• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    Douglass Mackey case: USA criminalizes memes. Literally.

    Politics & Debate
    3
    27
    95
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      blablarg18 @hubrys last edited by blablarg18

      @hubrys No. I don't.

      You seem to mistake "care what you think", with "poke fun - while perhaps educate or encourage OTHERS a bit".

      They are different.

      All along, you've been wrong on Mackey case.

      And now a publication that, in theory, YOU should respect (but really I don't), tells you so.

      It's fun to point that out............ Whether or not you see it.

      But it does "involve you" on some level, so - it seemed courteous to notify you.

      Thus: What you call summoning was, believe it or not, done from courtesy.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        blablarg18 last edited by blablarg18

        As to Harvard's article: They ignore HUGE issues of prosecutor abuse & bias, like

        • selective prosecution (Kristina Wong not mentioned)

        • invention of non-existent conspiracy

        So it's lame. Still, nice to see yall slow-witted libs finally move a few centimetres.

        That Mackey’s primitive meme — sandwiched between thousands of his other tweets — could have fooled American voters into believing that the 2016 election allowed voting by text does indeed strain belief.

        Yes.

        The government relied on conversations Mackey had with his co­conspirators to show conspiratorial intent, but Mackey’s lawyers claimed that Mackey was never present in these conversations at all.

        Not quite. Prosecutor failed to show that Mackey was ever present.

        To show evidence, is their burden. They had NONE.

        One witness said, in effect & under government pressure, Mackey & I had -an imaginary agreement in my imagination-, to defraud voters. Big whoop.

        "Agreement" so "silent" (imaginary) that we NEVER had contact ⬅ prosecution was that bad

        USA will vote Orange in November............... ............. and this case is 1 micro example, of why.

        Lib arrogance, lib abuses, lib illegitimacy.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          blablarg18 last edited by blablarg18

          Corey Amundsen (politically-corrupt prosecutor) resigns.

          https://x.com/DougMackeyCase/status/1884035951988732276

          Amundson is one of an estimated 20 career officials inside the Justice Department who was re-assigned last week to a new Sanctuary City Working Group

          Get it? Amundsen was asked to enforce actual USA laws....then refused.

          26cbdc8d-7ef8-46a1-aa4b-eae2ca80ec18-image.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            blablarg18 last edited by blablarg18

            That time DOJ libs knowingly broke norms & constitutional protections. (one of many)

            2021:

            https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-steps-up-pursuit-far-right-activists-2016-voter-suppression-probe-2021-05-26/

            Federal prosecutors debated for years whether and how to pursue criminal cases against Americans suspected of disseminating false voting instructions....

            ☝ Already absurd. It was a joke. Dems also did it.

            [but they] felt it would be too difficult to bring a voter-suppression case based on online messaging, the people said. The hurdles include free-speech rights, the difficulty in establishing intent and the challenge of showing that anyone failed to vote because a specific person misled them.

            Again, Biden-Kamabla DOJ in 2021 confessed to Reuters, their self-awareness that Mackey prosecution

            1. violates Free Speech

            2. violates need for criminal intent (there was zero)

            3. violates need for criminal harm (there was zero)

            Prosecute people..... ..... for fun. so Dems feelz good. McCarthyism

            But DOJ libs weren't just hysterical McCarthyites.....

            Jealous, too.

            Mackey...[was] so effective that one study ranked him as more influential than NBC and CBS

            🤣 🤣

            Absurdly untrue....

            .....OR, if it is true, it's even more absurd. Lib self-own. DOJ libs who admit to impotence, micro dicks.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              blablarg18 last edited by blablarg18

              Mackey conviction, is thrown out unanimously.

              https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-meme-maker-douglass-mackeys-conviction-unanimously-thrown-out-by-appellate-court

              The case has been remanded to the district court with orders to immediately dismiss.

              "What a difference an election makes."

              Mackey was prosecuted after sharing a meme during the 2016 election season that joked Hillary Clinton supporters should text in their vote.

              It was a joke, but Biden's Department of Justice under Attorney General Merrick Garland accused him of election interference. Despite their claim, they could not provide evidence that anyone had been fooled by the meme into thinking that they should text their vote.

              This lack of evidence was not concerning to the DOJ, who also suggested that Mackey was racist because of the meme.

              Those memes were the basis of the jury verdict in the Eastern District of New York that convicted him of "conspiring to injure citizens in the exercise of their right to vote." The Second Circuit wrote that "the mere fact that Mackey posted the memes, even assuming that he did so with the intent to injure other citizens in the exercise of their right to vote, is not enough, standing alone, to prove a violation of Section 241. The government was obligated to show that Mackey knowingly entered into an agreement with other people to pursue that objective."

              "This the government failed to do. Its primary evidence of agreement, apart from the memes themselves, consisted of exchanges among the participants in several private Twitter message groups—exchanges the government argued showed the intent of the participants to interfere with others’ exercise of their right to vote. Yet the government failed to offer sufficient evidence that Mackey even viewed—let alone participated in—any of these exchanges.

              -NYC lib- jury convicted, in case so dumb, utterly & blatantly dumb, that real judges throw it out on its face.

              raphjd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • raphjd
                raphjd Forum Administrator @blablarg18 last edited by

                @blablarg18

                good news

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  blablarg18 @raphjd last edited by blablarg18

                  @raphjd yes. But maybe Biden-Kamabla-Garland should be prosecuted?

                  What a crime, that they even brought this evil case.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                  • 1
                  • 2
                  • 2 / 2
                  • First post
                    Last post