Why won’t Donald Trump rush to tweet criticism of attacks against Muslims?
-
You don't have to search for the quote, just click where it says "Quote from: : mhorndisk…" and it will take you to the quoted person's post.
Don't play dumb, we are talking about the 1+ billion Muslims to which mhorndisk loathes.
On another site I was victim of a liberal who would click "quote" then edit the quote to suit his bullshit and claim I said it. I always question quotes if they seem out of contest.
Hell I often edit quotes so it's the part I want, rather than include the entire novel of a post.
-
Whether mhorndisk was calling for the death of 1 billion Muslims or the eradication of their religion–-both are objectionable.
-
Why is it bad to call for a religion so rooted in hatred, and invented by a child fucker, to be eradicated?
We had to stamp out the Branch Davidians and they were far less a threat than muslims.
-
Why is it bad to call for a religion so rooted in hatred, and invented by a child fucker, to be eradicated?
We had to stamp out the Branch Davidians and they were far less a threat than muslims.
I know you live in the UK, but in the USA, the freedom of religion is protected by our constitution, as the first amendment protects hate speech.
The murderous acts of Islamists need to be eradicated, not the religion itself. -
Donald Trump tweeted about the terrorist attacks in Paris in November 2015 about 3½ hours after they occurred. The following month, he tweeted about the mass shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., 90 minutes after the violence began. It took fewer than 12 hours from the time an EgyptAir flight went missing in May 2016 for Trump to speculate publicly that the attack was terror-related. More than a year later, it’s still not clear what happened to the plane.
When terrorists drove a van into a crowd on London Bridge earlier this month, Trump tweeted about the need to be “smart, vigilant and tough” even before authorities identified terror as the motive behind the attack.
i dunno, when will you realize why there will never be a pride parade in Damascus?
-
The murderous acts of Islamists need to be eradicated, not the religion itself.
Except.. to the terrorists, their murderous acts and the religion are one in the same. They believe their religion commands them to do those horrible things.
Is it better to kill the people? or eradicate the religion, or at least ban that interpretation of the religion?
Here's an idea.. bulldoze any mosque in which they advocate killing people.
-
Why is it bad to call for a religion so rooted in hatred, and invented by a child fucker, to be eradicated?
We had to stamp out the Branch Davidians and they were far less a threat than muslims.
I believe Hitler also asked the same thing…
-
Why is it bad to call for a religion so rooted in hatred, and invented by a child fucker, to be eradicated?
We had to stamp out the Branch Davidians and they were far less a threat than muslims.
I know you live in the UK, but in the USA, the freedom of religion is protected by our constitution, as the first amendment protects hate speech.
The murderous acts of Islamists need to be eradicated, not the religion itself.I am an American, well dual national now.
My husband is British.
We were forced out of the US because illegals got priority in the immigration queue, which meant his green card would not be processed in time, even though he started it on the very first day he was allowed to.
-
Why is it bad to call for a religion so rooted in hatred, and invented by a child fucker, to be eradicated?
We had to stamp out the Branch Davidians and they were far less a threat than muslims.
I believe Hitler also asked the same thing…
Such a child.
I hope you know that you proved Godwin's law.
-
-
Again, I have dated people of ALL races and creeds, including Muslim, Christian, and Jewish… black, white, oriental, latin, and arab. I never said I wish for a billion people to be eradicated. I only agree with one faith, and I believe that the other so-called faiths should be "exposed as lies," and thus destroyed based on merit - which means of course, that we need to work hard to reveal their atrocious and nefarious ambitions. Just as I believe treasonous politicians should be exposed and disposed of in accordance with the law. You can twist my words all you want, but I never said that we need to exterminate 1 billion Muslims. This is why you liberals keep losing. You take things way out of context and everyone realizes it. And then they see how out of touch you are with reality and try to smear people with the false-truths that you want to push like a drug. I feel like you should be ashamed of yourself for making up garbage to try to convince one person of your lies just to make yourself feel superior. But it's not working so I don't care.
-
Whether mhorndisk was calling for the death of 1 billion Muslims or the eradication of their religion–-both are objectionable.
nothing wrong with wishing for the eradication of a religious ideology that is still a modern day plague to humanity through jihad and terrorism. Good looking men but such a bad ideology :cry2:
-
Funny I've often seen a call for the eradication of religions on different forums without any squeals from the PC brigade. Oh but that's the eradication of all religions. The bloodshed that would involve would be incalculable.
