Jump-on / re-seed during new uploads
-
Thank you blackdid, I contacted both the jump-on seeder and the staff here, and saved screen shots, before I posted in this forum.
Great, I'm very happy for you, joeblow123
Now back to wombat2 … because he doesn't want to stop his attacks, even after I thanked him in my last post.
-
"I want ALL the credit" followed your wonderful question, which was, let's remember it : "You want ALL the credit for yourself??"
I replied in the same tone as your question, but you even can't see (or don't want to see) this kind of things. -
I edited my post yesterday at exactly 10h52 : « Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:52:08 pm by blackdid »
And I did that because I still had things to say, then I saw your answer (posted a few min ago after my edit) and thanked you for this answer, thinking this would stop your personal attacks.
But no, you keep on writing bad things even after my last post was :
"Thank you" :hug:Amice explained you why you were wrong, concerning this jump-on thing, Mgr, Uwe etc.. don't like at all people who jump on fresh torrents until they're not snatched by 3-4 other members.
Now, when you write this : "Well actually there was another seeder for 2 seconds.. ME.. I saw your post & was only checking…"
Why the hell do you want to check by jumping on my torrent ???
You see my movie's size in the description page, right ?
You see the extension of my movie in the description page.
You see the size of your own movie.If, with all these infos, you jump-on my torrent to "check" I don't know what, then something is really going wrong from your side.
Well, I wanted to stop this personal attack but you are the one who started them in your first post and you are the one that doesn't want to stop them even after I thanked you in my last post, so yes, I consider you are a very negative person who enjoys creating endless trouble.
Let's see how this will go, until the Mods close this thread.
-
-
I think jumping on a torrent is immature as waiting for someone to make a nice meal and then stealing it from them.
If you are a victim of jumping on the do the following:
-
PM the user and politely ask them to stop seeding your torrent until 3 or 4 other users have snatched it.
-
PM and online mod and make us aware of the situation. We will usually PM the user and note in there profile that they are jumping on torrents.
-
Save screenshots of your torrent as proof.(Don't wait to long or other "real" leechers may snag you torrent)
From there the staff will deal with it. This is a pet peeve of mine so please let us know if we can help.
-
-
EDIT: Modified as per the following msg from amice..
@blackdid:I will try to explain one more time..
1.. I initially missunderstood what you meant by "CREDIT"
2.. I offered you a :hug: @ 10:43:07.. you then edited you post & added the "Btw" @ 10:52:08 & then accepted my :hug: @ 10:54:24.. YESTERDAY
By you editing without showing an EDIT: it could appear that I accepted your edited post, with it's offensive "Btw", & was THEN giving you a :hug:It was only TODAY while adding a constructive suggestion, in a reply to amice, that I noticed your "secret" edits.. & was annoyed by your "Btw" as posting torrents here cost me a £1250 fine [including costs].. & IMO I contribute, in an indirect manner, to ALL the torrent sites, by only posting torrents for movies "that have not appeared on the other sites as yet" on the .org site for others to post elsewhere [hopefully having added a simple THANKS, there, if they are going to get the kudos on those sites]..
Checking YOUR torrent:
To explain.. When you buy a movie & rip or convert it using a program like TMPEnc the resulting avi etc is unique.. If I convert, using the same program, a 2nd time there will be a slight change in the result.. By downloading your torrent & doing a hash check I could see that it WAS my conversion [100% not %99.9] & I left before connecting to you or any Ls..It is NOT my intention to make a "personal attack".. but only to point out your confrontational manner & inconsistencies eg:
And I'm not, as you say, "on a witch hunt.. wanting members banned for trying to increase their ratios"
&
@blackdid:I just sent a PM to both of them, but really this "jump on" situation is not acceptable, a rule could be :
- Staff warns the user who jumps on (with a pic proof in Staff's hands) and in case same user is caught a 2nd time…
- Ban him.
That, IMO, is not being constructive..
-
one plea to you: when you only quote the previous message, without need to pick up concrete statements, erase all text except the quote header between:
[ quote ] & [ /quote ]
the quote link is still clickable; those who want to read what you are refering to, can get there via this link. like this:
-
I think jumping on a torrent is immature as waiting for someone to make a nice meal and then stealing it from them.
If you are a victim of jumping on the do the following:
-
PM the user and politely ask them to stop seeding your torrent until 3 or 4 other users have snatched it.
-
PM and online mod and make us aware of the situation. We will usually PM the user and note in there profile that they are jumping on torrents.
-
Save screenshots of your torrent as proof.(Don't wait to long or other "real" leechers may snag you torrent)
From there the staff will deal with it. This is a pet peeve of mine so please let us know if we can help.
Hi Brandon, I like what you wrote and totally agree with it.
Would it be possible to include it in GT's rules ?
Dear wombat2
I really think we should stop this now or it will never end.
But you force me to reply, as I notice that you read only what you want to read, why you ask ?You're wrong when you write : "I offered you a :hug: @ 10:43:07.. you then edited you post & added the "Btw" @ 10:52:08 & then accepted my :hug: @ 10:54:24.."
Because I didn't add only a "Btw" sentence, I added 2 LONG chapters starting with "And I'm not, as you say, "on a witch hunt.. " plus another one starting with "(though I was 100% sure the same movie…", just re-read better my 2 quoted paragraphs you pasted in your message !
It took me several minutes to add/edit these paragraphs and you had already answered at 10h43 when I was still editing my message : you got to understand that if I start to edit my message at, let's say, 10h42, then your answer is not in the Forum, as demonstrated right now, here :
http://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=14325.msg62594#msg62594(you see i posted a test message at 6:00pm and immediately edited it, waiting patiently more than 10 min, just to make sure that the "Edit time" is the time when you END the edit and not when you START the edit)
So yes, while I was modifying my message, you posted your reply (that I couldn't see) and at 10h52, when I ended my editing, I read your answer and immediately hugged you at 10h54
Concerning the "ban" thing : I never wrote that a user should be banned the FIRST time he's been caught jumping-on a fresh torrent.
Read again what you quoted : "Staff warns the user who jumps on (with a pic proof in Staff's hands) and in case same user is caught a 2nd time…"
Where do you read I want someone banned when he's caught jumpin-on for the 1st time ?Also, why don't you quote what I answered Amice yestersday : "it should be possible to block (momentarily) his access to GT tracker ?"
Do you see this "momentarily" word that makes all the difference ?
I'm not for banning anyone without warnings (ok, maybe 2 warnings should be better than one), but if there was an explicit rule concerning this jump-on issue, and same members who have been warned once or twice keep on jumping-on, what would you like to do ? To let them endlessly jump-on fresh torrents, no matter how many warnings they got ?
Sorry I don't agree with that point of view.
Concerning the "Thanks" given by leechers to the original poster : I would like to tell you that, believe it or not, I got several great uploaders who thank ME (not on porn sites) because I thank them not only by a cold "thanks" but with long public passionate answers (concerning for example a Stevie Wonder concert or any kind of concert or movie or album that I really enjoyed), explaining them what moved me in this special event and sharing my passion with all. They tell me it's because of detailed answers like that they enjoy uploading stuff, because robotic "thanks" are really too cold, at least for me.
And If I was "selfish" as you said, I won't give away all my Seed bonus points to members or Mods (the ones who gift users) . I've been kindly gifted SBP by great members, so it's normal to give all my SBP (present and future) to these persons.
Well, this being said, why not trying to forget all this and keep this place cool ?
I've heard that you're a great poster with genuine torrents and I respect that.What drives me nuts is that there are no strict rules to prevent this jump-on issue.
I'm very happy (more than you'll ever think) that joeblow123 could upload his torrent and fix a bit his ratio issue because I like it when people are happy, it's a warm feeling when you feel that people are happy, don't you feel same ?What made me really sad is joeblow123's 1st message (and its crying icon) and to know that a guy like him, having a ratio issue, couldn't upload his torrent by himself because some "helping hands" jumped on his torrent in its initial phase.
That's why I would like Brandon's great sentences (quoted at the beginning of this message) become a rule in this site, then only "jump-on" members will understand, after being PM, that they're doing something wrong.
Peace :hug:
-
-
I can see there is more serious reading to do here.
So I'm slightly embarrassed to post this. But.To add to the richness of the debate.
What is worse than a jump-on seeder?
Answer: A duplicate seeder.I posted a torrent two days ago. It was popuplar. Then interest died. C'est la vie.
I posted its follow up today.
Doing the obligatory search I found the first had been duplicated.Of course mistakes happen, and I'm lucky that I'm not in desperate need of the bandwidth and points that duplicate took.
( That's 122 seed points, taking their gifted total to over 18,300 - that isn't a typo - and 1.83 GB of upload bandwidth, if you're interested )Just food for thought and too tempting not to share with you. :hug:
-
-
…
The main problem is that the vast majority of members don't, or can't, visit the Forum _..
…Well - if you had used our help desk (or our chat) to ask that question - my reply template is the same since 2008 (when I was promoted to admin) and used thousands of times in the meantime.
Sometimes I ask myself: how the f*** are users able to direct a simple support question (which btw can easily be answered when that users read the low-ratio warning they got) directly to an admin (in spite of the warning to don't do so) but are not able to ask why a menu item does not work for them???_
-
@mgr:
Sometimes I ask myself: how the f*** are users able to direct a simple support question (which btw can easily be answered when that users read the low-ratio warning they got) directly to an admin (in spite of the warning to don't do so) but are not able to ask why a menu item does not work for them???
It's a lost case mgr - a question that can't be answered (if maintaining the polite side of human nature :))
-
@mgr:
Sometimes I ask myself: how the f*** are users able to direct a simple support question (which btw can easily be answered when that users read the low-ratio warning they got) directly to an admin (in spite of the warning to don't do so) but are not able to ask why a menu item does not work for them???
It's a lost case mgr - a question that can't be answered (if maintaining the polite side of human nature :))
It is a rather interesting subject to how humanity is both doomed by its own stupidity and fundamentally insane. After all, we drum up ways of justifying the slaughter of the masses. Why do you think we invented politics and religion? :rotfl:
-
Because we had nothing better else to do
[off-topic]Message sent via an an Android powered phone and I just realized I can't use the quote option. Anyone else having the same issue?[/off-topic]
-
EDIT: Forgot the don't quote in full thingy
@geographer:The answer is really quite simple..
I, like the vast majority of members, am in the habit of clicking “Browse” from the “Home Page” to get straight to the pr0n &, normally, have no interest in reading the “Forum” [see below].. or read the “Toolbar” beyond “Browse”.... Which is why [IMO & to get back on topic] it would be more friendly / helpful / effective for blackdid to add a jpg similar to the attached [note typo] in his torrent post where even idiots, like myself, would have to see it.. Surely it's better to educate, in a place it will be seen, & thereby avoid the rule break, rather that punish after the event..
The average “user” will only try to get help when he can't get his daily fix of Pr0n..
or, as in my case, wants to ask a question once every 3 years.. & do it in the wrong way through ignorance or apathy..When the site first started & the membership was much smaller mods etc were more accepting of members mistakes & the forum was more relaxed & inviting.. Now that the membership is high the mods, understandably, can not spare the time to diplomatically explain for the 400th time an obvious solution to a problem.. The forum is a much more “shoot from the hip” / “say it as it is” / “take it or leave it” sort of place..
The fun & entertainment for both the mods & members has mostly gone on ALL Forum sites as members now “tweet” & “face book” amongst themselves.. Even the .org “shoutbox” is drying up..
Forums & shoutboxes , ircs etc are now mainly a place for just “preaching to the converted” or “brown nosing” to the mods & admins..PS.. @ mgr: I actually considered PMing you on the .org site about my problem accessing the Forum here.. but decided it might not be a good idea to disturb your few minutes of “down time” over there with my problem here.. & I'm sooooo glad I didn't.. & THANKS to the mod & the ex-mod who both PMed me “there” with the advise:
“This problem sometimes occurs with MSIE. Close all Internet Explorer windows and open Internet Options in the control panel. Click the Delete Cookies button. You should now be able to login.”I couldn't work out how to do it in Firefox.. but I appreciate the attempts at helping.. & MEGA THANKS to rocco for his solution:
Click "Profile" on the blue bar at the top of the page
Scroll to the end of the page and change your password, then click "Submit Changes"
Log out and log back in (actually last time it happened I didn't even have to logout just submit change of password.
Now try to get to the forum using the option on the blue bar at the top of the page and it should work fine
-
Dear wombat2,
If you face issues connecting here, feel invited to PM me on the .org site. Same user name there.
Another note to your picture:
We don't have a rule against jumping-on during initial seeding, though we don't like it.The reason is very simple: We can't watch all the initial seed torrents permanently and any action against such rule breaking would be very random and therefore not fair. To install such rule, we would need our system to control such jumping on. However it must be able to distinguish between wanted jumping-on, for example re-seed or supporting older torrents. To programme such is not as easy as it may sound apparently. There may be even cases were an uploader re-upload an deleted dead torrent with the same hash other members are still running in their torrent programme and will "jump-on" without any intention. We use that on the missing torrent replacement as a wanted "feature".
To the awarness of members:
Early jumping on is only an issue here, not on public trackers or the .org site which got no minimum ratio rules.Early in this flow, it was suggested to PM the early jumper to request to stop his seeding until the initial upload phase is finished. That is the best measure to take by any member seeing his initial seed being jumped on and not liking it. Please in a friendly member.
Because of the missing rule, Staff can't do much more than sending a PM, too. In addition early jumping on needs to be followed in a close timely manner, which easy acn be missed by the non-availability of the Staff.
We have as well no technical means to stop he seeding temporary, even if we would warn an account or force a passkey change. The torrent clients know already the peers IPs and will continue to be connected between each other. Besides that, those measures are to hard for members who may even don't know that they do something not nice to other members.
-
@Uwe:
We can't watch all the initial seed torrents permanently and any action against such rule breaking would be very random and therefore not fair. To install such rule, we would need our system to control such jumping on. However it must be able to distinguish between wanted jumping-on, .
&
To the awarness of members:
Early jumping on is only an issue here, not on public trackers or the .org site which got no minimum ratio rules.MEGA THANKS for the explanation Uwe.. Finally I understand..
& You are right.. I keep thinking it's the "good old days" when I posted on all 3 sites & wanted "jumpers on" to help seed.. [ie: "This is the version posted yesterday at "the other place".. If you got it from there please help seed it here"].. I need to change my mind set..
-
This is happening to me again at http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=98520.
I have PM'd the user, explained the situation and asked them to stop. I also provided him a link to this thread. Currently there are no mods online, so I think I've PM'd cumeaternc per his request above.
Since this is at least the third time this has happened in the six weeks since I joined, I guess I will start shaving off a few frames from my initial uploads to alter the hash. A bit of a pain, but problem solved (I think). :cool2:
-
I've given as well a PM, but since he isn't online, it may not help. At least he will hopefully understand why the early jump-on can be not desired for the future.
(NB.: Edited the user ID out of the claim)
-
I guess I will start shaving off a few frames from my initial uploads to alter the hash. A bit of a pain, but problem solved (I think). :cool2:
For an avi. the only way of being 100% certain is to re-format or convert with a program such as "TMPGEnc" [ie change the dimensions or the video bit rate or the output format] but it would take my comp' about 6 hours to convert your example above.. [It is my understanding that fully working "very extended trial period" versions of TMPGEnc are avaiable on sites like TPB [torrents] & katz.cd [HotFile etc] if you are comfortable getting & installing]..
For wmvs you could try simply changing the format to .asf [for XP.. go to the folder holding the movie & click> Tools > Folder Options > View > empty the box Hide Extension for Known File Types > click Apply.. You should then see the .wmv after the Title.. Click the title once.. after a second click a second time.. move the cursor to after the v in wmv click & backspce out the .wmv & then type .asf
Repeat > Tools to >View & fill the Hide Ext box > Apply..
[NOTE: I have written the previous in a way that I would want something explained.. I'm not suggesting that YOU are unknowledged.. just showing that I am in need of the step by step method]..Even though .asf will play on WMP or any other player.. Your torrent client should see it as a different file type & a hash check by the jumper will show 0%.. ie he can't jump on unless he does the above too..
-
This is happening to me again at http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=98520.
I have PM'd the user, explained the situation and asked them to stop. I also provided him a link to this thread. Currently there are no mods online, so I think I've PM'd cumeaternc per his request above.
Since this is at least the third time this has happened in the six weeks since I joined, I guess I will start shaving off a few frames from my initial uploads to alter the hash. A bit of a pain, but problem solved (I think). :cool2:
The other way you can get around this problem is by adding a few pictures or something to the torrent to make sure that the original hash that someone else is using won't match yours. The only thing they'll be able to even come close to "seeding" is the video file, which will make them show up on the tracker, rather than a leecher.
-
Sorry, two objections:
a) any re-encoding will reduce the picture and sound quality. Better for AVI is to use VirtualDub with the stream copy option to cut off a few frames (though I don't even like that crunching)
b) it is not a question of hash, jump-oners can just take the torrent from here, deselect the files they don't got and point the download to the file the movie file they've got. If it had been re-named, it doesn't matter. In addition, as they got only let's say 98.7% of all the torrent's files, they will show up as leecher (though seeding only) and be more difficult to identify as early jump -oners. Even if that process may not be mastered, they might just download the additional pictures (1.3% in my example) to seed the rest.
Another thought: Jumping on is only possible to files which have been shared elsewhere already. uploading torrents for own genuine movie versions makes jumping on impossible.
-
This is happening to me again at http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=98520&dllist=1#seeders
I have PM'd the user, explained the situation and asked them to stop. I also provided him a link to this thread.
I was just about to post this link… instead, I changed the link above to show the seeders.
As I write this, the jumper has upped their security to make them show up as Anonymous, leaving them as uncontactable, unprofileable, and unknowable, unless you start the torrent and grab their IP from your client.
Also, the jumper has uploaded over 100GB !, compared to Joe's 0.672 GB. The jumper is getting over 150 times as much credit as the actual uploader! I'd say that's a little extreme.
While I really want this, I'm going to wait until there are complete copies out there, so I don't give the pondscum any more credit, even though it will harm my own ratio.
The only programmatic solution that I can think of that might help a bit is to only give seed credit to the original uploader, by uploader name, until there is at least one full copy out there. Of course, the jumper could selectively download a single small file from the torrent (if there are more than one files in it), and after they have been listed as "finished", then open the sluice gates and dump the whole thing up. Given that, I'd suggest perhaps making it at least two copies.
