Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report
-
Apparently, reminding MEN that letting a baby suck on their "titties" ain't breast FEEDING is a crime.
-
@raphjd Wtf is wrong with dear Australia?
-
The funny thing is, liberals don't understand what is wrong with this.
Clearly, reality doesn't matter to them. Next toe sucking will be "breast feeding".
-
This post is deleted! -
The new laws that allow Australia's eSafety Commissioner to compel platforms such as Twitter, to remove "cyber‑abuse material" within 24 hours, or face a hefty fine, is a good thing. It's a second avenue of recourse for those dissatisfied with the platforms' moderation policies.
The amendments to Australia's Online Safety Act came into effect after being passed by the Australian Senate last June. Under the new legislation, the eSafety Commissioner can issue a removal notice to a platform if they don't take down a post within 48 hours of receiving a complaint about it.
So anti-breastfeeders beware.
-
@raphjd said in /post/309556):
Apparently, reminding MEN that letting a baby suck on their "titties" ain't breast FEEDING is a crime.
Twitter is not a "reminder" service. If they want to be able to spew hate speech to people on Twitter then they should lobby their legislators to change back the law.
What happened to the good old days when people changed laws they didn't like, instead of complaining about them. When they get thousands of people all over the country marching in the streets like BLM did, then maybe their complaints are valid. Something tells me we're not going to see anytime soon thousands of Australians marching in the streets for these two ladies rights to harangue people on Twitter, two women who clearly don't understand the concept of MYOB.
-
You are a fucking idiot.
It's not "breast feeding" when a baby sucks on a man's titties. Not even in your fucked up clown world.
You are such a piece of shit that you will justify anything from the left.
AH, you support rioting, looting and murder to get your way. You are a self admitted domestic terrorist.
-
If you want people to mind their own business, then why go on Twitter to brag that you are having a baby suck on your man titties?
If you broadcast your shit to the world, then expect the world to respond.
It's a simple concept that even a domestic terrorist should be able to understand it. But clearly, you don't.
-
Just to keep our usual gaggle of transphobes honest, it is possible to pump a man full of enough estrogen and prolactin hormones to make him produce breast milk with a mixture of lactose, proteins, and electrolytes similar to a woman's colostrum or milk. And, of course, the act of breastfeeding is for more than JUST feeding the baby (as some women "breastfeed" even when they fail to produce milk), because of its effects on the baby, i.e., the skin-to-skin contact.
-
Anyone who doesn't agree with the lunatic Queer trans agenda, is a transphobe.
Plenty of trans people agree with me.
Not all trans people are freaks.
-
@hubrys "our usual gaggle of transphobes" - In your head of course. Get help.
-
@hubrys You say it yourself.... SIMILAR.... SIMILAR is NOT the same. There is a difference. One is naturally occurring and the other is not.
The only difference between martyrdom and suicide is press coverage! -
@raphjd said in
If you broadcast your shit to the world, then expect the world to respond.
Wouldn't your Methodist mother-in-law have something different to say about that world response? Those women's Twitter tirades certainly don't appear to follow the creed of "love one's neighbor as oneself".
-
What are you even talking about?
-
@Spintendo Trying to manipulate?
![1681238204447-smug-lib-lecture[1].jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1684938925772-1681238204447-smug-lib-lecture-1.jpg)
-
@MrMazda said in Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report:
You say it yourself.... SIMILAR.... SIMILAR is NOT the same. There is a difference. One is naturally occurring and the other is not.
And you are assuming that similar but different means worse. You are assuming that naturally occurring means better.
Wild almonds are natural, but I'd much rather eat the genetically modified cultured almonds that don't have enough cyanide in them to kill me. Cultured almonds are similar (same shape, color, texture, and nutritional value) but different (not bitter and not full of poison) to natural almonds.
-
@hubrys I have assumed no such thing. I am merely saying that they are not the same thing, but the problem is that there is no scientific basis to determine one way or the other how it compares, so one should air on the side of caution as the effects of the non naturally occurring version are not known.
-
@hubrys said in Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report:
because of its effects on the baby, i.e., the skin-to-skin contact.
Do you need to have a baby suck on your man titties in order to have skin-to-skin contact?
Also, what studies have been done to say that sucking on juiced-up man titty milk is safe for the baby?
-
@raphjd said in Two Women Are Told They've Broken the Law by Criticizing Male Attempting to Breastfeed a Child: Report:
Also, what studies have been done to say that sucking on juiced-up man titty milk is safe for the baby?
Precisely my point.... While they may be similar, they are not the same thing. As they are not the same thing, a reasonable person would exercise caution as not to harm the baby.
-
Breastfeeding women - real ones - are told to avoid alcohol or wait hours for it to clear from milk.
Yet libs will defend mentally-ill men on massive hormones & God knows what, oozing out some mixture of pus, hormones & God knows what for their own sexual satisfaction.
In a sane world, child services would take away baby - for its protection.
