Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare
-
I don't need to comment on this one. Just click the link and read.
Xhttp://freebeacon.com/politics/five-old-tweets-came-back-haunt-chuck-schumer/ (remove the X to view it)
-
Anyone coming to this site using the word "Libtard"? :cheesy2: :cheesy2: :cheesy2:
-
Anyone coming to this site using the word "Libtard"? :cheesy2: :cheesy2: :cheesy2:
There are a handful of alt-right trolls here, spewing the propaganda they are brainwashed with. It is part of the alt-right's attempt to recruit LGBT people from the left to the right. It is idiotic, and transparent- just like everything the alt-right does. Don't bother arguing with them- they can't think. All they will do is drown you out by repeating their catchphrases and talking points over and over like good little wind-up toys.
-
His cousin is Amy Schumer. That family has bad genes.
-
Anyone coming to this site using the word "Libtard"? :cheesy2: :cheesy2: :cheesy2:
There are a handful of alt-right trolls here, spewing the propaganda they are brainwashed with. It is part of the alt-right's attempt to recruit LGBT people from the left to the right. It is idiotic, and transparent- just like everything the alt-right does. Don't bother arguing with them- they can't think. All they will do is drown you out by repeating their catchphrases and talking points over and over like good little wind-up toys.
I agree with you. These alt-right guys just have really tiny penises and they are super insecure about it so they come here and bash Hillary and Obama…...two people who just don't matter.
That being said, I agree with Fredrick about Schumer. I don't like the idea of obstructionism from either party. I didn't like it when the Republicans did it and I don't like it now.
-
Anyone coming to this site using the word "Libtard"? :cheesy2: :cheesy2: :cheesy2:
There are a handful of alt-right trolls here, spewing the propaganda they are brainwashed with. It is part of the alt-right's attempt to recruit LGBT people from the left to the right. It is idiotic, and transparent- just like everything the alt-right does. Don't bother arguing with them- they can't think. All they will do is drown you out by repeating their catchphrases and talking points over and over like good little wind-up toys.
I agree with you. These alt-right guys just have really tiny penises and they are super insecure about it so they come here and bash Hillary and Obama…...two people who just don't matter.
That being said, I agree with Fredrick about Schumer. I don't like the idea of obstructionism from either party. I didn't like it when the Republicans did it and I don't like it now.
That would be true if Hillary did not matter. One would expect that after losing the election, she would put away her daggers.. but no. Just TODAY she launched a new PAC to raise money and RESIST everything Trump does. She doesn't know when to quit! That is one vengeful bitch!
-
Amy Schumer is painfully unfunny
-
I am shocked at the community here… recently signed up. Thought I would be part of an inclusive, kind, caring community, but all I am seem to be seeing is this shit... I don't understand the rationale. I understand there are going to be right-wing or "alt-right" LGBTQ but I don't understand why? What has right wing politics done for the LBTGQ?
-
I am shocked at the community here… recently signed up. Thought I would be part of an inclusive, kind, caring community, but all I am seem to be seeing is this shit... I don't understand the rationale. I understand there are going to be right-wing or "alt-right" LGBTQ but I don't understand why? What has right wing politics done for the LBTGQ?
Well this is not a gay sexuality support/unity forum. This is a gay porn/erotic/adult site.
Many guys on this site I wouldn't be surprised are very homophobic and for whatever reason like to cum to naked guys, yet don't consider themselves gay, and don't want to be involved the in the gay rights movement.
I personally don't understand it, but I do realize it and accept it.
Many guys, (not all, buy many) who are homophobic happen to be civil with their virtues and are also racist, sexist, transphobic, etc.
So I'm sorry if you didn't realize this, because I did.
-
I am shocked at the community here… recently signed up. Thought I would be part of an inclusive, kind, caring community, but all I am seem to be seeing is this shit... I don't understand the rationale. I understand there are going to be right-wing or "alt-right" LGBTQ but I don't understand why? What has right wing politics done for the LBTGQ?
What has left wing politics done for LBGTQ?
I would remind you that Hillary was 100% anti gay marriage until election time rolled around.People are so concerned about LBGTQ people being permitted to do whatever they want. I don't think LBGTQ people NOR heterosexual people should be openly flaunting their sexuality in public. Also, there should be some sort of harassment laws prohibiting people from being questioned about their sexuality. It bothers me whenever a celebrity is cross-examined about who they are dating, if they have any kids, if they are married, etc. It really pissed me off that in offices I worked in, the straight people would drag their kids and wife in when applying for a job to squeeze more money out of the business owner. And when a gay guy's boyfriend picked him up from work, that led to that guy being forced to quit a couple of months later.
Sexuality should not be a driving force in society. Of course it is, but why make the problem worse by INCREASING the amount of sexuality in society?
Here's another example.. nude beaches.. it's impossible to ignore sexuality at a nude beach. Who want's nude beaches anyway? Almost all the people are ugly as sin!
Giving people (gay, straight, or whatever) the right to exercise their sexuality in pubic (pun intended) just CREATES more problems. It' doesn't reduce problems. -
After watching Chuck Schumer pull off his wig and say this I think he's totally nasty.
-
I am shocked at the community here… recently signed up. Thought I would be part of an inclusive, kind, caring community, but all I am seem to be seeing is this shit... I don't understand the rationale. I understand there are going to be right-wing or "alt-right" LGBTQ but I don't understand why? What has right wing politics done for the LBTGQ?
"Alt-Right" has been redefined by the left to mean Nazi. That's bullshit.
The alt-right has nothing to do with Nazi'ism. It's about not being the traditional right.
SJWs of all stripes have caused a lot of people to turn their backs on the left. I've named many of the freaks in previous threads so I'm not gonna do it here, but those people and their supporters are doing nothing but harming real LGBTIs. Gender trenders, gender terrorists and all the other ass clown need to stop their shit and grow up.
Governments need to stop sucking their asses and be sensible when making laws. NYC, Canada and others have passed laws that can destroy a business for a simple mistake due to the antics of people like Elliot Cope, Dakota and whatnot.
Governments are criminalizing speech, then talking about how they love free speech.
Liberals are setting fire to building, that have people in them, to prevent free speech from occurring. This was at Berkeley, no less, the birthplace of college campus free speech.
Feminists cry about gender equality, but protest about equalizing the state pension age in the UK. They also fought 3 times in the last 14 years to prevent the UK from making sex crime laws gender neutral. Similar things in other countries.
-
What has left wing politics done for LBGTQ?
Everything. Literally every advancement of gay rights. Everything from the decriminalization of sodomy to the marriage equality. It was all left-wing politics, left-wing activism, left-wing political parties. The exact "libtards" you libel in your post.
I would remind you that Hillary was 100% anti gay marriage until election time rolled around.
She also tenaciously used the state department to put pressure on nations with anti-LGBT laws, and started tying US aid to LGBT rights. She also reversed the Bush era policy of rejecting LGBT refugees. There are hundreds (if not thousands) of LGBT people alive today because of her.
Also, there should be some sort of harassment laws prohibiting people from being questioned about their sexuality. It bothers me whenever a celebrity is cross-examined about who they are dating, if they have any kids, if they are married, etc. It really pissed me off that in offices I worked in, the straight people would drag their kids and wife in when applying for a job to squeeze more money out of the business owner. And when a gay guy's boyfriend picked him up from work, that led to that guy being forced to quit a couple of months later.
Hey, remember how I said left-wing politics were responsible for everything? Well in places where those left-wing politics succeeded then that guy could have sued for discrimination. In places where the right-wing politics succeeded, he is shit out of luck.
-
In the UK, it was the conservatives that gave us marriage equality. Liberals were happy with "separate but some what similar".
It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.
-
In the UK, it was the conservatives that gave us marriage equality. Liberals were happy with "separate but some what similar".
It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.
The UK Conservative Party is very, very different from the conservative US Republican Party. I wouldn't be surprised if they have more in common with the US Democratic Party.
-
In the UK, it was the conservatives that gave us marriage equality. Liberals were happy with "separate but some what similar".
It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.
Well someone forgot to tell the Labor MPs when they were voting on the bill. The Conservatives voted 127 to 117 against the bill, while Labor voted 194 to 14 for the bill.
-
It was still the conservative government that gave it to us.
Labour thought that we had enough equality with "separate, but somewhat equal" civil partnerships.
-
It was still the conservative government that gave it to us.
Labour thought that we had enough equality with "separate, but somewhat equal" civil partnerships.
So the conservatives who voted by majority against it gave it to you, and labor who voted by overwhelming majority for it thought it wasn't necessary?
Is this really your thought process?
-
Which government put it forward and which government said "separate, but somewhat similar" was enough.
-
Which government put it forward and which government said "separate, but somewhat similar" was enough.
Who voted for it and who voted against it?
