"Why Martin Luther King Was Republican"
-
@raphjd Also remember: Trump is FIRST USA Pres to win being in favor of gay marriage.
In 2008 & 12, both times Obama said marriage is between a man & a woman.
Barry Soetoro changed his stance very late, only 2015 after SCOTUS changed. You could say Barry led from behind. (cough)
In 2016, GOP still opposed but Trump told them sorry but I support, deal with it. Hillary also supported, so world woulda had that "first" anyway. But ya it was finally Trump.
Schumer gave us the Religious Freedom restoration Act that gave believers the right to discriminate against ONLY the LGBT community.
Jaw dropping.
-
Trump was the first President to win after waving the Pride flag while campaigning.
Hillary was completely against marriage equality until she found out she was running against Trump. Then she made the switch to being pro-marriage equality.
-
@raphjd This does not surprise me... Many politicians will say whatever they think they need to say in order to get into power, and then quite often, do not deliver on their promises. It's kind of sad, really.
-
Republicans in 1994: "Biden is bad because he supports passing a crime bill in 1994 that will let criminals out of prison."
Republicans in 2023: "Biden is bad because he supported a crime bill in 1994 that put criminals in prison."
Look at that there.... those clever Republicans, they switched their line of attack! ....so much so that it appears as if Biden is damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't.
I mean really, the idea that Republicans would think that Biden is bad because he passed a crime bill is utterly ridiculous. Why would Republicans even care about criminals going to prison? (Bring let out, that they would hate)
-
You really are a fucking liar.
I never said anything about how bad the law was. I pointed out how bad you liberals said the law is and how racist Democrats were in promoting the law.
If you refuse to be honest, you might need a vacation.
You prove everything I say about liberals is true.
-
@raphjd You are right. Thirty years ago the Democrats were getting in wrong. The Republicans were worse. The difference is the Democrats have progressed while the Republicans have regressed. You can't ignore the reality....just look what's going on, mate.
-
The Democrats have not changed.
You may not call blacks the N-word, but you (generic) still think of them as uncivilized, unsocialized, uneducated, unwashed, unclean, jungle animals and all the other things you guys said about them.
The only difference is now you let them get away switch everything because you are guilty of the racism of low expectations.
Black people can't do anything wrong is the liberal dogma.
Kidnap a mentally disabled 19yo white dude and torture him for nearly 36 hours white shouting racist shit at him, ain't a hate crime because 6 blacks did it. If the races were reversed, liberals would be out for blood and they'd attack every white person they saw because all whites are guilty.
It's ok to fake a hate crime, as we keep seeing. Hell, it makes a lot of money and destroys white lives, both of which liberals love.
It's ok to call black people racist names if they dare not pick the DNC cotton.
It's ok to gaslight us the Antifa doesn't exist, because you think we'll eventually believe us.
NO, the DNC hasn't changed, not really. It's only new coat of paint, but it's still the same old shitty rustbucket underneath.
-
@jaroonn Dems have not "progressed".
Since USA founding Dems been party of racists - and still are.
Party of idiots with "race on the brain".
Dems went from thinking "Let's enslave blacks with chains & whips, & profit off them," to "Let's enslave blacks with pandering & lies, & profit off them."
OK I guess that is better, a little progress. But Dems were forced by the rest of the world.
Lincoln, Civil War, GOP Abolitionists, earlier Britain abolishing slavery - Dems had to be forced.
Later MLK spoke out for a color-blind society - and now, in 2023, Dems say no no, reject it, that was only White Supremacy sneaking into MLK.
Party for racist morons. Always been, always will be.
USA Pres Lyndon Johnson, the Dem who pandered & lied & got blacks to switch parties, was one of the ugliest biggest N-word users.
-
@raphjd You really need to travel and meet new people.
-
@blablarg18 Your grasp of history is indicative of why many Americans are considered ignoramuses. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing; especially in the hands of someone with zero critical thinking skills.
-
Why, so I can meet more of the same?
BTW, I have traveled all over the US and the world. Liberals are virtually the same, no matter where you go.
-
@raphjd Ok. It's too bad you see the world and other people in that way. I can't imagine what it's like being so negative and hateful. But if it works for you.
-
AH, so you think I should close my eyes and pretend?
You guys do nothing but spew hate at us, but want us to not view you in a bad light.
You guys criminalized reality. Telling a dude that it's not "breast feeding" for a baby to suck on his tits is a crime, or have you missed that thread?
You guys redefine words to suit your agenda.
You guys whined about Jim Crow, which you guys did, then you bring it back.
You make anti-white policies and try to pass anti-white laws.
I know you were outraged when Dylan Roof shot up that black church, but were you equally outraged when Emanuel Samson shot up the white church? I bet not.
-
@jaroonn Brave face but we both know I show critical thinking & you don't, otherwise you would not be feeling so stung.
(Personal remarks - my post hadn't made any about you; your reply went there first & now here we are.)
-
@blablarg18 I apologize if you felt I was personally attacking you. I wasn't. That said, I do believe that you show no critical thinking skills whatsoever when you "support" your agenda with cherry-picked anecdotes, many of which are fatuous and most of which are hyperbolic, and emotionally-charged approaching the ludicrous. You seem also to be unable to understand that time is linear. You definitely would not me to be on your thesis committee.
-
@raphjd How you decide to see the world is your business. I just find it interesting as I've been working and living internationally most of my life, and in my experience the more educated and well-travelled a person is, the more progressive, tolerant and open-minded they are. You seem to be an anomaly. You are so certain that you can pigeon-hole people (erroneously by the way in my case), that I can't see how you can think that will lead you to factual judgement calls. But like I said, whatever gets you through the night. It doesn't matter anyway. These conversations we are having in this wee corner of cyberspace are not solving anything. They are a complete waste of time.
-
LOL, you people make me laugh.
I point to specific things that you people do, but I'm the bad guy.
-
@jaroonn Pathetic. Typical lib gaslighting & malice. Just pathetic.
It's no skin off my nose. I'm laughing.
You BLATANTLY attacked me on the "you" or "your" level (& again, were first to do so - I hadn't yet, and might never have).
Then you say in essence or in so many words, "I'm sorry you noticed & I would hurt you if I could, for example if I were on your thesis committee" proving you're not sorry. Invalidating your own fake-non-apology.
-
@raphjd said in (/post/309517):
I never said anything about how bad the law was. I pointed out how bad you liberals said the law is
LoL, isn't that just the same thing? ..."pointing out" liberal talking points, and "highlighting" bidens involvement in them?
And why would you be "pointing out" liberal talking points? Why would you waste your time repeating liberal media news? There's got to be a reason in there somewhere. Do tell
-
You people said how racist the law is.
Clearly, Democrats promoted the law in the most racist way possible.
You worship the racist Democrats.
Trump got rid a large chunks of the racist law that you people hated and you get butt hurt at Trump.
It shows how fucked in the head you people are.
It's blatantly obvious, from liberals' won mouths that you guys are racists.