LGBT Voters Favor Clinton Over Trump by Wide Margin: POLL
-
Actually, it's a direct and acurate response to you and your fellow SJWs.
No, it's not, bumper sticker. Here's how discussion works. I say something to you, then you say something back related to the context of my initial statement. So when you go off on one of your little copy and paste tangents, it's not a response to me.
You hate anyone who disagrees with you. You claim that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot who can only parrot the right wing. You keep ignoring the act that your side does nothing but name call. You never produce any evidence to back up your claims.
Sort of like how you can only produce pre-manufactured statements that you hope will be relevant to the conversation that is happening around you? When you are litterally copying things, then saying "parrot" is pretty accurate.
AGAIN, if you people really think what you are doing is so good, then why do you need to hide your faces?! Why do you need to assault the media who is covering what you are doing in a public space?!
And this is the perfect example of exactly what I was talking about (in fact, I noticed it earlier, but felt the sheer hypocrisy of someone in the LGBT community being anti-rioting was more important to point out). Literally no one was talking about this. You brought it up out of no where, it doesn't apply to anyone here (nor to the conversation). You don't even proffer a context to make sense of it. Just an accusation hurled around, because you picked it up in the comments section on a right-wing website.
This is textbook troll behavior.
Stonewall was completely different from an election. And as you seem to ignore, the Stonewall rioters didn't cover their faces. Nor did they use "injustice" as a reason to loot.
Wow. You really are ignorant.
-
Just because you do not like my response, doesn't mean it's "copy n paste". Your attempts to discredit me and my posts is pathetic, at best.
Actually, you are a liar by claiming that my posts are "copy n paste" and you know it. Dishonesty is all your kind has. I can claim that nothing you have said is anything but a copy n paste of every other SJW on the planet.
LOL, you are so delusional. Stonewall was nothing like the crap you SJWs are doing. Stonewall wasn't a loot-fest, like we see with your kind's "protests".
If I get my info from right wing sites, then you get your info from Tumbler and MTV Decoded.
-
Trump has a horrible public image: scandals, a horrible personality…you name it. But in truth, Trump has actually profitted from this 'bad' media. Being obnoxious and rude is kinda 'his thing'. But remember that under that facade lies a shrewd businessman.
Hillary belongs to the political elite, they are taught to cover all their ugly business. But they do have, as they say 'skeletons in their closets'. Heck! I'm sure after their administration is over, someone will find out juicy bits about the Obama family members even.
None of them are perfect, but it seems that US citizens (and some of other countries as well) are letting Trump's loud and obnoxious speech distract them from Hillary's own faults.
I think the problem is the de facto binary political system that disenfranchises a lot of people. It's borderline undemocratic when two political parties (represented by awful candidates) are the only viable options to represent the diversity of views of 230 million people.
Serious? Most Americans I met online rather prefered Bernie Sanders… oh well...though I feel Hillary was an easy target too, after all, Bill smudged her due to his own scandals to some degree plus her own dirt that could be discovered.
Russian hackers? What is this?
Bernie Sanders is too left-leaning for the average American. The Democrat Party and Obama's actual governance would be considered right-of-centre in Canada and most western European countries. Demographics, culture and media propaganda have left no room for Sanders' type of policies to become mainstream in the U.S.
-
Actually, it's a direct and acurate response to you and your fellow SJWs.
No, it's not, bumper sticker. Here's how discussion works. I say something to you, then you say something back related to the context of my initial statement. So when you go off on one of your little copy and paste tangents, it's not a response to me.
You hate anyone who disagrees with you. You claim that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot who can only parrot the right wing. You keep ignoring the act that your side does nothing but name call. You never produce any evidence to back up your claims.
Sort of like how you can only produce pre-manufactured statements that you hope will be relevant to the conversation that is happening around you? When you are litterally copying things, then saying "parrot" is pretty accurate.
AGAIN, if you people really think what you are doing is so good, then why do you need to hide your faces?! Why do you need to assault the media who is covering what you are doing in a public space?!
And this is the perfect example of exactly what I was talking about (in fact, I noticed it earlier, but felt the sheer hypocrisy of someone in the LGBT community being anti-rioting was more important to point out). Literally no one was talking about this. You brought it up out of no where, it doesn't apply to anyone here (nor to the conversation). You don't even proffer a context to make sense of it. Just an accusation hurled around, because you picked it up in the comments section on a right-wing website.
This is textbook troll behavior.
Stonewall was completely different from an election. And as you seem to ignore, the Stonewall rioters didn't cover their faces. Nor did they use "injustice" as a reason to loot.
Wow. You really are ignorant.
stop proving your opponent right.
-
AGAIN, if you people really think what you are doing is so good, then why do you need to hide your faces?! Why do you need to assault the media who is covering what you are doing in a public space?!
And this is the perfect example of exactly what I was talking about (in fact, I noticed it earlier, but felt the sheer hypocrisy of someone in the LGBT community being anti-rioting was more important to point out). Literally no one was talking about this. You brought it up out of no where, it doesn't apply to anyone here (nor to the conversation). You don't even proffer a context to make sense of it. Just an accusation hurled around, because you picked it up in the comments section on a right-wing website.
This is textbook troll behavior.
Stonewall was completely different from an election. And as you seem to ignore, the Stonewall rioters didn't cover their faces. Nor did they use "injustice" as a reason to loot.
Wow. You really are ignorant.
Just because you weren't talking about it doesn't mean it can't be talked about or that it has no relavence on this topic.
It does fit here because they are SJWs just like you. You guys claim you are the good guys yet you need to cover your faces, while looting in the name of injustice.
There are countless videos on the internet to show exactly what I'm talking about.
If you want to talk about "ignorance", then we need to talk about SJWs who can't provide any evidence to support their claims and just name call or physically abuse people, like pouring a bottle of piss on a reporter's head and then running away.
