Pepsi cucks to BLM
-
What are you, ten years old? Wow, how terrible, a stupid ad got pulled because it implied Pepsi could fix the long-standing racial disparities that remain in America. A gay man babbling about SJWs is just the saddest thing I've ever seen – many of us are only alive today because WE ARE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS, and when discrimination and the AIDS epidemic hit back, we didn't sit around pissing our pants and whining about 'cucks', we fought back.
You proved me right, most gays demand a hive mind.
Modern SJWs are fighting for bullshit, not justified causes. It's like the recent discussion I had here with another user about feminism. He had no idea about anything, just the misinformation he was told by feminists. He clearly never looked up anything for himself, because anything I brought up he could only respond with "I haven't hear about that" or similar. Everything was justified by screaming "the patriarchy".
BLM doesn't care about innocent black lives, they only care about thugs. They too refuse to admit that blacks play an integral part in the issue they are complaining about. When you compare crime stats against police shootings, blacks are actually shot far less than you would expect. BLM screams that official stats are racist.
Nobody seriously thought/thinks that Pepsi can solve the world's ills. BLM just needed another thing to whine about.
I have to address something you bring up a lot… This gay hive mind thing you made up - it is not some great drama, it is simply that a lot of gay men share certain values/morals/beliefs/opinions - most gay men share the opinion that murder is wrong - is that a conspiracy against murderers? No it is simply our values/morals/beliefs/opinions that happen to coincide re : murder. Most gay men share certain experiences, no matter our lives that coincide with shaping beliefs etc
Just because, as an example, a lot of posters believe a certain thing doesn't mean we are all brainwashed by a hive mind it simply means we are the majority in certain beliefs.
-
If we aren't all part of the gay borg collective, then we deemed evil by our fellow fags.
I don't cuck to BLM, so I'm a racist.
I don't cuck to feminism, so I hate women.
I pointed out 2 proven lies by a Congressman, so I'm a racist.
It's always the same shit with SJWs.
If you disagree with setting a building on fire with people in it to prevent "wrong think", then you are a hate monger.
If you disagree with beating the shit out of people who you "think" might disagree with the fag collective, then you are evil.
If you claim that wearing boys' underwear doesn't make you trans, then you are evil.
If you don't believe a woman is gender fluid because she occasionally wears jeans, then you are evil.
If you say that being a cross dresser does not make you transsexual, you are a transphobe.
Saying that Elliot Cope isn't trans because she is not, makes you a transphobe.
Modern SJWs don't fight for anything real, they just want something to whine about to make them feel special.
Let's not for get how SJWs, especially black SJWs, treat blacks who disagree with their bullshit. Non-SJW blacks are called white washed, coons, house niggers, chimps, and many other things.
-
I pay them no mind.. in anything in life there are extremists.. the right side of politics has it too.. as i've said b4 - these bullshit extreme sides are loud but definitely a minority
but to clarify.. im not am extreme SJW (the kind you describe) and that Pepsi ad reaction, i believe, was justified
My issue with a lot of people that express themselves, the way you are, (not pointing at you directly btw) is that I fee'l like if i even slightly agree with BLM or whatever group we are discussing I am auto labelled an SJW and suddenly am this extremist, that shits me - just remember the majority is in the centre or worse - they don't care at all
-
Who said I am white?
You did, with every single word you write.
More blatant racism. And by the way, I agree with Jbo1, and I'm also not white. NOT THAT IT SHOULD EVEN MATTER!!!!
Honestly, I just feel the need to speak out. The level of discourse here is so low, because of people like you playing the identity politics game to suggest that the color of someone's skin has any effect at all on the validity of their words. Disgusting.
Honestly, the racism you've showed, it makes me physically ill. It's really disgusting, just like every other form of racism.
-
None of my black friends like BLM. They freak out whenever people assume that because they are black that they agree with BLM.
I agree that it is racist to think that blacks automatically support BLM.
-
Please, someone, take down this bullshit thread. The Pepsi ad sucked and it was removed. Deal with it people!!!
-
I didn't realize racism was abundant on Gaytorrent. Oh well, I'd suggest mods close or lock the thread.
-
Who said I am white?
You did, with every single word you write.
More blatant racism. And by the way, I agree with Jbo1, and I'm also not white. NOT THAT IT SHOULD EVEN MATTER!!!!
Honestly, I just feel the need to speak out. The level of discourse here is so low, because of people like you playing the identity politics game to suggest that the color of someone's skin has any effect at all on the validity of their words. Disgusting.
Honestly, the racism you've showed, it makes me physically ill. It's really disgusting, just like every other form of racism.
Personally I do not care about skin colour.. how people treat others is how I look at people… That is why I sometimes get angry with threads like this where it just seems to get in to tangents that involve people attacking each other personally
"The level of discourse here is so low"
I agree entirely but please look at at it from a whole.. it is not just low just because you perceive racism.. it is also low because of how people are talking to each eachother and the emotion they put in each word - some on here just wanna see people get triggered and laugh at them - kinda sad really but hey, that is what happens, esp in political debate, on the net
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
The same can be said for your side.
Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think". You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.
Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.
It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.
It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.
It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.
It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.
It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.
It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
The same can be said for your side.
Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think". You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.
Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.
It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.
It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.
It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.
It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.
It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.
It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
"It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism. "
no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok? you ok with that? Because it sounds like to me you are pointing to 1 off or minority things, that are bad but are done by silly extremists.. i'm sorry but both sides have stories like this they could tell all day
e.g.
"It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened"
but what of the vast majority that DID happen? Are they ok? no, they are not. Who did those ? Who knows?
look at both sides - there are extreme 1 off things on both sides..
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
The same can be said for your side.
Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think". You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.
Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.
It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.
It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.
It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.
It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.
It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.
It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
Gay men/women get bashed and/or killed by right wing fanatics every freaking day and your big argument is "we" are pouring urine on a reporter's head
-
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
The first mistake was assuming that I'm on some side, thus every dot point you wrote is pointless. Why choose a side and participate in narrow-minded groupthink? But to answer your question, both sides have become hypersensitive, but one side is whiny and self-righteous while the other is evil.
I remember how right-wingers would use singular examples such as gay serial killer Andrew Cunanan to dismiss the whole gay population. Or by using AID statistics to prove how one minority group is inherently worse. I find it sad that gays are also prone to the same mental gymnastics.
-
Actually do your research on domestic violence. From your response, you're in for a big shock. Don't just look to your gender studies aka feminist indoctrination professor to tell you the stats.
Your previous post shows that you chose a side, that of the SJWs, by only attacking the side you labeled "evil".
Just like with my recent discussion about feminsm, you guys ignore the crap your side is doing and crying about mythical things to defend your position. At least the guy in that discussion admitted that feminists are selfish cunts, even though he quickly back peddled.
A lot of the gay bashing that's made headline news seems to have been false flags, just like countless others. Even the SJW main news outlet TYT says false flagging is always wrong, but then they go on to defend the false flaggers.
Cank from TYT is a "just believer", but he's an Armenian genocide denier because it makes his people look bad.
-
Gay bashing is mostly false flags?
Really? Read what you just wrote.. you said that most gay men that get bashed are lying and it is not a hate crime - or they "seem" to be lying - why? because if they aren't you have to face some harsh reality about "your" side ?
That is pure generalising and now I get where you are coming from re : politics and sides etc - thanks for the enlightenment
You assume anything said to be a hate crime is false and they must have somehow done something to get hurt.. hate to break it to you but most hate crime occurs simply because they exist and you just belittled them and basically said they were lying as to why they got bashed/hurt?
You do not believe "your side" has any flaws so put the blame on victims and because a very small minority you hear about that are false flags we must ALL be lying
In my book that is called enabling - you are basically taking the responsibility off the actual perpetrator and putting it on the victim
-
As for domestic violence.. there is no justification for it EVER - and that's it. Thousands of people around the world are victims… but you want me to "research" stuff that then would justify your enabling of the domestic violence ? nah.. i'll pass.. i would rather be seen as a person who opposes it and wants to actually stop it, instead of not facing up to the fact that it occurs and and justifying with skewed research that makes the perpetrators feel justified in their actions
-
As for domestic violence.. there is no justification for it EVER - and that's it. Thousands of people around the world are victims… but you want me to "research" stuff that then would justify your enabling of the domestic violence ? nah.. i'll pass.. i would rather be seen as a person who opposes it and wants to actually stop it, instead of not facing up to the fact that it occurs and and justifying with skewed research that makes the perpetrators feel justified in their actions
I wouldn't go that far. I knew a child many years ago that picked a tiny dog up by one leg, breaking it, and laughed for several minutes. The same child had a passion for breaking all sorts of things, and knocking things off the shelves in stores. She was a hellion, and still is but in a different way. When someone is being destructive, a swat on the ass works wonders… but should be a last resort. I see many children getting smacked around for no reason other than for the parent to show whose boss.
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
The same can be said for your side.
Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think". You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.
Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.
It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.
It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.
It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.
It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.
It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.
It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
Before DNA testing was readily available and accurate, 10% of the men who pled guilty to rape were later found to be not-guilty when DNA testing was done years later. They pled guilty in plea bargains to avoid severe prison sentences. I wonder how many "rapes" were consensual sex at the time, but later resulted in a rape complaint out of revenge. Most people have the idea that law enforcement exists to punish the guilty.. That is not true. The purpose for law enforcement is to protect the innocent. Far too many cops take it upon themselves to mete out their own punishments. There is something else that needs to be said about that. Often, there will be a story posted on the internet about gross police brutality and abuse of their powers. If one dares criticize the police online, one takes a big risk of having their accounts terminated. I had TWO Facebook accounts nuked because I criticized the police. Because of that, people don't complain so much. The complainers are silenced. I feel hypocritical, but I no longer comment in public forums about wrongdoings. I also lost another facebook account and a youtube account for pointing out how corrupt and evil Slippery Hillary is.
-
As for domestic violence.. there is no justification for it EVER - and that's it. Thousands of people around the world are victims… but you want me to "research" stuff that then would justify your enabling of the domestic violence ? nah.. i'll pass.. i would rather be seen as a person who opposes it and wants to actually stop it, instead of not facing up to the fact that it occurs and and justifying with skewed research that makes the perpetrators feel justified in their actions
I wouldn't go that far. I knew a child many years ago that picked a tiny dog up by one leg, breaking it, and laughed for several minutes. The same child had a passion for breaking all sorts of things, and knocking things off the shelves in stores. She was a hellion, and still is but in a different way. When someone is being destructive, a swat on the ass works wonders… but should be a last resort. I see many children getting smacked around for no reason other than for the parent to show whose boss.
ok.. well in my mind swatting a child's butt for an indiscretion of behaviour etc - once in a blue moon - is not exactly "domestic violence" but I was strong in my language, so I get ya
the last line you wrote is more my thinking - the power play of 1 spouse to another and/or to their children is where the line blurs and becomes a mess
-
How am I enabling domestic violence?!
Telling you to do your research DOES NOT enable domestic violence. You making domestic violence a gendered issue is what enables women to abuse their partners; male or female. This shows everyone that you are a self loathing feminist/vaginalist cuck. 70% of one sided domestic violence is by women, not men.
I fucking hate domestic violence with a passion. How fucking dare you tell me I enable it by telling you to look at the facts.
++++
There's a long list of false flag hate crimes, even before trump.
In Charlotte, we had a White Supremacy hate crime incident. Oh wait, it was a black guy who did the hate crime.
We had 2 cases of head scarf hate crimes, but they turned out to be lies by the girls.
We had the muslim woman whose car was grafittied. Oh wait, she did that herself and was caught on CCTV.
It was a black member of the church that set it on fire.
Let's not forget all the rape cases.
Tawana Brawley and her mother was 30 years ago and fake hate crimes, for whatever purpose, have exploded.
Here's a site that lists 298 fake hate crimes in the US, but they admit it's no where near all of them; http://www.fakehatecrimes.org In fact, #298 is the Charlotte case mentioned above.
I was the victim of a hate crime 25 years ago. These scum that you are excusing makes a mockery of what I and other real victims went through.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login