Conservative Hypocrisy
-
-
I know you have a fucked up view on what "true journalism" is, but you also said that you do not believe that Kyle Rittenhouse killed 4 black men.
Salon, along with Slate, The "fuck white people" Root and Joy Reid said, even after the Rittenhouse trial that Kyle killed 4 black men. It was discussed here before during and after the trial. Yet you still post their shit.
Hmm.
-
NOTE: I'm an atheist, so I don't give a fuck about the exact details of this case. I do care about the overall principles though.
There is a huge difference between threats of violence and actual violence against jews, and not wanting a statue. I know you losers don't understand that.
I know you are extremely clueless, but your side has been anti-free speech for 15+ years. If we add Canada into the mix, your side has been killing free speech about 20 years.
Your side gave birth to free speech on campus and killed it on the very same campus; Berkeley.
Please tell us, how many occupied buildings have conservatives set on fire to prevent someone from speaking?
How many riots have broken out by conservatives to prevent speech vs how many have broken out to prevent speech liberals don't want?
-
The most outrageous example of hypocrisy is how the democrats are constantly waving the flag of "democracy" (when in fact the USA is a Republic, not a democracy). It is an insult to people's intelligence when democrats in the house of representatives are elected to represent their districts - but that is NOT what those democrat representatives do! They all vote as a unified block - as a party. Those democrat representatives don't represent the people, they represent whoever is pulling the strings in the democrat party - which is most likely STILL Pelosi.
-
@lololulu19 said in Conservative Hypocrisy:
They all vote as a unified block - as a party.
Republicans NEVER do that.....lmao!
-
@raphjd Every word of that article is true and you know it. It's so much fun watching you squirm. Grab a Miller Lite and let's talk....lmao
-
@raphjd said in Conservative Hypocrisy:
Salon, along with Slate, The "fuck white people" Root and Joy Reid said, even after the Rittenhouse trial that Kyle killed 4 black men
They never reported that. Ever. I defy you to find the articles. I am certainly not saying that "true journalists" don't make errors. But when they do, they correct them. They have to because journalists care about the truth. Your lot (Fox, Breitbart, etc.) don't give a shit. They post lies so often they don't even care or know what's true. But it doesn't matter. You will go on to believe that crap because it fits your worldview: racism and fascism. You can project all you want against the Left, but the only ones who are buying it are your fellow klansmen.
-
I posted about it here at the time.
I even had an argument with another member (a RINO) repeating that bullshit.
But of course, you know everything because you're a liberal.
-
@raphjd said in Conservative Hypocrisy:
But of course, you know everything because you're a liberal.
No I don't. Nor do I pretend to. I am willing to accept any facts when presented as facts. Show me. I am very Missourian in that respect.
-
I posted a screenshot of a Reuters tweet. You instantly claimed it was a lie.
You post a clearly edited article Reuters article that doesn't tell us what they edited or how many times it was edited. You claim that it's always been the truth because we don't know what they said prior to the various stealth edits.
Tell me again how you need "proof" when liberals outlets say something.
Let's not forget that your side believed the CT theories spread by your "true journalism".
-
@raphjd I am still waiting for your evidence. The original articles from Salon, and the original tweet from Reuters. Still waiting.
I mean I get it. You guys have to be so frustrated. For years now, you've had to spin and lie to cover up the shit show that Trump and Jordan and Comer and MTG and all the other clowns who have taken over the GOP have been parading. But see, it doesn't work on intelligent people. This is why intelligent people do not watch Fox or Breitbart. And this is why the Right loves to attack academics and experts...because they hate intelligent people because we see through the BS.
Sorry, but that's just the way it is. You can decide for yourself who you want to be with.
Good luck.
-
I'm not gonna dig up stuff for you, because you can do that yourself.
We saw that your beloved "true journalism" made at least 1 stealth edit. They could have made many, many more to that article but won't tell us that.
Say what you will but you people have a proven track record.
YOU PEOPLE won't even watch a Tucker video where he shows the video of the "51 intel experts" go on TV and lie and then he compares it to their now declassified testimony in Shitty Schft's secret hearings in the bunker, which were constantly leaked. YOU PEOPLE refused to do this because it would prove that you were lied to.
YOU PEOPLE won't watch the Steven Crowder video where he takes the public voter rolls around Wayne County MI, showing that registered voters were claiming they lived at self storage units, abandoned parking lots and countless other places that are not RESIDENCES. Again, you people refused to look at it because your "true media" already sold you the bullshit narrative and you didn't want to learn the truth.
There are countless examples of YOU PEOPLE being spoon fed the truth, only for you clowns to refuse to see the truth.
-
@raphjd said in Conservative Hypocrisy:
There are countless examples of YOU PEOPLE being spoon fed the truth, only for you clowns to refuse to see the truth.
Countless...millions...because you say so (but can only come up with a couple rather pointless examples).
In the meantime...you've got Trump and co.
Like I've said many times before; it really doesn't matter what you and your kind want to believe. So far it is pretty inconsequential. It is a phenomenon that will be studied by future historians like when people believed in witchcraft, eugenics, and the like. People will scratch their heads and think "what the hell was wrong with them?"
-
LOL, you can't post anything other than "Orange man bad". That shows your "true journalism" really blinded you to reality.
You just admitted that the truth means nothing to you. Thank you, that's a start for your recovery.
-
@raphjd I can't help you anymore. Just stick with your special needs "news" sources.
Merry Christmas.
-
Says the guy that claims "true journalism" and stealth editing is the same thing.
-
Constitution of the State of Iowa, codified.
Preamble. WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF IOWA, grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings
hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of those blessings, do ordain and
establish a free and independent government....Satan is by definition, enemy of Supreme Being (God). Even its followers say so.
When followers put its bullcrap in Iowa State Capitol, by definition they commit insurrection against Iowa government.
Didn't libs say at one point, insurrection is bad?
Now, you can argue any tension of that vs. USA First Amendment. BUT, before it can get to USA Courts there must be injury - a question to decide.
So yes the display must be removed.
After removal, argument before court that Iowa constitution conflicts with USA.
To recap,
-
people who want removal, correctly follow Iowa Constitution
-
people who say that violates USA Constitution, jump the gun
Final point: Libs have a reputation as both pedos & satanists...... ummm...... @jaroonn any guess why?
@raphjd said in Conservative Hypocrisy:
but your side has been anti-free speech for 15+ years
Oh ya that is other thing...... Post should be titled "Liberal Hypocrisy".
Libs, after systematic fight for censorship, for satan suddenly want free speech....... Fuck off, pompous evil retards.
-
-
Satanic idol at Iowa State Capitol BEHEADED by Christian veteran
A legal process will play out..... UNLIKE for activists of Antifa & BLM, Burn Loot Murder..... who burn stores or destroy entire downtowns - & usually get away with it.
Because USA is undemocratic, has 2-tier justice.
![original_satan_1[1].jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1702593862070-original_satan_1-1.jpeg)
-
@blablarg18 said in Conservative Hypocrisy:
Constitution of the State of Iowa, codified.
Preamble. WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF IOWA, grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings
hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of those blessings, do ordain and
establish a free and independent government....Preambles don't have legal effect. What does have legal effect from that 1857 Constitution is Section 3 which says:
Sec. 3 Religion. The general assembly shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; nor shall any person be compelled to attend any place of worship, pay tithes, taxes, or other rates for building or repairing places of worship, or the maintenance of any minister, or ministry.
-
While I recognize that most Republicans are grossly hypocritical when it comes to Freedom of Religion and the Free Exercise thereof, to be completely fair to the State of Iowa, the Republicans in its House seem to be divided on the issue.
I can't say that I totally disagree with Rep. Jon Dunwell's sentiments from this article from the Christian Post.
LINK: Satanic display in Iowa State Capitol stirs debate among GOP lawmakers: 'Outrage and disgust'
