More childish leftism
-
LOL Okay, perhaps flaming over turned cars was an extreme example, but to follow someone out of "Politics and Debate" all over every area of the forum down voting and mad facing everything they write is exactly that, a form of vandalism. You are attempting to deface that party via what ever means available.
Once again I don't condone the "stalker's" behaviour. All I'm saying is your conclusion is far-fetched!
Again, you are entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that up/down votes really never should have been part of this particular area of the forum.
I don't necessarily agree with you here but I can begrudgingly accept they remove the system for that part of the forum…
Also you said this earlier:
@Gianni89:In short, the up vote/down vote function really never had a place in a debate forum as debate is not a popularity contest,
In theory you're right and I wish it were still the case but the public debate has become more or less a popularity contest. Were you sleeping during the 2016 presidential race!?
**_LOL as you pointed out this is a porn sharing site, not the Supreme Court's blog, this SECTION of the forum is for members who wish to discuss/debate current affairs. Obviously Raph has chosen not to ban the stalker, rather it is pretty obvious at least to me he is trying to bait him into a battle of wits.
Calling people names is baiting him into a "battle of wits" to you!? Not sure if we've got the same meaning of the term.
If this were an old movie these two would wind up fucking for sure. ;D THAT is conjecture on my part of course.
Conjecture, perhaps. Unlikely, maybe not. Who knows. ;D
A very hackneyed ending though.As for the banning - if it were going to happen I suspect it would already have been done - as a Mod he has that authority. The little red thumb? Also his call. Personally I won't miss it.
I know he has the authority, my problem is the matter is up for debate.
But I have an idea, instead of getting rid of the system what about not linking the votes to the reputation? At least for this section of the forum.
I'd be totally on board with that!_** -
LOL Okay, perhaps flaming over turned cars was an extreme example, but to follow someone out of "Politics and Debate" all over every area of the forum down voting and mad facing everything they write is exactly that, a form of vandalism. You are attempting to deface that party via what ever means available.
Once again I don't condone the "stalker's" behaviour. All I'm saying is your conclusion is far-fetched!
Again, you are entitled to your opinion. My opinion is that up/down votes really never should have been part of this particular area of the forum.
I don't necessarily agree with you here but I can begrudgingly accept they remove the system for that part of the forum…
Also you said this earlier:
@Gianni89:In short, the up vote/down vote function really never had a place in a debate forum as debate is not a popularity contest,
In theory you're right and I wish it were still the case but the public debate has become more or less a popularity contest. Were you sleeping during the 2016 presidential race!?
**_LOL as you pointed out this is a porn sharing site, not the Supreme Court's blog, this SECTION of the forum is for members who wish to discuss/debate current affairs. Obviously Raph has chosen not to ban the stalker, rather it is pretty obvious at least to me he is trying to bait him into a battle of wits.
Calling people names is baiting him into a "battle of wits" to you!? Not sure if we've got the same meaning of the term.
If this were an old movie these two would wind up fucking for sure. ;D THAT is conjecture on my part of course.
Conjecture, perhaps. Unlikely, maybe not. Who knows. ;D
A very hackneyed ending though.As for the banning - if it were going to happen I suspect it would already have been done - as a Mod he has that authority. The little red thumb? Also his call. Personally I won't miss it.
I know he has the authority, my problem is the matter is up for debate.
But I have an idea, instead of getting rid of the system what about not linking the votes to the reputation? At least for this section of the forum.
I'd be totally on board with that!I am not sure if you can set features by section I suppose it must be possible, however that still leaves him only one option in dealing with his would be nemesis. I don't think you can remove the option by user. De-linking it to reputation would seem to sort of disable the reputation "feature" all together. The obvious "grown up" answer to this is that said party historically known as "wafflez" just quit behaving like a 14 year old school girl. <–- NOTE: Nothing sexist in that comment, if you know any ACTUAL 14 year old girls you know that is a statement of relevant fact. I have a little sister, I have seen first hand.
The mere fact I felt compelled to add that last part. :-X_**
-
Disabling it by section would be better otherwise it'd kill the reputation feature as you said.
The obvious "grown up" answer to this is that said party historically known as "wafflez" just quit behaving like a 14 year old school girl.
Well, in a perfect world you also wouldn't need keys, alarms, passwords or the police. Unfortunately some people will abuse their freedoms.
<–- NOTE: Nothing sexist in that comment, if you know any ACTUAL 14 year old girls you know that is a statement of relevant fact. I have a little sister, I have seen first hand.
The mere fact I felt compelled to add that last part. :-X
Don't get me started, please
-
Post owner could be able to respond by neutralizing incoming smiles into something like below.
So there is a simple way to respond to that behavior in the right spirit :).
-
If my stalker has the right to stalk me and down vote/angry face all of my posts, regardless of content, then I have the right to call him a brain dead, dickless, loser.
As I said before, if I was looking for an excuse to ban him, I could have done that back in 2015 and pretty much any day since.
-
Did I say you didn't have the right to call him names?
I meant you can't call someone names and then expect them to turn up for a debate!!
I also meant both behaviour are childish. What happened to being the bigger person!?But raphjd, you didn't answer the question: is there a way to un-link the upvote/downvote system from the reputation feature for this section of the forum?
I think it'd be a happy medium: it's not censorious and somebody's reputation can't be abused. -
The forum software isn't very user friendly on the admin side. The stuff it built in and not a plug in.
For 3 years I've tried to get my stalker to debate, rather than hide in the shadows being a typical leftist loser. He stopped stalking me for a while but fairly recently something crawled up his vag and he started again. Eventually I changed my signature and started treating him like he deserves to be treated.
I mean, how fucking mental do you have to be to angry face a post where I condemn genocide?! He pathological.
He's also a liar. He said he was gonna stop stalking me, but less than 2 hours later he was back doing it and hasn't stopped.
-
Has anyone noticed that leftists never engage in actual debate but attack me personally?
They angry face my posts condemning like genocide, Facebook wanting your banking details, etc.
Or they write a post to personally attack me for saying sweatshops and child labor is evil.
Not surprisingly, these are things they wanted others banned for. Even then they were too stupid to realize that they were violating the same rules they demand I enforce on others.
It's as if it's their version of the bike lock of peace.
-
Hypocrisy is real. It isn't always easy to look at the dark side of a story that has been thoroughly whitewashed for their consumption. From what I have seen of your stalker, if they can't put the subject to rest in one easy package, they fall back on a lot of canned diatribe - then resort to calling YOU a child when you point out the flaw in the approach. To put it simply, it takes effort to actually debate something. That party has zero interest in actual debate.
I would suggest they simply stick with threads that only require simple answers, like "The biggest dick you have ever taken". Just sayin. Although I expect if "said party" is only interested in instant gratification that may also be an issue, cuz someone has ALWAYS ridden a bigger dick, but DID they know how to use it?! :cheesy2: :cheers:
-
It's not just my stalker who does it. DrWas popped in just to insult me rather than discuss anything. Many other liberals have done the same.
There are liberals here who that I respect, despite the fact that I disagree with them, because they have engaged in actual debate.
-
Haters gonna hate. It's easy to trash someone "drive by" style, but the fact they don't engage just makes them look insignificant. More importantly it's a type of hazing that seems to occur when the argument they have been trying to make winds up failing scrutiny, or they want to "come for you" but they haven't the constitution to get the job done.
-
It looks like DrWas got another bug up his/her vag and had to have a play with my posts again.
-
The woke crowd run out of words and arguments pretty quickly, usually by now anyone who doesn't kowtow to them gets banned or doxxed or cancelled, so it is good to have a single place in the netiverse where one doesn't get eliminated for not agreeing with their fascism. But when everything is not stacked their way they shut up, take their ball and go home. This is not enough of a safespace for these pathetic, worthless snowflakes so they probably all melted away.
-
I think that being on the left is fine, as long as it isn't extremist or radical, because that's unhealthy. I'm more of a centrist, but I can see what you mean.
-
Looks like my stalkers are back with bugs up their vaginas.
