Should I post my collection of posts that give liberals nightmares?
-
Grevmo, nobody cares that you're a "debate judge". On the internet, a wise man once said, everyone is equal behind the keyboard. For example, I could bring up that I have a PhD in statistics, but I don't because it's irrelevant.
The fact that you keep clinging on to your meaningless claim as a means of presenting yourself as an authority shows how little you actually understand about how debate on the internet actually works and also how empty your platitudes on fact vs. opinion really are.
I strongly disapprove that he called a Syrian government ally to affirm his action before he took it, and that his so-called attack was as impotent as a 110-year-old man who's never heard of Viagra.
You'd risk war with Russia just because you'd like to think of America as Team America, World Police punishing evil doers across the globe? South Park parodied this for a reason, and that's because the idea that we have the moral authority to mete out punishment, consequences be damned, anywhere on the globe at any time – that idea is flat out retarded. It's not just retarded, it's insane. America is done playing the world police, despite what you neocon warmongers would like. As a country, we simply do not have the resources or moral authority to play that role.
-
deleted
-
The topic was "Should I post my collection of posts that give liberals nightmares?"
So far, all you have done is give us nightmares that anyone would be stupid enough to believe the crap you do.
-
Grevmo, nobody cares that you're a "debate judge". On the internet, a wise man once said, everyone is equal behind the keyboard. For example, I could bring up that I have a PhD in statistics, but I don't because it's irrelevant.
The fact that you keep clinging on to your meaningless claim as a means of presenting yourself as an authority shows how little you actually understand about how debate on the internet actually works and also how empty your platitudes on fact vs. opinion really are.
I've been an internet user since CARL was actually a series of libraries exclusively in Colorado. I know how it works, and I will continue to establish experience-based authority based when it is appropriate to do so. For example, if you were sharing statistics, then your PhD would have value for citation, and I would respect what you have to say more in that field. But in this case, you're just piling things higher and deeper, so citing your doctorate has no real-world value. Ironically, whereas I cited my experience because it was germane to the topic, you cited yours to be a bully.
I strongly disapprove that he called a Syrian government ally to affirm his action before he took it, and that his so-called attack was as impotent as a 110-year-old man who's never heard of Viagra.
You'd risk war with Russia just because you'd like to think of America as Team America, World Police punishing evil doers across the globe? South Park parodied this for a reason, and that's because the idea that we have the moral authority to mete out punishment, consequences be damned, anywhere on the globe at any time – that idea is flat out retarded. It's not just retarded, it's insane. America is done playing the world police, despite what you neocon warmongers would like. As a country, we simply do not have the resources or moral authority to play that role.
No, but I believe that it is our responsibility to clean up our messes. Daesh exists because we created it, and is now terrorizing people around the world, but most especially in the Middle East. The civil war in Syria is not our business, per se, but Assad's use of chemical weapons is; he wouldn't have those weapons if we hadn't forced them out of Iraq. Saddam Hussein sent Assad those missiles in the eleventh hour before Dubya's deadline, in a too-little-too-late gesture to keep Bush from invading.
As for Trump's actions, there's such a thing as operational security, and Trump seems to understand it about as poorly as Obama.
-
I've been an internet user since CARL was actually a series of libraries exclusively in Colorado. I know how it works, and I will continue to establish experience-based authority based when it is appropriate to do so.
Your degree in "debate judging" is absolutely irrelevant to the topic at hand. You being a "debate judge" has less than zero bearing on your claim that Frederick's substitutes opinion for fact. In fact, it makes your claim look weak as fuck, because it's a blatant and classic appeal to authority fallacy. Surely as a "debate judge" you should know that.
For example, if you were sharing statistics, then your PhD would have value for citation, and I would respect what you have to say more in that field.
Then you'd be a fool. Anyone on the internet can claim to have a PhD. I mean, I do, but you have no way of knowing that I'm telling the truth. That is why credentials are completely irrelevant doubly so on the internet, even more than they already are in real life. Accept an argument because it makes sense, not because someone claims to be an expert on it.
Ironically, whereas I cited my experience because it was germane to the topic, you cited yours to be a bully.
lol you must really be new to the internet.
No, but I believe that it is our responsibility to clean up our messes. Daesh exists because we created it, and is now terrorizing people around the world, but most especially in the Middle East. The civil war in Syria is not our business, per se, but Assad's use of chemical weapons is; he wouldn't have those weapons if we hadn't forced them out of Iraq. Saddam Hussein sent Assad those missiles in the eleventh hour before Dubya's deadline, in a too-little-too-late gesture to keep Bush from invading.
Even if I were to accept the argument the Assad wouldn't have chemical weapons if not for the U.S., this is almost completely irrelevant to your earlier statement about not informing Russia of the attack. You talk about national responsibility, yet in just the previous breath, lambast Trump for not purposely provoking Russia? Russia is not our enemy, and unlike the U.S., did not create and support ISIS as you noted. There is no good reason for the U.S. to antagonize Russia.
-
Your degree in "debate judging" is absolutely irrelevant to the topic at hand. You being a "debate judge" has less than zero bearing on your claim that Frederick's substitutes opinion for fact. In fact, it makes your claim look weak as fuck, because it's a blatant and classic appeal to authority fallacy. Surely as a "debate judge" you should know that.
- I haven't claimed to have a degree in anything. My degrees are not germane to the topic, so I haven't discussed them.
- The fallacy is "appeal to inappropriate authority, like quoting Carl Sagan in his discussions on theology, when he was an astrophysicist, or claiming to understand how debate works, when your degree is in statistics.
Then you'd be a fool. Anyone on the internet can claim to have a PhD. I mean, I do, but you have no way of knowing that I'm telling the truth. That is why credentials are completely irrelevant doubly so on the internet, even more than they already are in real life. Accept an argument because it makes sense, not because someone claims to be an expert on it.
I prefer to go by the maxim, "trust, but verify." And which of us are you calling the liar? Me, in which case you're committing an ad hominem fallacy, or yourself, in which case, there's no further value in discussing this with you.
lol you must really be new to the internet.
More ad hominem attacks? Nope, there is no further value in discussing anything with you, as all you're going to do is troll. Good day.
