The experts weigh in.
-
@Rapsey-0 To be precise: All I do is show up & say what I know. Numerically I "dominate" ie. post a lot - am sure you meant that. But that's on others who don't show up / don't post.
Some don't, because they're disinterested or busy - Great. No problem. Will happen to me, any day.
But others, ie. certain libs who would show more, if they perceived a "safe space" where they get no resistance.... don't show - just because they HAAAaaaaate to get resistance or have their bubbles popped.
Those folks, on occasion may stop by to piss & shit.
(& still their bubbles are popped)
-
@blablarg18 That is indeed how I meant it, referring solely to the volume of posts. I probably should've chosen my words with more sensitivity but you know that's not how we do things.
It makes sense for people to prefer the comfort of like-minded individuals over infuriating arguments, and I'm pretty sure that effect happens on both sides. I don't mean to imply that anyone is at fault for it. Seems natural for things to play out that way. But I also think it's something we should try to overcome or we might be doomed to live in this polarized clown world nightmare forever.
-
@Rapsey-0 said in The experts weigh in.:
So if you ever see me saying something you think is dumb and you feel like telling me why.
"Just imagine what struggle session it must've been for them to resist putting Obama as #1"
Do you think that statement rises to the level of the discourse you are proposing? Or perhaps was it rather meant to disparage, by pure conjecture on your part, the far-right, rather than the "conservative-leaning" groups' favorite hit list: Obama, liberals, academics, etc.?
Think very carefully before you say "it was just a joke."
Good day, sir.
-
@jaroonn I was mocking the tendency of people on the left to idolize Obama. Could you please explain how this is disparaging and to whom?
I don't expect you to agree with how I would rate Obama's performance as president, or with my assessment of how he is regarded. But if you're going to suggest that I'm being derogatory then by all means, make your case.
-
@Rapsey-0 said in The experts weigh in.:
I was mocking the tendency of people on the left to idolize Obama. Could you please explain how this is disparaging and to whom?
So in your dictionary "mocking" is not a form of "disparaging"? In that case, I was only "mocking" the tendency of trailer-people and the like to idolize Trump.
-
You are just a pompous twat, who likes to think that he's superior to those he disagrees with.
You remind me of the chick on the Jubilee episode who claimed to be the superior intellect of the group because she had a PHD and worked for a company (not stated which) that was working on covid vaccines. Turns out, she had the lowest IQ of the group.
You are the reason we routinely mock "true journalism" aka leftist narrative-driven "news".
Your "true journalism" claims they can't talk about minors unless they are white.
Your "true journalism" won't mention the races involved if the narrative doesn't make whites the evil ones.
You also support grooming kids.
You think it's ok to provide very young kids with porn, but that parents can't read that same shit out loud in public meetings.
You can call me trailer trash if you wish, but you have no fucking clue about me.
BTW, how many times are you going to rage quit and come back only to spew the same shit?!
-
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
You are just a pompous twat, who likes to think that he's superior to those he disagrees with.
I'm surprised you didn't choke on that sentence. Your hypocrisy is stunning.
-
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
You think it's ok to provide very young kids with porn, but that parents can't read that same shit out loud in public meetings.
Right. I have those exact works printed on a t-shirt and a bumper sticker.
Do you really wonder when you say ridiculous things like this that it's difficult to take you seriously? Why do you equate gender identification and sexual orientation with porn? You might as well just call me a "communist" and move on because you are incapable of serious conversation.
-
You are the one acting as if you are superior to everyone you disagree with by calling us trailer trash and claiming we are uneducated.
You are the one that claims you get your "news" from "true journalism" which constantly proves it's nothing but leftist shit.
-
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
You remind me of the chick on the Jubilee episode who claimed to be the superior intellect of the group because she had a PHD and worked for a company (not stated which) that was working on covid vaccines. Turns out, she had the lowest IQ of the group.
WTF?
-
@jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
You remind me of the chick on the Jubilee episode who claimed to be the superior intellect of the group because she had a PHD and worked for a company (not stated which) that was working on covid vaccines. Turns out, she had the lowest IQ of the group.
WTF?
Maybe you should look it up and watch it.
-
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
but you have no fucking clue about me.
You, on the other hand, profess to have a window into my soul.
-
@jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
You think it's ok to provide very young kids with porn, but that parents can't read that same shit out loud in public meetings.
Right. I have those exact works printed on a t-shirt and a bumper sticker.
Do you really wonder when you say ridiculous things like this that it's difficult to take you seriously? Why do you equate gender identification and sexual orientation with porn? You might as well just call me a "communist" and move on because you are incapable of serious conversation.
We've discussed the porn that your side is putting in school libraries.
You support books that discuss anal sex and other sexual stuff in elementary schools aka for 5-10yo kids.
You supported giving young school kids wooden penises in a recent thread.
You and your ilk are nothing more than groomers and pedos.
You, people, are the ones claiming that not being allowed to talk to kids about sex is "LGBT genocide".
Strangely, you people love putting books in school libraries, but don't want parents to read from them or show pages from the books in public meetings because they are deemed "offensive" to liberal adults.
-
Your own words in the various threads show what you are about.
I haven't called you trailer trash or the like because I don't know you.
-
@raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:
You support books that discuss anal sex and other sexual stuff in elementary schools aka for 5-10yo kids.
You supported giving young school kids wooden penises in a recent thread.No and no.
-
@raphjd I never called you "trailer trash." Never.
-
This picture was taken in 2012, while Obama was President.
Your "true journalism" withheld the set of pictures, then published them in 2017 claiming they were taken while Trump was President.
They knowingly lied and people like you just believed it even after the truth came out.
-
@jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:
The level of discourse at your trailer park roundtables is truly inspiring. lol
This is aimed at those you disagree with.
-
Umm, are you saying you didn't support schools giving kids wooden penises along with that BLM and trans propaganda?
-
Ok, you didn't like that specific thing.
MY BAD
That being said, you do like K-5 kids being provided with porn.
