Straight guys are the best to sleep with
-
Straight guys are the best in bed because they release all that tension. Gay guys are always doing it so there's less frustration.
-
You seem to be under the impression that straight guys get less sex then gay guys…? I don't necessarily think that is the case at all. But if the guy is truly straight and is having sex with a gay guy, then I suppose it is likely the case that he is harder up... or else he'd be sleeping with a woman (if that is his orientation.) So then you get down to why is that guy not getting any... and it's my belief in something like karma... they guys who have good personalities are good lovers and get good amounts of sex... so if some guy is not getting a good amount of sex he's probably not a great person or great at it...
-
I didn't say that they were not "getting any" as you say, but that they had sexual tension. There exists many categories. MSM is a category for men who sleep with men and usually do not have a romantic attraction to men. They are more likely to have an emotional bond. They do not care about orientation.
http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/msm/en/
If you are going to include asexual and transgender as orientations, which to me seems impossible because by definition asexual means sex with oneself producing offspring by binary fission, then why not this one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction -
So, you went on Wikipedia but did not notice this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality
I have a hard time believing that. If you are not aware that some people are asexual/graysexual(having little to no sexual attraction or interest; maybe also including those with a low sexual libido), OK but don't use the genetic fallacy or disrespect asexual people. Words can have more than one meaning. Look at the word gay, for instance. It has two common meanings (attracted exclusively to the same sex and happy) as well as some archaic and obsolete meanings. The same with battery, fluke and many other homonyms.
-
It is not about them having more than one meaning, it is about using words incorrectly.
Biology.
having no sex or sexual organs.
independent of sexual processes, especially not involving the union of male and female germ cells.If they are not having any sex maybe we should just call them celibates. Also if one has no interest and then gains an interest later then they have changed their orientation then. Celibacy is a choice not an orientation.
-
Words can have more than one meaning. Look at the word gay, for instance. It has two common meanings (attracted exclusively to the same sex and happy) as well as some archaic and obsolete meanings. The same with battery, fluke and many other homonyms.
P.S. neither fluke nor battery are homonyms. Homonyms are being used too broadly to include homographs and homophones. Spelling the same and sounding the same, respectively. Example tear (from the eye) and tear (rip something). Gay is not a homonym.
http://www.cooper.com/alan/homonym_list.html -
I was 100% correct. All homonyms are by definition homographs(same spelling) and homophones(same sounds) because they are words that are spelled and pronounced like another word but are different in meaning. [ [b]Note: not all homographs are homonyms, e.g. heteronyms, and likewise with homophones] Gay, fluke and battery are homonyms because they are both homographs and homophones. That link you provided is a list of homophones. The guy himself admits that he labeled the list incorrectly due to a bad habit.
Look under the "Nomenclature" section:
http://www.cooper.com/alan/homonym.htmlI'd like to point out that the word "homonym" is actually a misnomer. I learned this only recently from my son, and by rights I should call this a list of homophones, but old habits die hard, and that smudged, yellow, lined pad didn't say "homophones," it said "homonyms," and that's how I think of them.
Don't make the same mistakes this guy does because his teacher was confused.
Back to asexuality, asexual has a meaning in biology and a separate meaning in sexology. Just like bat in zoology and bat in baseball mean different things or dissolve in film-making versus dissolve in chemistry.
-
suit yourself :cheers:
-
I'm not sure how scientifically and statistically accurate it's your statement, but according to my experience, you're right. In my experience with "straight" men, (those who, have sex with men occasionally but they prefer women ) I've had the best sex in my life. I used to have a straight friend who always used to look for me, for giving me the best fuck I've ever experienced, he was really rude, dominant and vigorous, and when he came, it was a force of nature, he was magnificent, the best top I've ever been with. Other one used to give me the best deep throat fucking with his cock, and his orgasm were really intense and loud, and his cum really abundant, I think it was because they didn't use to have sex very often. I don't know if straight men tend to be more celibate that gay men, but, somehow you're right.
-
Men who have sex with other men are NOT straight. You're not turning straight men gay with your special powers. Stop fooling yourself.::)
-
Men who have sex with other men are NOT straight. You're not turning straight men gay with your special powers. Stop fooling yourself.::)
THIS^
Resolution for 2015, stop this straight guy worshipping bullshit. -
Resolution for 2015, stop this straight guy worshipping bullshit.
:true: :thankyou: :bravo:
Generalizations so many in such a little time, straight guys first would not likely top you and if they did… THEY´D BE PROBABLY TERRIBLE AT IT. Might I point that most would not have been penetrated so they do not know how butt fucking even works? Yeah if you are experienced and can handle harsh fucking it might turn pleasureable but that's YOU doing all the work, for most well they think it's a vagina so just shove it in right? They do not know exactly where the pleasure spot in men is probably... I'd take all of that with a pinch of salt.
-
Resolution for 2015, stop this straight guy worshipping bullshit.
:true: :thankyou: :bravo:
Generalizations so many in such a little time, straight guys first would not likely top you and if they did… THEY´D BE PROBABLY TERRIBLE AT IT. Might I point that most would not have been penetrated so they do not know how butt fucking even works? Yeah if you are experienced and can handle harsh fucking it might turn pleasureable but that's YOU doing all the work, for most well they think it's a vagina so just shove it in right? They do not know exactly where the pleasure spot in men is probably... I'd take all of that with a pinch of salt.
Speak for yourself. You sound like a straight hater. All the same, more for everyone else. Sexual orientation is not just defined by who you sleep with. :pope: :cheerup:
-
Sexual orientation is not just defined by who you sleep with.
Keep telling yourself that if it helps you :cheerup:
-
No one said that it was helpful, just really enjoyable. Keep telling yourself that you know better. :cheerup: :angel2:
-
Men who have sex with other men are NOT straight. You're not turning straight men gay with your special powers. Stop fooling yourself.::)
THIS^
Resolution for 2015, stop this straight guy worshipping bullshit.Cannot agree with this more. The whole straight worshipping makes people think that theyre somehow more attractive and better in bed. When most of the "straight" guys i've had have been horrible…..
-
I am sorry that you have had such a terrible experience with them. :cry2: :cry2: Mine has been awesome. :cheers:
-
i think that the straight guys when had sex with a gay performing better because it's the one and only experience and are very aroused by that.
-
Just once i had a sex with a str8 guy (for who I know that he's str8), my old schoolmate, on a anniversary of our generation, he was a little bit drunk and a little bit confused but he done job pretty good >:D
-
As an older man, I look back to my youth in the closeted, uptite, pre-Stonewall days when I did not know anyone who was gay (that is, if anyone around me was gay, I did not know it) and had no gay role models, any sex I had with men was with str8s. As a Navy friend was told by the first man to suck him off, "it's just a blow job." Not all men freak out or have an identity crisis over getting their rocks off as needed– hence glory holes at truckstops. Men (and women, for that matter) find ways to accommodate their sexual needs, period. That does not require labels or stereotypes, just an active libido and the courage to satisfy it.
That said, some sexually active men might be curious whether a gay men gives head better than a woman or otherwise be curious about purely sensual "depravity," whether that involves a threesome with two women, another man and woman, or just some available deep throat, they may enjoy having a partner who does not think it is gross to suck a dick, does not think semen is icky or indigestible, and who might even welcome a good pounding.
I used to think strait men were pussy-oriented, but apparently some women like butt sex a lot, so as men become comfortable with doing that, they may figure "a butt is a butt" and, as Woody Allen said in a related context, double their chances of a date on Saturday night. To the extent that men are more rugged than women, it might well be rewarding for a str8 man to be able to fuck with full force and power, rather than have to modulate his breeding tor a more tender partner. And, esp. as men like getting sucked off and women often do not like to provide oral rather than receive it, the mouth most likely for them to feed does belong to a gay man.
Yes, I notice implied stereotypes in the above, and hasten to add that all these generalizations apply, at best, across a broad sample and not to any individual. Similarly, youthful experimentation-- Scouts discovering how to start a fire by rubbing two sticks together, drunken fratboys and other students, perhaps jocks and anyone else secure enough in their self-image that they would rather get laid than panic-- is not the same thing as a husband who has an arrangement with a gay neighbor, or some guy who has discovered the advantages of visiting an Adult Bookstore from time to time.
There are even str8s on Craigslist in the U.S. and on gay dating sites. One man in search of a blowjob told me, "I don't care what you look like; I'm straight." In fact, since tits and looks that matter in their choice of female partners are not relevant to their choice of cocksucker, the "attractiveness" of the relief giver is irrelevant. Everyone thus has an equal chance to slake the needs of such a stud at the right (wrong?) time of month, as a convenient if unexpected opportunity, to satisfy curiosity, or during occasional periods of heteroscarcity (a word invented right here, right now, and recommended for your use if if turns out to fulfill the need it seems to).
As for what makes a person "straight," opinions differ, depending on how much people are committed to labels and narrow categories in defiance of human history (heavy on "any port in a storm" and "a hard prick has no conscience" and "if it moves, fuck it"), and cultural mores specific to a given place and time. Do you really think everyone was celibate during long sea voyages throughout history? Ever heard the joke where the punch line is, "It's your turn in the barrel"?
My own believe, argue with it if you will, is that people do whatever it is they do, and whatever men do is something a man does. Once there was a humorous book titled "Real Men Don't Eat Quiche." In fact, real men eat anything they want. (Wanna make something of it?)
