Project 2025: The Conservative Plan to Ban Pornography and Jail Its Purveyors
-
Project 2025, a compendium of Trump's plan to "lay out hundreds of clear and concrete policy recommendations for White House offices, Cabinet departments, Congress, and agencies, commissions, and boards" for use in the chance that he wins in 2024, describes how his administration would handle pornography:
-
Promise #1: Restore the Family as the Centerpiece of American Life and Protect Our Children
-
Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime.
-
Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.
There are some interesting choices of words there that need to be unpacked:
"Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance...." Why the mention of "transgender ideology"? Is it only transgender porn that they are against, and not mainstream porn? Transgender "ideology" makes me think of educational literature put out by the medical community, which conservatives might sarcastically refer to as "pornography". Either way, I think the mention of transgender is a red herring, an attempt to tar all of pornography by merely highlighting one word they know will trigger people. Besides, if they are referring to transgender literature, they themselves qualify that by stating "for instance", which clearly means "as one example of" many other forms, including hetero porn.
"Educators and public librarians who purvey it..." I'm certain that porn is not meant to be made available at public libraries. This might be an additional red herring to make us think they are referring to trans literature, which ostensibly might be found at a public library. In any event, the passage does suggest that maybe the people who wrote it have never stepped into a public library before.
"Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women." This passage clears up the earlier confusion by making it clear they are referring to all pornography, which includes women. Why else mention "women" if referring to only transgender literature? I believe that motivations such as these are chilling to consider.
Read the entire Project 2025 manifesto here.
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
-
@Spintendo You realize you're on a site that bans child porn - right?
As to whether this plan has least importance: NO conservative pundit I've seen, has yet mentioned it.
As to whether this plan should have least importance: well.... hmm...... YES to bits & pieces about protection of kids.
And now.... "Do Islam". Analyze Muslim plans to kill gays
-
We have an entire town in Michigan to gauge how Muslims will act when in power. It's not pretty.
No liberal can explain why white conservatives are bad for their beliefs, but Muslims are good for believing the exact something and worse.
-
Aaaand.... President Trump disavows Project 2025.
To be clear: Never did he 'avow' them. Whoever they are, they hope to ride him - not other way.
I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.
Do better next time, @Spintendo.
You weasel-worded your post, to make it sound like Trump was with them.
Project 2025, a compendium of Trump's plan....
Nope!
Just because someone claims to be MAGA....... does not mean they are
@raphjd btw - I have a feeling that
will become thematic - that is, we will see more of "false flag" - where grifters or maybe Fed-terrorists, pose as MAGAand TDS-libs repeat it
-
Libs make "Project 2025" their new thing to hoax about.
In general, libs love them sum violent paranoid hoaxes, to "justify" (cough) lib violence "in response".
Past examples are easy.
For one: lib Russiagate hoaxes DIRECTLY inspired James Hodgkinson, Congressional Baseball shooter who nearly killed Rep. Steve Scalise (R).
For another, Kyle Rittenhouse. Kyle shot 3 Antifa - in pure self-defense. Libs' hoax about Kyle, saya he shot 4 BLM wantonly. (No)
Below, a kooked-up lib gets creative.
He merges his Project 2025 delusion with his Kyle Rittenhouse delusions.
https://x.com/i/status/1810738099267457106
-
I haven't heard any conservatives talking about Project 2025, but I constantly hear liberals talking about it.
I'm betting it's a red flag op by liberals.
-
@raphjd Wiki claims it's from Heritage Foundation.
like I'd gaf
but Hoaxing it up to "Mein Kampf" status, is for sure, a thing of kooked-up libs
-
Biden said... GOOGLE IT!
-
There are some things unique to democrats/liberals:
they are the ones that invented gerrymandering;
they are the ones that vote along party lines, regardless of what each one of them actually thinks;
they distribute words and phrases to use to flood the media with propaganda - such as "Biden is SHARP AS A TACK"; or "TRUMP IS BEHIND PROJECT 2025";
it also works in reverse - at one point they were all AGAINST gay marriage, but then in roughly 2015, they all flipped to being in FAVOR of gay marriage. They have been supportive of Joe Biden for the past 5 years, but now are flipping on him overnight. Biden's brain did not turn to shit overnight. Even before Biden's brain dissolved (literally), his policies were still self-serving, pandering garbage.Republicans are also awful, BUT democrats are far WORSE!
-
@raphjd https://www.project2025.org/
Red herrings aren't usually this well-organised.
-
Sure they are. Russiagate was. "51 intel experts" was. "Covid vaxx are safe & effective" was.
They didn't only have web sites - They had full-throat media screamers & misleading government leaks.
meanwhile you @jaroonn thought Biden was mentally sharp
You drone for every lib hoax.
Did you even look at your link? They're HF nobodies.
-
@jaroonn Remember - You believe both that 1. Biden isn't orchestrated to hell & back, 2. CNN is real.
So what do you do, when CNN says Biden is orchestrated to hell & back? Have fun!
-
Artist imagines, how P2025 will bring back Plane Smoking & full meals
-
Trump's P2025 & Agenda 47 to put bullet vending machines in kindergartens!
(yes that's a joke. On libs. Some kooked-up lib believed it a minute)
-
I've seen it online, but I haven't heard of any conservatives talking about it, only liberals.
-
@spintendo @jaroonn -tard
-
Gay dude (not me) describes Lib Hive Mind at work:
I met these 3 guys yesterday at gay happy hour in NYC...
HIM: “I am really worried about Trump and this fascist Project 2025.”
ME: “It’s not from Trump, it’s from [obscure] former aides. Already been debunked.”
THEM: “OMG! Don’t tell me
You’re a fucking Trump supporter!”For a minute I started to say “no I’m not,” just to avoid another war, then I said:
“As a matter of fact, I am. Don’t I have that right?”
THEM: “If you’re gay, FUCK NO you don’t have that right. You know he’s coming after us, right?”
ME: “I don’t know any such thing. I’m on social media all day and I haven’t seen anything coming from him about that. What are you referring to?”
THEM: “Girlfriend you need to do some homework. Trump is gonna rollback gay marriage and ban gay literature in schools.”
ME: “I haven’t heard that, and gayporn is not literature.”
THEM: “He’s gonna cut LGBTQ health care funding.”
ME: “Such as what?”
[ed note: TRUMP programs made Prep / Truvada universally available, "free"]
THEM: “Girl he’s gonna bar trans people from serving in the military, make it so employers can go back to firing people for being gay, fucked up stuff like that.”
ME: “Wow, well like I said that’s not his program someone else put that out there to scare you out of voting for him.”
THEM: [storm off - ed: like in this forum LOL ]
-
Sorry libs! As President Trump CONTINUES to denounce Project 2025, its leader steps down:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1818371853804880325
“President Trump's campaign has been very clear for over a year that Project 2025 had nothing to do with the campaign, did not speak for the campaign, and should not be associated with the campaign or the President in any way,” the Trump campaign said.
“Reports of Project 2025's demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign— it will not end well for you.”
Project 2025 leader Paul Dans stepped down amid growing criticism.
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025
Writers to Project 2025 are many of the expresident´s staff at the White House.
"The Heritage Foundation is closely aligned with Trump and coordinates the initiative with a constellation of conservative groups run by Trump allies." from Wikipedia.
Trump says that he knows nothing about Project 2025, but he surely knows the writers of Project 2025, as at least 140 people who worked for him are involved. -
@serenity Flyin' in face of facts.
Come on now - Even high school teachers reject Wikipedia.
“President Trump's campaign has been very clear for over a year that Project 2025 had nothing to do with the campaign, did not speak for the campaign, and should not be associated with the campaign or the President in any way,” the Trump campaign said.
“Reports of Project 2025's demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign— it will not end well for you.”
