Most POLLUTED Cities are Dem-run
-
Let's see, which cities are the MOST polluted? It's Democrat Run. Just look it up. I'm sure I'll get someone asking me for the sources because they can't do it themselves, AGAIN. I can provide that if you're too pathetic.
-
This is true! Just compare the two cities below:
NYC, NY
Democratic run
Population: 8,405,397Boones Acre, WY
Republican run
Population: 45In a comparison of these two cities, it was found that the Republican-led city was less polluted than the Democratic-led city.
--
A city of 45 people generating trash and going to the bathroom is going to be cleaner and smell a lot nicer than a city of 8 million people generating trash and going to the bathroom.
The speed of light from Earth to the Moon in real time (c = 3×10^8 m/s) -
@spintendo Political parties aside, I would argue that this comparison is more about population density. If we had a single "restroom" and 80 people had to use compared to only 2 people, I would imagine that the restroom that serviced more people would definitely be more polluted; especially when we are comparing a population of 8 million to 45.
-
But why would there be an equal amount of bathrooms?
The larger place would have a lot more bathrooms.
Clearly, @Spintendo is being extremely dishonest with his examples.
-
@raphjd I never said that there are an equal amount of bathrooms in New York City and Boones Acre. You are correct that a larger populated city would have more bathrooms, I would assume so. I'm arguing about the average amount of people that each restroom services when comparing a densely populated versus sparsely populated areas, unless you genuinely believe that NYC and Boones Acre (wouldn't really classify that as a city but I digress) have the same ratio of people per bathroom.
To be clear, I'm not defending the establishment democrat (most elected officials) as I know that they are just as bad as most republican elected officials. I'm only replying as the argument provided by @Spintendo was in bad faith.
-
It's illegal everywhere in the US to have housing without a bathroom. Temporary housing, such as hostels and homeless shelters have to obey an occupancy ratio. A lot of things are going to be the same or similar due to the occupancy ratio via code enforcement.
My aunt is a pharmacist and used to work for Osco Drugs. She worked in Chicago and my home town which is a lot smaller than Chicago. The Chicago store despite being the same size since all their stores are the same had 3 times the employees than the store in my home town.
While I do agree to an extent with you, there would also be more people to clean those toilets.
Then of course you have the homeless who are drawn to the DNC-run cities due to their liberal policies.
I do agree that @Spintendo has replied to the series of threads by @ManHandler in total bad faith.
-
@ericchang098 There's an app for San Francisco where you can report human feces on the sidewalk, and it's overflowing with human shit. Feces everywhere. There is no comparison.
-
You can literally shit and piss anywhere in San Francisco and get away with it, except in front of Pelosi's house.
We posted about the guy who got arrested for that a few months ago.
A city covered in bodily waste and dirty needles, but Pelosi's house is exempt. Hell, it's just one of her many houses in the area. Her main house (nearly a palace) isn't even in her district.
-
@raphjd Yep. You're allowed to shit on the street and throw your dirty needles on the sidewalk, and that's POLICY, and rob a Walgreens if you're a minority. Yet, this guy claims it's because there's more people. No. It's because the city says it's OK. It's pretty fucking simple.
-
@manhandler Once again, I only replied to @Spintendo argument which was made in bad faith. I would disagree that the ill woe's of society (i.e., homelessness, pollution, etc.) can entirely be based to a political party; instead I argued on population density. I've lived in Yakima, Seattle, and Spokane (whilst Spokane is not really a conservative bastion, it still is fairly conservative compared to the west side of Washington). Homelessness is just as big of an issue in Seattle and Spokane; albeit Spokane does not have as large of a problem as Seattle does. But from what I have noticed both cities don't even try to even deal with the growing homeless population.
As per your comment on San Francisco, I'm not gonna deny that the issues that you have communicated; in fact I very much agree with you. San Francisco has been run by establishment Democrats that are just as ignorant and unwilling to provide affordable housing that would have largely solved the rising homeless population.
-
@ericchang098 Good, I'm glad you're starting to see. Democrat cities are more than willing to perpetuate crime and filth as POLICY. And so people who are losers flock there. It has nothing to do with more people being there, that is an illusion. Go to big Republican cities like Plano, Texas and you don't find that crap. Everything runs smooth. The Democratic Party WANTS crime, because it gives them excuses to take your rights. That gives them more power, and don't mistake it. It's part of their plan to take over this nation.
