Fauci on 3rd covid infection, after 6 shots (4 boosters)
-
"Fauci touts vaccine boosters and masks after getting COVID-19 for the third time"
“I got infected about two weeks ago. It was my third COVID-19 infection, and I had been vaccinated and boosted a total of six times,” Fauci said
If we assume Fauci's statements are accurate
He, and Biden and countless others who get repeated infections, show these products often do not work.Studies (mentioned in older threads) show transient, diminishing, or even negative immunity from these ill-conceived covid vaxx.
If Fauci got a benefit in terms of lower symptoms: he probably got it way back, from shots 1-2 and/or his natural infection 1.
Studies (mentioned in older threads) also show, at least 1 in 800 people have SAE (Serious Adverse Events) from these ill-conceived shots. That number includes younger men who, if unlucky, may develop heart problems including sudden death.
With what we know in 2024 - For Fauci to still recommend these shots in blanket fashion - ie. no careful qualifiers, no acknowledgement that each person's medical situation is different - is immoral.
-
To be fair, it could just be the common cold, the flu, Mers, Sars, etc since the so-called "covid tests" only look for coronaviruses. This is why those things disappeared when the covid tests came out. Everyone who tested positive was just assumed to have covid. We can thank the UK's health minister, Matt Hancock, and his use of WhatsApp for that tidbit of info.
We know from his Jan and July testimonies in front of Congress this year, he pulled the covid rules out of his ass, without any scientific backing.
We also know that he, like Killary, used private email to discuss things to avoid FOIA laws.
He refused to take any blame for things he signed off on because he didn't read the stuff. He said he trusted his underlings to read it and approve it before it got to him.
-
Referenced by B blablarg18
-
Referenced by B blablarg18
-
Covid boosters weaken ur body's anti-covid response:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40113142/
https://www.malone.news/p/what-your-covid-booster-did-to-your
tldr;
-
if ur immune system sees some invader again & again, in safe context like shots, it learns to respond to that thing with its weakest antibody type, ig4
-
effect can be GOOD; it's how allergy shots work
-
but not good with viruses
-
mRNA vaxx, Pfizer & Moderna, have molecular details which weirdly magnify that effect. (Natural infections don't. "other" vaxx, A-Z or J-J or Novavax, that are not mRNA, don't.)
-
if u had 3 or more jabs, ur body has learned to make ig4 type antibodies, for covid
-
ur not doomed, but u may get more covid infections
What is documented
- Increased risk of breakthrough COVID infection
Martín Pérez et al. (2025) found that healthcare workers who developed the IgG4 shift were more likely to get COVID afterward. This is the first published study to link the antibody shift to an actual adverse health outcome. It needs replication, but the direction is predicted by the biology.
- Loss of the immune functions that clear infected cells
Kalkeri et al. (2025) directly measured the functional consequences. Higher IgG4 was correlated with reduced capacity for three distinct immune clearance mechanisms: ADCC (r = –0.53), complement deposition (r = –0.53), and phagocytosis (r = –0.40). These are not theories. They are published measurements.
- The damage is written into immune memory
Irrgang et al. (Science Immunology, 2023) found that 14.4% of the long-term immune memory cells targeting the spike protein were IgG4-producing after repeated boosting. These cells persist for years. The impairment does not fade when vaccination stops.
- Children are also affected
Kobbe et al. (Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2024) confirmed IgG4 switching in children aged 5 to 11 after only two standard pediatric doses. The effect is not limited to adults who received many boosters.
What is plausible but not yet confirmed
The following risks have not been confirmed in large studies...meaning the studies have not been done, not that the risks have been ruled out.
• IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD)...(see Malone article for more)
• Impaired cancer immune surveillance...
• Interference with cancer treatments...
• Weakened response to other vaccines and infections...
• Immunological imprinting...
• Autoantibody generation...
The most important point in this entire paper is that the same immune shift has completely different implications depending on who you are....
For people who are genuinely at high risk of severe COVID, repeated boosting is likely still the right call. COVID-19 kills primarily through excessive inflammation, not through direct viral damage. The IgG4 shift, which dampens that inflammatory response while maintaining the ability to neutralize the virus, may actually be protective for people whose biggest risk is the body’s own overreaction...
That said, even for this group, the evidence supports spacing boosters at least a year apart, considering lower doses, and possibly using a protein-subunit vaccine (like Novavax) for boosting to avoid amplifying the IgG4 shift...
For healthy adults [and children] who are not at elevated risk of severe COVID, the calculation is different. The individual risk of serious illness is very low. The benefits of additional boosters are small in absolute terms. And the adverse immune events documented here (loss of Fc clearance function, durable IgG4 memory encoding, immunological imprinting) are not offset by a commensurate benefit. Clinicians advising this group have an obligation to explain these trade-offs...
The findings for children are particularly concerning. Children face near-zero individual risk of severe COVID. The documented justification for vaccinating them rested almost entirely on reducing transmission to others. But the IgG4 shift produces an antibody profile that is poorly suited to preventing infection and transmission. And the shift occurs after only two standard pediatric doses, before any booster is even given...
[as to testing your antibody levels,] A high antibody number after multiple boosters may reflect protection. [OR, but,] It may also reflect a growing fraction of tolerance antibodies [the ig4 ones] that actively interfere with infection clearance. The test cannot tell you which.
-
