Misleading Torrent
-
Someone posted a misrepresent and falsifying Torrent ...
Fake Title : [TwinkPop] Caleb Preston and Jake Manning
Coded Name : Ja vs
Original : [TwinkPop] Jake Preston & Caleb Manning
https://www.twinkpop.com/video/9427561/sneaky-game-night-fuckTorrent : https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=2e0d1939c2e794f1889730199b0dd33de099570f440d71b9
For those of you doing this trying to avoid copyright ...
Please stop ... This violates Uploading Rules ... -
![[TwinkPop] Caleb Preston and Jake Manning.jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1697160114598-twinkpop-caleb-preston-and-jake-manning.jpg)
-
The character in image are : [TwinkPop] Jake Preston & Cameron Neuton
https://www.twinkpop.com/video/9445171/grinding-his-deck -
Uploader Excuse :
-
@john32123666 When someone has read the rules and simply forgotten something I can forgive that. When someone hasn't read the rules thoroughly enough to know them properly, I can sort of forgive that. (There are quite a lot of them and it's not an easy read..)
But when someone clearly knows the rules and chooses to ignore them then they're just asking for it. Any torrent site is only as good as its uploads, and it seems to be worse now than it was a few years ago. People are getting lazy, and have no interest in quality uploads. They just want the ratio.
Let's hope that the mods have "explained" the rules to him.
-
So what should he have done instead? Not upload the torrrent at all?
-
@jujulette said in Misleading Torrent:
So what should he have done instead? Not upload the torrrent at all?
I would say, yes. Don't bother posting with a hopelessly vague title and description. Without a clear title, no one will find the torrent by searching on the site, so it's going to die a quick death anyway. No one searching for the TwinkPop video a week from now, whether they use the site name, the video name, or the actors names would be able to find this torrent.
In the example John cited, another poster did a great job of posting the same exact file a few hours later with a searchable title. That's the one that has the best chance to survive after it is no longer on the first few pages...
-
@jujulette Every time somebody uploads a file and changes its name to something cryptic it utterly fucks all of us. People end up downloading things again and again believing them to be new material when in reality it's usually just an altered title or filename. It hurts ratios, takes up valuable storage space, makes things impossible to catalogue and worst of all these files propagate across multiple trackers to the point where the "real" file gets lost in the sands of time.
I'm in the process of tidying up my library, and in the last 2 days alone I've recovered over 300Gb of space across multiple drives where I've been able to identify identical files with misleading names. Some of them I've had 5 or more copies of them, all downloaded from different sites over the years.
Yes, it's annoying when files get DMCA hits, but I'd rather see a few of those disappear than end up with terabytes of rubbish. As @tnar said, if nobody can find it then what's the point of it staying here?
-
The purpose of re-naming data files properly/correctly can be retrieve in the future once it has been accidentally deleted or damage ...
While generic/bogus [altered] name can't ... -
I think we can agree to disagree. I prefer by far to have a torrent available for download and to erase it just after I have downloaded it rather than not have a torrent uploaded at all because of strict naming rules.
For me the contents counts much more than the packaging.
