cohen brought up former Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff in his testimony.
“Cohen brought up RONA – keeper of the secrets,” Epstein texted, misspelling Graff’s first name.
“RONA??” responded Plaskett, a non-voting delegate representing the US Virgin Islands. “Quick I’m up next is that an acronym,” she added, suggesting she’d grill Cohen soon.
“Thats his assistant,” Epstein replied.
The text messages also show Epstein influenced what questions Cohen [was] asked [by Plaskett].
“Hes opened the door to questions re who are the other henchmen at trump org,” Epstein texted Plaskett at 12:25 p.m.
“Yup. Very aware and waiting my turn,” she responded.
Plaskett began questioning Cohen at 2:28 p.m. and asked about Graff, as well as with other Trump associates Epstein had mentioned
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahaa
- & so...... Dems GO BACK - as they have for years - to BLOCK Epstein files.
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) tried to cut through the political theater Wednesday by bringing a unanimous consent request to the House floor. His goal was simple: release all remaining Epstein files immediately.
Democrats blocked it.
After Democrats released their three carefully selected emails out of context, Republicans responded by releasing all 20,000 documents. Democrats got angry about that move, which tells you everything you need to know about their supposed commitment to transparency.
The so-called bombshell unraveled as quickly as it appeared once people actually read the emails. They didn't implicate Trump at all.
- Trump even orders new Epstein investigations.
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1989356982550331637/photo/1
- @gorangbang-0 You meant Clinton. Clinton banged 15 year olds.
Virginia Guiffre has always exonerated Trump.
- Summary. With release of Epstein emails, we learned
-
Epstein hated Trump, didn't trust him, was out to get him, but failed / had nothing.
-
NYT directly worked with Epstein to suppress bad stories about Epstein.
-
Dems directly worked with Epstein to get Trump - with hoaxes like Michael Cohen, Russiagate & more - as Dem-Epstein alliance had nothing real.
-
After Bradley Edwards (lawyer for the accusers) said that Trump was the only individual to cooperate and help, Epstein said Trump didn’t have “one decent cell in his body.”
-
Dems fake-redacted name of Virginia Giuffre, who publicly testified that Trump was innocent.
Missing puzzle piece........ it's never stated, but more things would make sense, thus u can kinda-maybe see its outlines............ is........
.......... -Trump maybe was Bruce Wayne-type informant against Epstein?- - But we shall see.
https://x.com/magills_/status/1989073320877387856/photo/1
-
Lib MASSIVE self-own. WOW it gives & gives.
- The Guardian agrees.
Rep Plaskett - D, took programming & $$$$ from sex predator. (& Trump never)
https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-guardian-usa/20251115/281732685759708
https://x.com/RepLuna/status/1990536078781264314/photo/1
- vid matches: Epstein instructions to Plaskett to testimony, in real time
https://x.com/i/status/1990458464376864997
More example texts
Epstein: “Ask about Moscow project.”
Plaskett: “Quick, I’m up—what else?”
Epstein: “Push Stormy payoff.”
Epstein after: “Good work.”RACE ELEMENT:
Black Lib Plaskett took head pats, nearly "Good girl!", from White lib slaver (human trafficker)
cringe
- Rep. Cammack - R, calls out Rep. Plaskett D, cuz Plaskett took pedophile $$$$$$$$
vid - https://x.com/i/status/1990531084648693949
“I just have to state for the record that I, myself, am deeply concerned about the affiliation of the convicted sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein, of which the ranking member took campaign donation money from”
- Why must Dems vote to release files? (& Won't)
Becuz 3 DEM-appointed judges seal again & again.
vid - https://x.com/i/status/1990565392293503333
Robin L. Rosenberg (Obama), Paul A. Engelmayer (Obama), Richard R. Berman (Clinton).
Why should Trump defy those judges?
No, make Dems vote to override judges. & Dems won't. Becuz................. Epstein is theirs.